Method no.: |
PV2114 |
|
Control no.: |
T-PV2114-01-8907-CH |
|
Matrix: |
Air |
|
Target concentration: |
2.5 mg/m3 (ACGIH
TLV-TWA) |
|
Procedure: |
Samples are collected by drawing known
volumes of air through OSHA versatile sampler (OVS-2) tubes,
each containing a glass fiber filter and two sections of XAD-2
adsorbent. Samples are desorbed with acetonitrile and analyzed by
high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using an ultraviolet
(UV) detector. |
|
Recommended air volume and
sampling rate: |
60 L at 1.0 L/min |
|
Detection limit of the
overall procedure (based on the recommended air volume and
the analytical detection limit: |
0.029
mg/m3 |
|
Status of method: |
Partially validated method. This method
has been only partially evaluated and is presented for information
and trial use only. |
|
Date: |
July 1989 |
|
Chemist: |
David B. Armitage |
Carcinogen and Pesticide
Branch OSHA Analytical Laboratory Salt Lake City,
Utah | 1. General
Discussion
1.1 Background
1.1.1 History of procedure
This evaluation was
undertaken to determine the effectiveness of the OVS-2 tube as a
sampling device for methomyl. It follows the procedure developed for
carbaryl. (Ref. 5.1)
1.1.2 Toxic effects (This section is for
information only and should not be taken as the basis of OSHA
policy).
The toxic effects of carbamate pesticides parallel
those of organophosphorus pesticides. Both classes of compounds
inhibit cholinesterase, thereby allowing the accumulation of large
amounts of acetylcholine. The major difference being that this
inhibition is reversible for carbamates and irreversible for
organophosphates.
The following paragraph describing the
results of this cholinesterase inhibition is excerpted from the book
OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES, A Guide To Their
Recognition and is applicable to both carbamates and
organophosphates. (Ref. 5.2)
When a critical level of
cholinesterase depletion is reached, usually about 20% of normal,
symptoms and signs of acetylcholine accumulation poisoning become
manifest. Symptoms may include blurred vision, weakness, nausea,
headache, abdominal cramps, chest discomfort, and diarrhea. Signs may
include miosis, muscle twitching, salivation, sweating, tearing,
cyanosis, convulsions, and coma.
Carbamate pesticides can have
low oral LD50s but in general their dermal LD50s
are higher than other, cholinesterase inhibiting pesticides, such as
organophosphates.
Methomyl has an acute oral LD50
of 25 to 40 mg/kg for rats. The acute dermal (rabbit LD50
is 5880 mg/kg for a 24% liquid formulation. (Ref. 5.3)
Due to
these factors methomyl has been given an exposure limit of 2.5
mg/m3 by the ACGIH. (Ref. 5.3)
1.1.3 Potential
workplace exposure
No estimate of worker exposure to methomyl
could be found. Methomyl is used as an insecticide. (Ref.
5.4.)
1.1.4. Physical properties (Ref.
5.3.-5.4.)
Molecular weight: |
162.20 |
Molecular formula: |
C5H10N2O2S |
CAS #: |
16752-77-5 |
IMIS #: |
1644 |
Melting point: |
78 to 79°C |
Vapor Pressure: |
0.0067 Pa at 25°C |
Appearance: |
white crystalline
solid |
Solubility: |
5.8 g/100 g water 42 g/100
g ethanol 100 g/100 g methanol |
Synonyms: |
Lannate, Lanox 216,
NuBait II, Nudrin, SD 14999. |
Chemical Name: |
S-Methyl-N-[(methylcarbamoyl)oxy] -thioacetimidate |
UV spectrum: |
 |
Structure: |
 | 1.2
Limit defining parameters
The detection limit of the analytical
procedure is 8.8 ng per injection. This is the amount of analyte which
will give a peak whose height is approximately five times the baseline
noise. 2. Sampling Procedure
2.1 Apparatus
2.1.1. A personal sampling pump that can be calibrated to
within ±5% of the recommended flow rate with the sampling device in
line.
2.1.2. OVS-2 tubes, which are specially made 13-mm,
o.d. glass tubes that are tapered to 6-mm o.d. They are packed with a
140-mg backup section and a 270-mg sampling section of cleaned XAD-2.
The backup section is retained by two foam plugs and the sampling
section is between one foam plug and a 13-mm diameter glass fiber
filter. The glass fiber filter is held next to the sampling section by
a poly- tetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) retainer.
Figure 2.1.2.
OVS-2 Sampling Device.
2.2 Reagents
No sampling reagents are required.
2.3 Sampling technique
2.3.1 Attach the small end of the OVS-2 sampling tube to
the sampling pump with flexible, plastic tubing such that the
large, front section of the sampling tube is exposed directly to the
atmosphere. Do not place any tubing in front of the sampler.
