|
Method no.: |
PV2131 |
|
|
Control no.: |
T-PV2131-01-04010-M |
|
|
Target Concentration: |
1 mg/m3 |
|
|
Procedure: |
Samples are collected by drawing
a known volume of air through glass sampling tubes containing
Chromosorb 106. Samples are extracted with a solution of 99:1
carbon disulfide:N,N-dimethyl
formamide and analyzed by GC using a flame ionization detector
(GC/FID). |
|
|
Sampling rate: |
240 min at 0.2 L/min (48
L) |
|
|
Reliable quantitation
limit: |
33 µg/m3
|
|
|
Status of method: |
Partially evaluated method. This
method has been subjected to established evaluation procedures
of the Methods Development Team and is presented for
information and trial use. |
|
|
January 2004 |
Mary E. Eide |
Methods Development Team Industrial Hygiene
Chemistry Division OSHA Salt Lake Technical Center Sandy
UT 84070-6406
|
1.
General Discussion
1.1 Background
1.1.1 History
Air samples collected using Chromosorb 106
tubes were received at OSHA SLTC with requested analysis
for tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate. This partially-validated
work was performed because SLTC had no sampling and
analytical method for tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate.
The result of a preliminary extraction efficiency
study for tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate extracted from dry
Chromosorb 106 with carbon disulfide was 98% recovery. The
test was repeated with wet Chromosorb 106 and the recovery
was initially the same, but then decreased to 85% when the
samples were allowed to stand. The source of dry
Chromosorb 106 was sampling tubes as received from SKC
Inc. The source of wet Chromosorb 106 was dry Chromosorb
106 sampling tubes which had clean, humid air drawn
through them. The extraction solvent was changed from pure
carbon disulfide to 99:1 carbon disulfide:N,N-dimethylformamide and the wet
Chromosorb 106 extraction efficiency test was repeated.
The results of this test showed no decrease in recovery;
therefore, the 99:1 carbon disulfide:N,N-dimethylformamide extraction
solvent was selected for use in this work. The extraction
efficiency was 98.6% using the 99:1 carbon disulfide:N,N-dimethylformamide extraction
solvent.
Tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate was found to
be well retained on Chromosorb 106, with a retention
efficiency recovery of 99.1% and the storage stability
recovery of 97.5% on day 14 of ambient storage.
1.1.2 Toxic effects (This section is for
information only and should not be taken as the basis of
OSHA policy.)1
Tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate is a contact irritant
affecting the skin, eyes, and mucous membranes, and may
cause sensitization through skin contact in certain
individuals. If swallowed it causes irritation of the
gastrointestinal tract, causing nausea, and vomiting.
1.1.3 Workplace exposure2
Tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate is used as an
intermediate in the manufacture of plasticizers and
coating materials, and printing materials.
1.1.4
Physical properties and other descriptive
information1
CAS number: 2399-48-6 Synonyms3:
2-propenoic acid, (tetrahydro-2-furanyl)methyl ester;
2-propenoic acid, tetrahydrofurfuryl ester.
solubility: |
insoluble in water, soluble in organic
solvents |
molecular weight: |
156.18 |
density: |
1.064 g/mL |
boiling point: |
87 °C |
flash point: |
110 °C (230 °F)(closed
cup) |
appearance: |
clear liquid |
molecular formula: |
C8H12O3 |
odor: |
musty |
IMIS4: |
T420 | Structural Formula:
This method was evaluated according to the
OSHA SLTC "Evaluation Guidelines for Air Sampling Methods
Utilizing Chromatographic Analysis"5.
The Guidelines define analytical parameters, specify required
laboratory tests, statistical calculations and acceptance
criteria. The analyte air concentrations throughout this
method are based on the recommended sampling and analytical
parameters.
1.2 Detection limit of the
overall procedure (DLOP) and reliable quantitation limit
(RQL)
The DLOP is measured as mass per sample and
expressed as equivalent air concentrations, based on the
recommended sampling parameters. Ten samplers were spiked
with equally descending increments of analyte, such that the
highest sampler loading was 10.6 µg of tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate. This is the
amount spiked on a sampler that would produce a peak at
least 10 times the response for a sample blank. These spiked
samplers were analyzed with the recommended analytical
parameters, and the data obtained used to calculate the
required parameters (standard error of estimate and slope)
for the calculation of the DLOP. The slope was 869 and the
SEE was 137. The RQL is considered the lower limit for
precise quantitative measurements. It is determined from the
regression line parameters obtained for the calculation of
the DLOP, providing 75% to 125% of the analyte is recovered.
The DLOP and RQL were 0.47 µg (10 µg/m3) and 1.58
µg (33 µg/m3) respectively. The recovery at the
RQL level was 95.4%.
