1. Introduction
1.1 Scope
This method describes the collection and
analysis of airborne particulates containing soluble uranium. The
technique used for this analysis is Differential Pulse Cathodic
Stripping Polarography (DPCSP). This technique involves the reduction of
hexavalent uranium (U6+) on the surface of a static mercury
electrode (SME) drop (7-1). The electrolyte solution used in the
analysis contains 0.05 M tartaric acid and 0.05 M triethanolamine; it is
weakly acidic, with a pH = 3.5. The electrolyte solution is used to
extract soluble uranium from the sample filters, because it has been
found experimentally to give better recoveries as compared to extraction
using deionized water (DIW) (7.2). For this reason soluble uranium is
defined in the context of this analytical procedure as that uranium
which will dissolve in an aqueous solution containing 0.05 M tartaric
acid and 0.05 M triethanolamine. Refer to BUD (7.2) for more
details.
1.2 History
Uranium samples sent to the OSHA
Laboratory have been analyzed by the method of neutron activation (7.3).
Using that technique, samples prepared at OSHA must be sent to a local
University reactor to be bombarded by neutrons. The uranium can then be
quantitated by counting the number of disintegrations occurring at
energy levels specific for uranium. This method gives good quantitative
results, but it is relatively time-consuming and expensive. Also,
samples must be given up for a time to non-OSHA personnel: For these
reasons, a polarographic procedure was developed at the OSHA
Laboratory.
1.3 Toxic Effects (7.4, 7.5)
1.3.1 Toxicity is closely related to solubility, i.e., the
more soluble the uranium compound is, the more toxic it
becomes.
1.3.2 Soluble uranium compounds are toxic both when
breathed or ingested. The kidney is the organ most directly affected
by uranium, which causes tubular degeneration and renal
failure.
1.3.3 The administration of calcium disodium edetate
is useful for removing uranium from the body.
1.3.4 Of the most
important uranium compounds used industrially, UF6 and
UO2(NO3)2 · 6H20 are the most toxic, whereas
UO3 is only moderately toxic, and UO2,
U308, and UF4 are considered low in
toxicity. 1.4 Physical Properties (7.4, 7.6, 7.7)
1.4.1 Uranium, atomic number 92, has an atomic weight of
238. It has a density of 19.05 and a melting point of 1132 °C. It is a
silvery, lustrous, malleable, and ductile metal. It occurs in the
earth's crust at a concentration of about 2 ppm.
1.4.2 In the
dry state uranium forms compounds having valences of 3+, 4+, 5+, or
6+. In aqueous media only U4+ and U6+ are
stable. Some compounds, such as UCI4, decompose in aqueous
media to the U6+ state (see Table 5). In acid solution and
in the body, the oxygen-containing cation UO2+2
, where uranium has a valence of 6+, is the predominant form. In
general, hexavalent uranium compounds are the most soluble.
2. Range and Detection Limit
2.1 The working range is from 0.05 ppm to 2.0 ppm
uranium.
2.2 The qualitative detection limit for a 10 mL sample
is estimated to be 0.2 µg, based on the lowest quantity of uranium which
produces a discernable peak. Refer to Figure 1 in the BUD (7.2) for
better illustrative detail. 3. Precision and Accuracy
3.1 Quantities of soluble uranium were spiked onto FWS-B
filters at levels corresponding to 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 times the OSHA-PEL,
based upon a 240 L air sample. At each of the three PEL levels, 6
filters were used, giving a total of 18 filters for a complete set. Two
complete sets of filters were analyzed for uranium recovery. Refer to
Back-up Data (BUD) for complete results (7.2).
3.2 The pooled
coefficient of variation (CV) for the two sets (n=36), a measure of
total analytical precision, was calculated to be 0.036. This value
corresponds to a standard deviation of 0.0018 mg/m³ at the OSHA-PEL
standard level.
3.3 The average recovery for the two sets at the
three OSHA-PEL levels (n=36) was 98.4%. 4. Advantages and
Disadvantages
4.1 Advantages
4.1.1 This procedure is relatively quick, simple, and
exhibits good reproducibility over the working range.
4.1.2 The
method of DPCSP saves on mercury by performing a complete analysis
with one mercury drop.