2.3.2 Attach the sampler vertically (large end down) in the
worker's breathing zone in such a manner that it does not impede work
performance.
2.3.3 After sampling for the appropriate time,
remove the sampling device and seal the tube with plastic end caps.
2.3.4 Wrap each sample end-to-end with an OSHA seal (Form 21).
2.3.5 Submit at least one blank with each set of samples.
Handle the blank the same as the other samples but do not draw air
through it.
2.3.6 Submit any bulk samples in a separate
container. Do not ship them with the air samples. 2.4
Extraction and desorption efficiencies
2.4.1 Glass fiber filter
Six 13-mm glass fiber
filters were placed in separate 4-mL vials. Five of these filters were
each liquid spiked with 28 µL of a 5.345 mg/mL solution of methomyl in
acetonitrile. These six vials were sealed with PTFE-lined septa and
stored overnight in a drawer at room temperature. They were then
extracted with 2.0 mL of acetonitrile and analyzed as in Section
3.5.
Table 2.4.1 |
Glass Fiber Filter Extraction Study |
|
Filter #
|
Amount
Spiked |
Amount Recovered |
% Recovery
|
|
F1 |
149.66 µg
|
147.56 µg
|
98.6 |
F2 |
149.66 µg
|
148.91 µg
|
99.5 |
F3 |
149.66 µg
|
149.66 µg
|
100.0
|
F4 |
149.66 µg
|
148.91 µg
|
99.5 |
F5 |
149.66 µg
|
141.13 µg
|
94.3 |
F6 |
00.00 µg
|
00.00 µg
|
Blank
|
|
|
Average recovery is 98.4% |
| 2.4.2
XAD-2 adsorbent
An amount of XAD-2 adsorbent equal to
the sampling section (270 mg) of an OVS-2 tube was placed in each of
six 4-mL vials which were then sealed with PTFE-lined septa. Five of
these vials were then each liquid spiked with 28 µL of a 5.345 mg/mL
solution of methomyl in acetonitrile by injecting the solution onto
the adsorbent through the septum. After replacing the punctured septa,
these vials were allowed to equilibrate overnight in a drawer at room
temperature. They were then desorbed with 2.0 mL of acetonitrile and
analyzed as in Section 3.5.
Table
2.4.2 |
XAD-2
Adsorbent Desorption Study |
|
Adsorbent # |
Amount spiked
|
Amount recovered |
% Recovery |
|
AD1 |
149.66 µg |
149.96 µg |
98.2 |
AD2 |
149.66 µg |
148.61 µg |
99.3 |
AD3 |
149.66 µg |
147.56 µg |
98.6 |
AD4 |
149.66 µg |
147.56 µg |
98.6 |
AD5 |
149.66 µg |
148.01 µg |
98.9 |
AD6 |
0.00 µg |
0.00 µg |
Blank |
|
|
Average
recover is 98.7% |
| 2.5 Retention efficiency
Six OVS-2 tubes were each
liquid spiked with 28 µL of a 5.345 mg/mL solution of methomyl in
acetonitrile by spiking the glass fiber filter. These tubes were then
sealed with plastic end caps and placed in a drawer at room temperature.
After overnight storage, 60 liters of humid air (approximately 70%
relative humidity) were drawn through each tube. Three of these tubes,
along with a blank tube, were then desorbed and analyzed as in Section
3. No methomyl was recovered from the backup section of these
tubes.
Table
2.5 |
Retention
Efficiency Study |
|
Tube # |
Amount spiked |
Amount recovered |
% Recovery |
|
RET1 |
149.66 µg |
146.22 µg |
97.7 |
RET2 |
149.66 µg |
162.23 µg |
108.4 |
RET3 |
149.66 µg |
153.70 µg |
102.7 |
RET4 |
0.00 µg |
0.00 µg |
Blank |
|
Average
recovery is 102.9% | 2.6 Sample storage
The remaining three spiked
tubes from Section 2.5 (and a blank tube) were stored for a total of 7
days in a-drawer at room temperature. They were then desorbed and
analyzed as in Section 3. No methomyl was recovered from the backup
section of these tubes.
Table 2.6
|
Storage
Study |
|
Tube # |
Amount spiked |
Amount recovered |
% Recovery |
|
ST1 |
149.66 µg |
partial
sample loss |
ST2 |
149.66 µg |
138.88 µg |
92.8 |
ST3 |
149.66 µg |
148.91 µg |
99.5 |
ST4 |
0.00 µg |
0.00 µg |
Blank |
|
Average
recovery (excluding ST1) is 96.2% |
| 2.7
Recommended air volume and sampling rate
2.7.1 The recommended air volume is 60 L.
2.7.2
The recommended flow rate is 1.0 L/min. 2.8 Interferences
(sampling)
It is not known if any compounds will interfere with
the collection of methomyl. Suspected interferences should be reported
to the laboratory with submitted samples.