Table 1.2 Detection Limit of the Overall
Procedure for Tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate
|
mass per sample (µg) |
area counts (µV-s) |
|
0.00 |
0 |
1.06 |
904 |
2.13 |
1797 |
3.19 |
2639 |
4.26 |
3482 |
5.32 |
4512 |
6.38 |
5453 |
7.45 |
6297 |
8.51 |
7249 |
9.58 |
8091 |
10.6 |
9478 |
|
Figure 1.2.1
Plot of the data to
determine the DLOP/RQL for tetrahydrofurfuryl
acrylate. (y = 869x –
89.0) | The
RQL is considered the lower limit for precise quantitative
measurements. It is determined from the regression line
parameters obtained for the calculation of the DLOP. The
recovery at the RQL was 95.4%. Below is the chromatogram of
the RQL level.
Figure 1.2.2
Chromatogram of the
tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate near the RQL. (Key: (1)
tetrahydrofurfuryl
acrylate) | 2. Sampling Procedure
All safety
practices that apply to the work area being sampled should be
followed. The sampling equipment should be attached to the
worker in such a manner that it will not interfere with work
performance or safety.
2.1 Apparatus
Samples are collected
using a personal sampling pump calibrated, with the sampling
device attached, to within ± 5% of the recommended flow
rate.
Samples are collected with 7-cm × 4-mm i.d. ×
7-mm o.d. glass sampling tubes packed with two sections
(100/50 mg) of Chromosorb 106. The sections are held in
place with foam plugs with a glass wool plug at the front.
For this evaluation, commercially prepared sampling tubes
were purchased from SKC, Inc. (catalogue no. 226-110 lot
2573).
2.2 Reagents
None required.
2.3 Technique
Immediately before sampling
break off the ends of the flame-sealed tube to provide an
opening approximately half the internal diameter of the
tube. Wear eye protection when breaking the tube. Use tube
holders to minimize the hazard of broken glass. All tubes
should be from the same lot.
The smaller section of
the adsorbent tube is used as a back-up and is positioned
nearest the sampling pump. Attach the tube holder to the
sampling pump so that the adsorbent tube is in an
approximately vertical position with the inlet facing down
during sampling. Position the sampling pump, tube holder,
and tubing so they do not impede work performance or safety.
Draw the air to be sampled directly into the inlet
of the tube holder. The air being sampled is not to be
passed through any hose or tubing before entering the
sampling tube.
After sampling for the appropriate
time, remove the adsorbent tube and seal it with plastic end
caps. Seal each sample end-to-end with an OSHA-21 form as
soon as possible.
Submit at least one blank sample
with each set of samples. Handle the blank sample in the
same manner as the other samples except draw no air through
it.
Record sample air volumes (liters), sampling
time (minutes), and sampling rate (L/min) for each sample,
along with any potential interferences on the OSHA-91A form.
Submit the samples to the laboratory for analysis as
soon as possible after sampling. If delay is unavoidable,
store the samples at refrigerator temperature. Ship any bulk
samples separate from the air samples.
2.4
Extraction efficiency
The extraction efficiency was
determined by spiking Chromosorb 106 tubes with
tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate at 0.1 to 2 times the target
concentration. These samples were stored overnight at
ambient temperature and then extracted with 1 mL of the
extracting solvent for 30 minutes with shaking, and
analyzed. The mean extraction efficiency over the studied
range was 98.6%. The wet extraction efficiency was
determined at the target concentration by liquid spiking the
analyte onto Chromosorb 106 tubes which had 48-L humid air
(absolute humidity of 15.9 mg/L of water, about 80% relative
humidity at 22.2 °C) drawn through them immediately before
spiking. The mean recovery for the wet samples was 98.6%.
Table
2.4 Extraction Efficiency (%) of Tetrahydrofurfuryl
Acrylate
|
level
|
sample number
|
x Target concn |
µg per Sample |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
mean |
|
0.1 |
5.3 |
98.8 |
97.1 |
97.2 |
97.3 |
99.9 |
99.6 |
98.3 |
0.5 |
26.6 |
98.5 |
98.7 |
99.3 |
99.0 |
99.9 |
99.7 |
99.2 |
1.0 |
53.2 |
98.5 |
98.2 |
98.4 |
98.3 |
98.9 |
98.8 |
98.5 |
1.5 |
79.8 |
98.9 |
97.8 |
99.2 |
98.4 |
98.7 |
98.9 |
98.7 |
2.0 |
106 |
98.4 |
98.1 |
97.9 |
98.9 |
98.7 |
99.6 |
98.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 (wet) |
53.2 |
98.8 |
98.4 |
98.1 |
98.9 |
99.9 |
98.2 |
98.6 |
| 2.5
Retention efficiency
Six Chromosorb 106 tubes had
their front sections spiked with 106 µg (2.21
mg/m3) of tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate and allowed
to equilibrate for 6 h. The tubes had 48-L humid air
(absolute humidity of 15.9 mg/L of water, about 80% relative
humidity at 22.2 °C) pulled through them at 0.2 L/min. The
samples were extracted and analyzed. The mean recovery was
99.1%. There was no analyte found on the back-up section of
any of the tubes.