4.1.3 The chain of evidence stays within
OSHA, i.e., samples are not sent out of the Laboratory for
analysis. 4.2 Disadvantages
4.2.1 Small changes in pH (> O.2 pH) will cause a
reduction in signal intensity. This change is minimized by the
buffering capacity of the electrolyte solution. However, it is
necessary for the analyst to check the pH of each sample with pH
paper. If the pH of the sample differs by more than 0.2 pH units from
the electrolyte solution, small amounts of acid or base should be
added to the sample until its pH is close to that of the
electrolyte.
4.2.2 It has been determined experimentally that
the presence of certain ions (Cr6+, Mo6+,
Ti4+, and F¯ at concentrations one to four times that of
the uranium will also result in a reduction in signal intensity (7.2,
7.8). The three metal cations all have half-wave potentials more
negative than that of hexavalent uranium. High concentrations of these
interfering cations will produce separate peaks from that of uranium.
At concentrations near to that of uranium, however, varying degrees of
shoulder-broadening can be seen on the uranium peak.
5. Sampling Procedure
5.1 Apparatus
5.1.1 Personal Sampling Pump: A calibrated pump whose flow
rate an be determined within 5% at the recommended flow rate. Each
personal sampling pump must be calibrated with a representative
sampler (filter, sorbent tube, etc.) in line to minimize errors
associated with uncertainties in the volume sampled.
5.1.2
Filter holder: A 3-piece polystyrene, 37 mm diameter cassette.
5.1.3 Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) membrane filters: 5.0 micron
pore size, 37 mm diameter. FWS-B or equivalent. 5.2
Procedure
5.2.1 Sample at a known flow rate of about 2 L/min. A
minimum sample size of 100 L is recommended.
5.2.2 Include a
blank FWS-B filter with each sample set.
5.2-3 After sampling,
plug the cassette ports and seal the cassettes with official seals
(OSHA Form 21). Send to the laboratory for
analysis. 6. Analytical Procedure
6.1 Apparatus
6.1.1 Polarographic analyzer or controller: Princeton
Applied Research (PAR), Model 384-B, or equivalent.
6.1.2
Static mercury drop electrode: PAR Model 303A
6.1.3
Polarographic cells (20-mL). Soak used cells in 6 M HNO3
for one hour and rinse thoroughly with DIW. Air dry on clean absorbent
paper.
6.1.4 Digital plotter: Model DMP-40, Houston Instrument,
or equivalent.
6.1.5 Adjustable micropipettes: Gilson P-200
& P-5000, or equivalent. 6.2 Reagents - All chemicals
should be ACS reagent grade or equivalent.
6.2.1 Uranium stock solution, 1000 ppm: Purchased from
Spex, prepared from HiPure material, in a 2% HNO3 matrix.
This solution is good for one year.
6.2.2 Supporting
electrolyte: 0.05 M Tartaric acid + 0.05 M Triethanolamine. Dissolve
7.50 g Tartaric acid and 7.46 g Triethanolamine in 1 L DIW. Keep
closed and prepare fresh when needed. Microorganismic growth can be
observed in the solution after about a week. Although this growth does
not appear to interfere with the analysis, the reagent should be
discarded if growth is noticed.
6.2.3 Mercury,
triple-distilled. 6.3 Precautions
6.3.1 Clean all glassware with a 10% HNO3
solution and rinse several times with DIW. Air dry prior to
use.
6.3.2 Wear gloves when handling soluble uranium compounds.
Danger from radioactivity is minimal, but the soluble compounds are
themselves toxic.
6.3.3 Mercury wastes can be temporarily
placed in a beaker inside a fume hood that is left on. Permanent
storage requires that the waste be placed in a securely closed metal
container provided for that purpose.
6.3.4 Promptly clean up
any spill of uranium solution that occurs by wiping it up with
absorbent paper.
6.3.5 Remove any visible mercury drops that
appear by auctioning with the vacuum hose provided for that
purpose. 6.4 Sample preparation
6.4.1 Remove FWS-B filter from cassette and place in 125
mL Phillips beaker. Add 5 mL aliquot of electrolyte and extract for 30
minutes, with occasional swirling.
