1.1 Background

1.1.1 History of procedure 

The OSHA lab has been recommending collection of N,N-dimethylethylamine with a 0.1 N H₂SO₄ bubbler following the NIOSH method (S 152) for collection of triethylamine (Ref 5.1). A paper by P.W. Langvardt and R.G. Melcher recommends collection and analysis of ethanolamines and isopropanolamines using alumina tubes (Ref 5.2). Adsorbent tubes are more convenient, so alumina tubes were tried as a collection media for N,N-dimethylethylamine. Different means of desorption and analysis were used than the in the paper (Ref 5.2), since the analyte of interest was N,N-dimethylethylamine. Alumina tubes in this study were desorbed with either 0.1 N H₂SO₄ or deionized water. Analysis was by GC-NPD. Two different lots and sizes of alumina tubes were tried, because the capacity was different for the two lots. Lot 190 had a greater capacity, 6 liters with humid air (93% RH), but is no longer available, so lot 391 jumbo tubes were evaluated. The desorption efficiency and the storage were good for both lots studied. 

1.1.2 Potential workplace exposure (Ref 5.3) N,N-dimethylethylamine is used in urea- and melamine-based enamels, as an antilivering agent. N,N-dimethylethylamine is used in foundries. 

1.1.3 Toxic Effects (This section is f or information purposes and should not be taken as the basis for OSHA policy.) (Ref 5.3) N,N-dimethylethylamine has toxic effects similar to triethylamine, which causes corneal damage, pulmonary irritation, cellular necrosis of the liver and kidneys, and skin irritation. 

1.1.4 Physical properties (Ref 5.4): 
Structure: 

Molecular weight:	73.14
Density:	0.675
Boiling point:	37°C
Melting point:	-140°C
Odor:	strong ammoniacal odor
Color:	clear liquid
Molecular formula:	C4H11N
CAS:	598-56-1
IMIS:	0915
Flash point:	-36°C

1.2 Limit defining parameters 

1.2.1 The detection limit of the analytical procedure is 5 ng, with a 1 µL injection volume. This is the smallest amount which could be detected under normal operating conditions.

1.2.2 The overall detection limit is 0.3 ppm based on a 10 liter air volume. 

1.3 Advantages 

1.3.1 The sampling procedure is convenient. 

1.3.2 The analytical method is reproducible and sensitive.

1.3.3 Reanalysis of samples is possible. 

1.3.4 It may be possible to analyze other compounds at the same time. 

1.3.5 Interferences may be avoided by proper selection of column and GC parameters. 

1.4 Disadvantages 

None known.

2.1 Apparatus 

2.1.1 A calibrated personal sampling pump, the flow of which can be determined within ±5% at the recommended flow. 

2.1.2 Alumina tubes, lot 391, containing 400-mg adsorbing section with a 200 mg backup section separated by a 2-mm portion of urethane foam, with a silane treated glass wool plug before the adsorbing section and a 3 mm plug of urethane foam at the back of the backup section. The ends are flame sealed and the glass tube containing the adsorbent is 11-cm long, with a 8-mm O.D. and 6-mm I.D., SKC tubes or equivalent. 

2.2 Sampling technique 

2.2.1 The ends of the alumina tubes are opened immediately before sampling. 

2.2.2 Connect the alumina tube to the sampling pump with flexible tubing. 

2.2.3 Tubes should be placed in a vertical position to minimize channeling, with the smaller 
section towards the pump. 

2.2 4 Air being sampled should not pass through any hose or tubing before entering the alumina tube.

2.2.5 Seal the alumina tube with plastic caps immediately after sampling. Seal each sample lengthwise with OSHA Form-21. 

2.2 6 With each batch of samples, submit at least one blank tube from the same lot used for air samples. This tube should be subjected to exactly the same handling as the samples (break ends, seal, and transport) except that no air is drawn through it. 

2.2.7 Transport the samples (and corresponding paperwork) to the lab for analysis. 

2.2.8 Bulks submitted for analysis must be shipped in a separate container from the samples. 

2.3 Desorption efficiency 

A desorption efficiency of the 400/200 mg size alumina tube, lot 391, was performed with spikes of 0.3375, 0.675, and 1.35 mg of N,N-dimethylethylamine. The tubes were stored at room temperature overnight. They were opened, each section placed into a separate 4 mL vial, and desorbed with 2 mL deionized water. They were allowed to desorb for 30 minutes with occasional shaking, and then analyzed by GC-NPD (Table 2.3). The overall average desorption was 97.9%.

Table 2.3 Desorption Study Lot 391

Tube#	0.3375mg	% Recovered  0.675mg	1.35mg
1	97.3	97.2	93.1
2	100	103	93.7
3	99.8	98.4	96.6
4	102	101	95.8
5	97.4	97.5	98.6
6	99.5	97.9	93.3
average	99.3	99.2	95.2
overall average		97.9
standard deviation		±2.80

2.4 Retention efficiency 

Retention efficiency of lot 391 jumbo alumina tubes was performed by spiking 0.675 mg N,N-dimethylethylamine onto alumina tubes and drawing 4 liters of humid air, 94 % RH, through them. They were opened, each section placed into a separate 4 mL vial, and desorbed with 2 mL deionized water . They were allowed to desorb for 30 minutes with occasional shaking, and then analyzed by GC-NPD. While there was N,N-dimethylethylamine found on the backup portion of the alumina tubes, the amount recovered averaged 96.3% (Table 2.4). The recoveries are corrected for desorption efficiency.

