1. General
Discussion
1.1 Background
1.1.1 History of procedure
This evaluation was undertaken to determine the
effectiveness of the OVS-2 sampling tube as a sampling device for
disulfoton. It follows the procedure developed for several other
organophosphorus pesticides. (Ref. 5.1)
It should be noted that
in this evaluation for disulfoton several other analytes were also
present in the analytical procedure. These other analytes are not
mentioned in this evaluation, but can be seen on the sample
chromatogram.
1.1.2 Toxic effects (This section is for
information only and should not be taken as the basis of OSHA
policy). Organophosphorus pesticides act as irreversible
inhibitors of cholinesterase, thereby allowing the accumulation of
large amounts of acetylcholine. When a critical level of
cholinesterase depletion is reached, usually about 20% of normal,
symptoms and signs of acety1choline accumulation poisoning become
manifest. (Ref. 5.2) These symptoms may include blurred
vision, weakness, nausea, headache, abdominal cramps, chest
discomfort, and diarrhea. Signs may include miosis, muscle twitching,
salivation, sweating, tearing, cyanosis, convulsions, and coma. (Ref.
5.2) Besides being absorbed following inhalation or ingestion,
organophosphorus pesticides are readily absorbed through, the intact
skin. (Ref. 5.2) Disulfoton is a highly toxic chemical with an
acute oral LD50 for male rats of 6.8 mg/kg and females
rates of 2.3 mg/kg. The dermal LD50's are 25 and 6
mg/kg for male and female rats respectively. (Ref.5.3) Due to
these factors disulfoton has been given a TLV of 0.1 mg/m3
by the ACGIH (ref. 5.3)
1.1.3 Potential workplace exposure No
estimate of worker exposure to disulfoton could be found.
Disulfoton is used as a systemic insecticide and
acaricide.
1.1.4 Physical properties (Refs.
5.3-5.6)
Molecular weight: |
274.38 |
Molecular formula: |
C8H19O2PS3 |
CAS #: |
298-04-4 |
Boiling point: |
132-133°C at 1.5
mmHg |
Vapor Pressure: |
0.00018 mmHg at
20°C |
Appearance: |
colorless oily
liquid |
Solubility: |
insoluble in water
soluble in most organic solvents |
Synonyms: |
Disyston,
dithiodemeton, dithiosystox, Disyston, dithiodemeton,
dithios |
Chemical name: |
O,O-Diethyl
S-2-(ethylthio) ethyl phosphorodithioate |
Structure: |
| 1.2
Limit defining parameters
The
detection limit of analytical procedure is 0.6 ng per injection.
This is the amount of analyte which will give a peak whose height is
approximately five times the baseline noise. 2. Sampling procedure
2.1 Apparatus
2.1.1 Samples are collected by
using a personal sampling pump that can be calibrated to within ±5% of
the recommended flow rate with the sampling device in
line.
2.1.2 Samples are collected with OVS-2 tubes,
which are specially made 13-mm o.d. glass tubes, that are tapered to
6-mm o.d., packed with a 140-mg backup section and a 270-mg sampling
section of cleaned XAD-2 and a 13-mm diameter glass fiber filter. The
backup section is retained by two foam plugs and the sampling section
is between one foam plug and the glass fiber filter. The glass fiber
filter is held next to the sampling section by a
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) retainer.
2.2
Reagents No sampling reagents
are required.
2.3 Sampling
technique
2.3.1 Attach the small tubing adapter
of the sampling tube to the sampling pump with flexible, plastic
tubing such that the large, front section of the sampling tube is
exposed directly to the atmosphere. Do not place any tubing in front
of the sampler. The sampler should be attached vertically (large end
down) in the worker's breathing zone in such a manner that it does not
impede work performance.
2.3.2 After sampling for the
appropriate time, remove the sampling device and seal the tube with
plastic end caps.
2.3.3 Wrap each sample
end-to-end with an OSHA seal (Form 21)
2.3.4 With each
set of samples, submit at least one blank. The blank should be
handled the same as the other samples except that no air is drawn
through it.
2.3.5 Bulk samples should be submitted for
analysis in a separate container. Do not ship with the air
samples. 2.4 Extraction
efficiency
Two 13-mm glass fiber
filters were each spiked with 48.06 µg of disulfoton. The two
filters, along with a blank filter, were each extracted with 2 mL of
toluene in separate 4-mL vials which also contained 270 mg of XAD-2
adsorbent. The average extraction efficiency for these two filters (with
the XAD-2 adsorbent present, also) was 89%.
2.5 Retention efficiency
Two OVS-2 tubes were each spiked with 48.06 µg of
disulfoton by spiking the 13 mm glass fiber filter in the tube with the
analyte of interest. 350 liters of humid air was drawn through each
filter. The two filters were then extracted as above. The average
retention efficiency for these two filters was
8O%.
2.6 Sample
storage
Two OVS-2 tubes were
each spiked with 48.06 µg of disulfoton as above. 470 liters of
humid air was drawn through each filter. These two tubes were stored for
ten days at ambient temperature in a drawer. They were then
extracted as above. The average recovery after ten days of storage
was 77%.