6.4.2 Transfer electrolyte
to 25 mL volumetric flask. Rinse beaker with two more 5 mL aliquots of
electrolyte and transfer these to volumetric flask. Bring flask to
volume with electrolyte. 6.5 Standard Preparation
6.5.1 Standards in the range 0.5 - 10.0 µg should normally
be analyzed. For a 10 mL cell volume, this corresponds to a
concentration range of 0.05 - 1.0 ppm.
6.5.2 Prepare stock
standards of 1.0, 10, and 100 ppm U by serial dilution of the 1000 ppm
stock solution using DIW. Standards can be kept for six months.
6.5.3 Using calibrated pipettes, add appropriate aliquots of
the stock standards to polarographic cells and bring to 10 ML volume
with electrolyte solution as shown:
Stock
Std. (µg/mL) |
U
Aliquot (µL) |
Electrolyte (mL) |
Final U
Quantity in Cell (µg) |
|
1.0 |
|
500 |
|
9.50 |
0.5 |
|
10 |
|
100 |
|
9.90 |
1.0 |
|
10 |
|
200 |
|
9.80 |
2.0 |
|
10 |
|
500 |
|
9.50 |
5.0 |
|
100 |
|
100 |
|
9.90 |
10.0 |
| 6.6
Analysis
6.6.1 Turn on the polarographic analyzer, 384-B, and allow
it to warm up for about 45 minutes. Prior to analysis, turn on the
digital plotter and prepare it with pen and paper.
6.6.2 The
necessary parameters for analyzing soluble uranium by DPCSP have been
entered into the memory of the 384-B. Recall the method number which
analyzes soluble uranium and check the parameters to see that they
correspond to the following conditions:
Analytical Technique: |
Differential Pulse Stripping (DPS) |
Initial Potential: |
Approx. -0.050 V |
Final Potential: |
Approx. -0.330 V |
Scan Rate: |
2 mV/sec |
Replications: |
1 |
Pulse Height: |
0.1 V |
Purge Time: |
90 sec |
Equilibrium Time: |
5 sec | 6.6.3 The half-wave potential for uranium (VI) in this
electrolyte (pH=3.5) is approx. -0.2 V vs. a Saturated Calomel
Electrode (SCE). The actual peak voltage may differ a little from this
value depending upon the condition of the reference electrode
used.
6.6.4 Analyze the reagent blank and-several standards
before analyzing samples. Analyze a standard after every five or six
samples.
6.6.5 Check the pH of each sample with pH paper before
analyzing it. If the pH of the sample differs by > 0.2 pH units
from the reagent blank, add small quantities of acid (HNO3)
or base (NaOH) until the pH of the sample is the same as the reagent
blank.
6.6.6 Record the peak current (nA) and voltage of the
peak (V) for each standard and sample. A form is provided for this
purpose.
6.6.7 If non-uranium peaks occur or if the uranium
peak shows signs of broadening, interferences should be suspected
(4.2.2) and the sample should be analyzed by ICP or AA to determine
the possibility and/or extent of the interference.
6.6.8 Plot a
calibration curve of peak current (nA) vs. amount of standard
(µg). 6.7 Calculations
6.7.1 Use the Colorimetric program or equivalent to plot a
calibration curve (6.6.8).
6.7.2 Blank correct each air sample
and wipe.
6.7.3 The concentration of soluble uranium in the
sampled air is expressed as mg/m³.
U (mg/m³) = |
total µg U (blank corrected)
air volume (L) | 7. References
7.1 Peterson, W.M., and R.V. Wong: Fundamentals of Stripping
Voltammetry. American Laboratory, pp. 116-128
(Nov., 1981).
7.2 Backup Data Report No. for Soluble Uranium,
prepared by Phil Giles, Inorganic Division, Branch I.
7.3
"Neutron Activation Analysis," OSHA Manual of Analytical Methods
(unpublished), USDOL OSHA, Salt Lake City Analytical
Laboratory.
7.4 Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology Vol.
IIA, 3rd Revised Edition, pp. 1995-2012 (1981).
7.5 Clinical
Toxicology of Commercial Products, 4th Edition, pp.102- 103
(1976).
7.6 Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Vol.
23, 3 rd Edition, pp. 512-513 (1983).
7.7 Merck Index, 10th Edition, 1983, P. 9666.
7.8
"Determination of Uranium in Plutoniurw-238 Metal and Oxide by
Differential Pulse Polarography," Analytical
Chemistry, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 215-218 (Jan., 1976).
|