Table 2.4 Retention Efficiency Lot 391

Tube #	% Recovered 'A'	% Recovered 'B'	% Total
1	89.5	9.3	98.8
2	79.9	18.5	98.2
3	78.1	16.6	94.7
4	83.7	12.3	96.0
5	88.9	4.8	93.7
6	lost in analysis
		average	97.7

2.5 Storage 

Storage stability for lot 391 jumbo alumina tubes was performed by spiking 0.675 mg N,N-dimethylethylamine on the tubes, and storing them at room temperature. The tubes were opened, each section placed into separate 4 mL vials, and desorbed with 2 mL deionized water. They were allowed to desorb for 30 minutes with occasional shaking, and then analyzed by GC-NPD. The storage stability remained above 95% for the 14 days studied (Table 2.5). The values in the table are corrected for desorption efficiency.

Table 2.5 Storage with lot 391 Alumina Tubes

Day	% Recovered
5	99.6
5	97.1
5	96.2
14	96.4
14	95.9
14	101
average	97.7

2.6 Air volume and sampling rate studied 

2.6.1 The air volume studied was 4 liters. 

2.6.2 The sampling rate studied was 0.1 liter per minute. 

2.7 Interferences 

Suspected interferences should be listed on sample data sheets. 

2.8 Safety precautions 

2.8.1 Sampling equipment should be placed on an employee in a manner that does not interfere with work performance or safety. 

2.8.2 Safety glasses should be worn at all times. 

2.8.3 Follow all safety practices that apply to the workplace being sampled. 

3.1 Apparatus 

3.1.1 Gas chromatograph equipped with a nitrogen-phosphorous detector. 

3.1.2 GC column capable of separating the analyte from  any interferences. A 6-ft glass column packed with 4% Carbowax 20M, 0.8% KOH on Carbopack B was used for this study.

3.1.3 An electronic integrator or some other suitable method of measuring peak areas. 

3.1.4 Four milliliter vials with Teflon-lined caps for sample desorption. 

3.1.5 A 10 µL syringe or other convenient size for sample injection. 

3.1.6 Pipets for dispensing the desorbing solution. 

3.1.7 Volumetric flasks - 5 mL and other convenient sizes for preparing standards. 

3.2 Reagents 

3.2.1 Purified GC grade nitrogen, hydrogen, and air. 

3.2.2 Deionized water. 

3.2.3 Reagent grade N,N-dimethylethylamine. 

3.3 Sample preparation 

3.3.1 Jumbo alumina tubes are opened and the front and back section of each tube are placed in separate 4 mL vials.

3.3.2 Each section of the tube is desorbed with 2 mL deionized water. 

3.3.3 The vials are sealed immediately and allowed to desorb for 30 minutes with occasional shaking. 

3.4 Standard preparation 

3.4.1 Standards are prepared by diluting a known quantity of N,N-dimethylethylamine with deionized water. 

3.4.2 At least four separate standards should be made from at least two separate stock standards. A curve is plotted, since the response can be non-linear on a NPD. 

3.4.3 A standard of 337.5 µg/mL (0.5 µL/mL) N,N-dimethylethylamine in water corresponds to 57.62 ppm based on a 4 liter air volume, 2 mL desorption volume, and a 97.9% desorption efficiency for lot 391 jumbo tubes. 

3.5 Analysis 

3.5.1 Gas chromatograph conditions. 

Flow rates (mL/min)		Temperature (°C)
Nitrogen:	24	Injector:	200
Hydrogen:	3	Detector:	220
Air:	50	Column:	120
Injection size:	1 µL
Elution time:	3.12 min
Chromatogram:

Figure 1. Standard of 675 µg/mL N,N-dimethylethylamine in water.
3.5.2 Peak areas are measured by an integrator or other suitable means.

3.6 Interferences (analytical)

3.6.1 Any compound having the general retention time of the analyte used is an interference. Possible interferences should be listed on the sample data sheet. GC parameters should be adjusted if necessary so these interferences will pose no problems.

3.6.2 Retention time data on a single column is not considered proof of chemical identity. Samples over the target concentration should be confirmed by GC/Mass Spec or other suitable means.

3.7 Calculations

3.7.1 Standards are plotted on a curve and the micrograms/milliliter of the samples are taken from the curve.

3.7.2 To calculate the concentration of analyte in the air sample the following formulas are used:



3.7.3 The above formulas can be consolidated to form the following formula. To calculate the ppm of analyte in the sample based on a 10 liter air sample:

µg/mL	=	concentration of analyte in sample or standard
24.46	=	Molar volume (liters/mole) at 25°C and 760 mmHg.
MW	=	Molecular weight (g/mole)
DV	=	Desorption volume
4 L	=	10 liter air sample
DE	=	Desorption efficiency

3.7.4 This calculation is done for each section of the sampling tube and the results added together.

3.8 Safety precautions

3.8.1 All handling of solvents should be done in a hood.

3.8.2 Avoid skin contact with all solvents.

3.8.3 Wear safety glasses at all times.

Collection efficiencies should be performed. Any lot of alumina tubes other than the ones in this study should be checked for retention efficiency before used in the field.

5.1 "NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods", U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Second Edition, Vol. 3., Method S152.

5.2 Langvardt, P.W., Melcher, R.G., Anal. Chem., 1980, vol. 52, p. 669.

5.3 Proctor, N.H., Hughes, J.P., "Chemical Hazards of the Workplace", J.B. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia PA, 1978, p. 497.

5.4 Weast, R.C., "Handbook of Chemistry and Physics", 67^th Edition, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton FL, 1986, p. C247.