2.9 Safety precautions
(sampling)
2.9.1 Attach the sampling equipment in such a manner that
it will not interfere with work performance or employee safety.
2.9.2 Follow all safety practices that apply to the work area
being sampled. 3.
Analytical Procedure
3.1 Apparatus
3.1.1 An HPLC equipped with a UV detector and a manual
or automatic injector. A Waters 510 pump, Waters 490E UV
detector and a Waters 712 autosampler were used in this
evaluation.
3.1.2 An HPLC column capable of separating
methomyl from any interferences. A (25-cm × 4.6-mm i.d.) Chromasil
C18 (5 micron) column was used in this evaluation.
3.1.3 An electronic integrator or other suitable means of
measuring detector response. A Hewlett-Packard 3357 data system was
used in this evaluation.
3.1.4 Vials, 4-mL glass with
PTFE-lined septa.
3.1.5 Volumetric flasks, pipets, and
syringes. 3.2 Reagents
3.2.1 Acetonitrile, HPLC grade.
3.2.2 Water, HPLC
grade. A Millipore Milli-Q system was used to prepare the
water in this evaluation.
3.2.3 Methomyl. A 99+% pure standard
from EPA was used in this evaluation. 3.3 Standard
preparation
Prepare stock standard solutions by adding
acetonitrile to preweighed amounts of methomyl. Prepare working range
standards by diluting stock solutions with acetonitrile. Store stock and
dilute standards in a freezer.
3.4 Sample preparation
3.4.1. Transfer the 13-mm glass fiber filter and the
270-mg sampling section of the tube to a 4-mL vial. Place the first
foam plug and the 140-mg backup section in a separate vial. A small
glass funnel can be used to facilitate the transfer of the adsorbent.
Discard the rear foam plug. Do not discard the glass sampling tube, it
can be reused.
3.4.2 Add 2.0 mL of acetonitrile to each
vial.
3.4.3 Seal the vials with PTFE-lined septa and allow
them to desorb for one hour. Shake the vials by hand periodically
during this time. 3.5 Analysis
3.5.1 Liquid chromatographic conditions
Column: |
25-cm x 4.6-mm i.d. stainless
steelcolumn packed with 5 micron Chromasil
C18 |
Mobile Phase: |
25% acetonitrile 75% water |
Flow rate: |
1 mL/minute |
UV detector: |
210 nm |
Retention time: |
4.7 minutes |
Injection volume: |
10 µL | 3.5.2 Chromatogram
3.6 Interferences (analytical)
3.6.1 Any compound having a retention time similar to that
of the analyte is a potential interference. Generally,
chromatographic conditions can be altered to separate interferences
from the analyte.
3.6.2 Retention time on a single column is
not proof of chemical identity. Analysis by an alternate HPLC column,
detection at another wavelength (for comparison of absorbance response
ratios) and confirmation by mass spectrometry are additional means of
identification. 3.7 Calculations
3.7.1 Construct a calibration curve by plotting detector
response versus standard concentration.
3.7.2 Determine
the concentration of methomyl in each sample from the calibration
curve. If methomyl is found on the backup section, make blank
corrections for each section separately before adding the results
together.
3.7.3 Determine the air concentration by the
following formula.
3.8 Safety precautions (analytical)
3.8.1 Avoid exposure to all standards.
3.8.2
Avoid exposure to all solvents.
3.8.3 Wear safety glasses at
all times. 4.
Recommendations for Further Study
4.1 Analysis at 235 nm is more sensitive (See UV spectrum).
This evaluation was done at 210 nm as methomyl was being evaluated along
with another carbamate pesticide which was more sensitive at this lower
wavelength.
4.2 A desorption study determining the recovery from
a 13-mm glass fiber filter in combination with 270 mg of XAD-2 should be
done. The resulting combined desorption efficiency is the value used
in Section 3.7.3.
4.3 This method should be fully
validated. 5. References
5.1 Burright, D.; Method #63, "Carbaryl"; OSHA Analytical
Laboratory, unpublished, 1987.
5.2 "OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES,
A Guide to their Recognition"; U.S. Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare; Public Health Service, Public Health Service Publication No.
1097, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, D.C., 1964; p 245.
5.3 "Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological
Exposure Indices", 5th ed.; American Conference of Governmental
Industrial Hygienists: Cincinnati, OH, 1986; p 363.
5.4 "Farm
Chemicals Handbook"; Meister Publishing Co.: Willoughby,OH, 1986; p
C153.
|