2.7 Recommended
air volume and sampling rate
2.7.1 The recommended air volume is
480 L.
2.7.2 The recommended
flow rate is 1.0 L/min. 2.8
Interferences
It is not known if any compounds will
interfere with the collection of disulfoton. Suspected
interferences should be reported to the laboratory with submitted
samples. 2.9 Safety
precautions
2.9.1 Attach the sampling equipment in
such a manner that it will not interfere with work performance or
employee safety.
2.9.2 Follow all safety practices
that apply to the work area being sampled.
3. Analytical
procedure
3.1 Apparatus
3.1.1 A GC equipped with an FPD
detector operating in the phosphorus mode. A Hewlett-Packard
5730A GC fitted with an FPD was used in this evaluation.
Injections were performed using a Hewlett-Packard 7671A automatic
sampler.
3.1.2 A GC column capable of resolving
disulfoton from any interference. A 30-m × 0.53-mm i.d. DB-210
Megabore GC column, 1.0 µm thick film, was used in this evaluation and
is available from J&W Scientific, Inc., Rancho Cordova,
CA.
3.1.3 An electronic integrator or other suitable
means of measuring detector response. A Hewlett-Packard 3357 data
system was used in this evaluation.
3.1.4 Vials, 2-
and 4-mL glass with PTFE-lined septa.
3.1.5 Volumetric
flasks, pipets, and syringes for preparing standards, making
dilutions, and performing injections. 3.2 Reagents
3.2.1 Hydrogen, air, oxygen, and
nitrogen, GC grade. 3.2.2 Toluene. Pesticide grade.
3.2.3
Disulfoton, 98.1% pure (Chem Services Inc.).
3.3 Standard
preparation
Stock standard solutions
are prepared by adding toluene to preweighed amounts of disulfoton.
Working range standard solutions are prepared by diluting stock
solutions with toluene. Stock and dilute standards are stored in a
freezer.
3.4 Sample
preparation
3.4.1 Transfer the 13-mm glass
fiber filter and the 270-mg section of the sampling tube to a 4-mL
vial. Place the first foam plug and the 140-mg section in a
separate vial. A small glass funnel can be used to facilitate
the transfer of the adsorbent. Discard the rear foam plug.
Do not discard the glass sampling tube; it can be reused after it has
been cleaned with surfactant or suitable
solvent.
3.4.2 Add 2.0 mL of toluene to
each vial. 3.4.3 Seal the vials with PTFE-lined septa and allow
them to extract for one hour. Shake the vials by hand with
vigorous force periodically during the one hour extraction
time. 3.5
Analysis
3.5.1 GC conditions
Column temperature:
(initial) |
150°C |
Temperature program
rate: |
8°C/min |
Column temperature:
(final) |
200°C |
Injector temperature: |
200°C |
Nitrogen flow rate: |
5 mL/min |
Initial hold time: |
0 min |
Final hold time: |
4 min |
Injection volume: |
1.3 µL |
GC column: |
30-m × 0.53-mm i.d.
DB-21 Megabore, 1.0-µm thick film |
FPD conditions: |
|
Hydrogen flow rate |
200 mL/min |
Oxygen flow rate: |
60 mL/min |
Air flow rate: |
30 mL/min |
Detector temperature: |
300°C |
Retention time: |
6.0
min |
3.5.2 Chromatogram
3.6 Interferences
3.6.1 Any compound having a similar
retention time to the analyte is a potential interference.
Generally, chromatographic conditions can be altered to separate
an interference from the analyte.
3.6.2 Retention
time on a single column is not proof of chemical identity.
Analysis by an alternate GC column, detection by an FPD in the sulfur
mode for the sulfur containing pesticides, and confirmation by mass
spectrometry are additional means of identification.
3.7 Calculations
3.7.1 A calibration curve is
constructed by plotting detector response versus standard
concentration.
3.7.2 The concentration of
disulfoton in a sample is determined from the calibration curve.
If disulfoton is found on the backup section, it is added to the
amount found on the front section. Blank corrections for each
section should be performed before adding the results together.
3.7.3 The air concentration is then determined by the
following formula.
3.8 Safety
precautions
3.8.1 Avoid exposure to all
standards.
3.8.2 Avoid exposure to all solvents.
3.8.3 Wear safety glasses at all times.
4. Recommendations for
further study
There appears
to be some loss of disulfoton with increased sampling time and/or storage
time at ambient temperature. More statistically valid retention and
storage studies should be done to clarify this loss of analyte. This
method should be fully validated.
5. References
5.1 Burright, D., Method #62,
"Clorphyrifos, DDVP, Diazinon, Malathion, and Parathion", OSHA
Analytical Laboratory, unpublished, 1986.
5.2
"OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES, A Guide to their Recognition", U.S. Department
of Health, Education, and Welfare; Public Health Service, Public Heath
Service Publication No. 1097, U.S. Government Printing Office,
Washington, D.C., 1965.
5.3 "Documentation of the Threshold
Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices", American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists Inc., fifth edition,
1986.
5.4 Farm Chemicals Handbook, Meister Publishing Co.,
1985.
5.5 Windholz, M., Ed. "Merck Index", 10th ed.; Merck
and Co., Rahway, NJ, 1983.
5.6 "Chemical Information File",
U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
Directorate of Science, Technology and Medicine, June 14, 1985.
|