Table 2.5 Retention Efficiency (%) of
Tetrahydrofurfuryl Acrylate
|
sample number
|
section |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
mean |
|
front |
99.4 |
100.2 |
98.7 |
99.3 |
99.3 |
98.3 |
99.1 |
rear |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
total |
99.4 |
100.2 |
98.7 |
99.3 |
99.3 |
98.3 |
99.7 |
| 2.6 Sample
storage
Fifteen
Chromosorb 106 tubes were each spiked with 53 µg (1.1
mg/m3) of tetrahydrofurufryl acrylate and were
allowed to equilibrate for 6 h, then 48-L of air, with an
absolute humidity of 15.7 milligrams of water per liter of
air (about 80% relative humidity at 22.2 °C), was drawn
through them at 0.2 L/min. Three samples were analyzed
immediately. The remaining samples were sealed and six were
stored at room temperature (23 °C), while the other six were
stored at refrigerated temperature (4 °C). On day 7 three
samples from each group were analyzed, and the remaining
three from each group was analyzed on day 14. The amounts
recovered, indicate good storage stability for the time
period studied, with an average recovery on day 14 of 97.5%
for ambient storage and 98.1% for refrigerated storage.
Table 2.6 Storage Test for
Tetrahydrofurfuryl Acrylate
|
time (days) |
ambient storage recovery (%) |
refrigerated storage recovery (%) |
|
0 |
99.1 |
98.3 |
98.5 |
|
|
|
7 |
97.9 |
98.4 |
98.7 |
98.9 |
98.2 |
97.7 |
14 |
97.2 |
98.1 |
97.1 |
98.0 |
98.4 |
97.9 |
| 2.7
Recommended air volume and sampling rate
Based on
the data collected in this evaluation, 48-L air samples
should be collected at a sampling rate of 0.2 L/min for 240
minutes.
2.8 Interferences (sampling)
There
are no known compounds which will severely interfere with
the collection of tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate.
Suspected interferences should be reported to the
laboratory with submitted samples. 3. Analytical procedure
Adhere to the
rules set down in your Chemical Hygiene Plan. Avoid skin
contact and inhalation of all chemicals and review all
appropriate MSDSs.
3.1 Apparatus
3.1.1 A gas chromatograph equipped with a FID
detector. An Agilent 6890 Gas Chromatograph equipped with
a FID and a 7683 Injector was used in this evaluation.
3.1.2 A GC column capable of separating
tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate from the extraction solvent,
internal standard, and any potential interferences. A 60-m
× 0.32-mm i.d. DB-1 (1.0- µm df) capillary column was used
in this evaluation.
3.1.3 An electronic integrator
or some other suitable means of measuring peak areas. A
Waters Millennium32 Data System was used in
this evaluation.
3.1.4 Glass vials with
poly(tetrafluoroethylene)-lined caps. For this evaluation
2-mL vials were used.
3.1.5 A dispenser capable of
delivering 1.0 mL of extracting solvent to prepare
standards and samples. If a dispenser is not available, a
1.0-mL volumetric pipet may be used.
3.1.6
Volumetric flasks – 10-mL and other convenient sizes for
preparing standards.
3.1.7 Calibrated 10-µL or
20-µL syringe for preparing standards.
3.1.8 A
mechanical shaker. An Eberbach mechanical shaker was used
in this evaluation. 3.2 Reagents
3.2.1 Tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate, Reagent
grade. Aldrich 99% (lot 04106CO) was used in this
evaluation.
3.2.2 Carbon disulfide, Reagent grade.
Omni-Solv® 99.99% (lot 43279343) was used in this
evaluation.
3.2.3
p-Cymene, Reagent grade. Aldrich 99% (lot 11703TR)
was used in this evaluation.
3.2.4 N,N-Dimethylformamide, anhydrous
Reagent grade.
Aldrich 99.8% (lot 04643LA) was used in this
evaluation.
3.2.5 The extraction solvent was 99:1
carbon disulfide: DMF with 0.25 µL/mL p-cymene internal standard.
3.3 Standard preparation
3.3.1 Prepare working analytical standards by
injecting microliter amounts of terahydrofurfuryl acrylate
into volumetric flasks containing the extraction solvent.
An analytical standard at a concentration of 106 µg/mL is
equivalent to 2.2 mg/m3 based on a 48-liter air
volume.
3.3.2 Bracket sample concentrations with
working standard concentrations. If sample concentrations
are higher than the concentration range of prepared
standards, either analyze higher standards, or dilute the
sample. The higher standards should be at least as high in
concentration as the highest sample. Diluted samples
should be prepared with extracting solvent to obtain a
concentration within the existing standard range.
Dilutions of stock standards are prepared using the
extraction solvent for the concentration range of 1 to 213
µg/mL. 3.4 Sample preparation
3.4.1 Remove the plastic end caps from the
sample tubes and carefully transfer the adsorbent sections
to separate 2-mL vials. Discard the glass tube, urethane
foam plug and glass wool plug.
3.4.2 Add 1.0 mL of
desorbing solvent to each vial using the same dispenser as
used for preparation of standards.
3.4.3
Immediately seal the vials with
poly(tetrafluoroethylene)-lined caps.
3.4.4 Shake
the vials on a shaker for 30 minutes 3.5
Analysis
3.5.1 Gas chromatographic conditions
GC
conditions
|
zone temperature: |
|
column: |
initial 50 °C, hold 1
min, ramp at 10°/min to 170 °C, hold 7 min |
injector: |
250 °C |
detector: |
250 °C |
run time: |
20 min |
column gas flow: |
3.2 mL/min
(hydrogen) |
septum purge: |
1.9 mL/min
(hydrogen) |
injection size: |
1.0 µL (10:1
split) |
column: |
60-m × 0.32-mm i.d.
capillary DB-1 (df = 1.0 µm) |
retention times: |
4.0 min carbon
disulfide |
|
7.0 min DMF |
|
11.8 min p-cymene |
|
13.7 min
tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate |
FID
conditions
|
hydrogen flow: |
30 mL/min |
air flow: |
400 mL/min |
makeup flow: |
25 mL/min
(nitrogen) |
Figure 3.5.1
A chromatogram of
53.0 µg/mL tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate in 99:1
carbon disulfide:DMF with 0.25 µL/mL p-cymene internal standard.
(Key: (1) carbon disulfide; (2) benzene contaminant
in carbon disulfide; (3) DMF; (4)
p-cymene; and (5) tetrahydrofurfuryl
acrylate) | 3.5.2 Peak areas are measured by an
integrator or other suitable means.
3.5.3 An
internal standard (ISTD) calibration method is used. A
calibration curve can be constructed by plotting
ISTD-corrected response versus micrograms of analyte per
sample. Bracket the samples with freshly prepared
analytical standards over the range of concentrations.
Figure 3.5.3
Calibration curve
of tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate. (y = 499x +
506) | 3.6 Interferences (analytical)
3.6.1Any compound that produces a GC response
and has a similar retention time as the analyte is a
potential interference. If any potential interferences
were reported, they should be considered before samples
are extracted. Generally, chromatographic conditions can
be altered to separate an interference from the analyte.
3.6.2When necessary, the identity or purity of an
analyte peak may be confirmed by mass spectrometry or by
another analytical procedure. The mass spectrum in Figure
3.6 was from the analytical standard analyzed on an
Agilent 6890 with a 5973 Mass Selective Detector.
Figure 3.6
Mass spectrum of
tetrahydrofurfuryl
acrylate. | 3.7 Calculations
The amount of analyte
per sampler is obtained from the appropriate calibration
curve in terms of micrograms per sample, uncorrected for
extraction efficiency. This total amount is then corrected
by subtracting the total amount (if any) found on the blank.
The air concentration is calculated using the following
formula.
where: |
CM is concentration by
weight (mg/m3) |
M is micrograms per sample |
V is liters of air sampled |
EE is extraction
efficiency, in decimal
form |
4. Recommendations for further
study
Collection, reproducibility, and other detection
limit studies need to be performed to make this a fully
validated method.
References
1. Material Safety Data
Sheet: tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate, Chemwatch Victoria
Australia, accessed 12/23/03.
2. Howe-Grant, M.,
Kroschwitz, J., Ed, Encyclopedia of
Chemical Technology, John Wiley & Sons, New York,
1998, Supplement, p 174.
3. Howard, P., Neal, M., Ed.,
Dictionary of Chemical Names and
Synonyms, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton FL, 1992, p
I-705.
4. OSHA Chemical Sampling Information,
www.osha.gov (accessed 12/17/03).
5. Burright, D.;
Chan, Y.; Eide, M.; Elskamp, C.; Hendricks, W.; Rose, M. C.
Evaluation Guidelines for Air Sampling
Methods Utilizing Chromatographic Analysis; OSHA Salt
Lake Technical Center, U.S. Department of Labor: Salt Lake
City, UT, 1999.
|
|
| |