1. General Discussion
1.1 Background
1.1.1 History of procedure
The
OSHA Technical Center has received many requests for a sampling and
analytical procedure for o-sec-butylphenol (OSBP). OSHA promulgated an
exposure standard for o-sec-butylphenol in January, 1989, at a level
of 5 ppm. OSHA method 32 recommends collection of phenol and cresol on
XAD-7 tubes and desorption with methanol (Ref. 5.1). OSBP is
related to these compounds, so this means of collection and analysis
was tried and found to be successful. The desorption, retention and
storage studies all had recoveries above 94.9%.
1.1.2 Potential
workplace exposure (Ref. 5.2)
OSBP is used as a chemical
intermediate, and in the manufacture of resins, plasticizers, and
surface active agents.
1.1.3 Toxic Effects (This section is for
information purposes and should not be taken as the basis for OSHA
policy.) (Ref. 5.3)
OSBP is a skin and eye irritant. In
reported occupational exposures, OSBP was a mild respiratory irritant.
Skin exposures resulted in burns.
1.1.4 Physical properties
(Re. 5.2):
Compound: |
|
Synonyms: |
2-sec-butylphenol |
Molecular weight: |
150.24 |
Melting point: |
12ºC |
Boiling point: |
226ºC |
Flash point: |
107ºC (225ºF)(closed
cup) |
Odor: |
phenolic |
Color: |
colorless to light yellow
liquid |
Molecular formula: |
C10H140 |
CAS: |
89-72-5 |
IMIS: |
B705 |
RTECS: |
SJ8920000; 56581 |
DOT: |
UN2228 | 1.2 Limit defining parameters
1.2.1 The detection limit of the
analytical procedure is 1 µg o-sec-butylphenol. This is the smallest
amount that could be detected under normal operating
conditions.
1.2.2 The overall detection limit is 0.008 ppm.
(All ppm amounts in this study are based on a 20 liter air
volume.) 1.3 Advantages
1.3.1 The sampling procedure is
convenient.
1.3.2 The analytical method is reproducible and
sensitive.
1.3.3 Reanalysis of samples is
possible.
1.3.4 It may be possible to analyze other compounds
at the same time.
1.3.5 Interferences may be avoided by proper
selection of column and GC parameters. 1.4 Disadvantages
None known.
2. Sampling technique
2.1 Apparatus
2.1.1 A calibrated personal sampling
pump, the flow of which can be determined within ± 5% at the
recommended flow.
2.1.2 XAD-7 tubes containing 15/50 mesh XAD-7
with a 100 mg adsorbing section with a 50 mg backup section separated
by silanized glass wool plug, with a silanized glass wool plug before
and at the back of the backup section. The ends are flame sealed and
the glass tube containing the adsorbent is 8 cm long, with a 8 mm O.D.
and 6 mm I.D., SKC tubes or equivalent. 2.2 Sampling technique
2.2.1 Open the ends of the XAD-7 tubes
immediately before sampling.
2.2.2 Connect the XAD-7 tubes to
the sampling pump with flexible tubing.
2.2.3 Place the tubes
in a vertical position to minimize channeling, with the smaller
section towards the pump.
2.2.4 Air being sampled should not
pass through any hose or tubing before entering the XAD-7
tubes.
2.2.5 Seal the XAD-7 tubes with plastic caps immediately
after sampling. Seal each sample lengthwise with OSHA Form-21 sealing
tape.
2.2.6 With each batch of samples, submit at least one
blank tube from the same lot used for samples. This tube should be
subjected to exactly the same handling as the samples (break ends,
seal & transport) except that no air is drawn through
it.
2.2.7 Transport the samples (and corresponding paper work)
to the lab for analysis.
2.2.8 Bulks submitted for analysis
must be shipped in a separate container from other
samples. 2.3 Desorption
efficiency
Six tubes were spiked with loadings of 59.9 µg (0.487
ppm), 300 µg (2.44 ppm), and 599 µg (4.87 ppm) OSBP. They were allowed
to equilibrate overnight at room temperature. They were opened, each
section placed into a separate 2 mL vial, desorbed with 1 mL of methanol
with 1 µL/mL dimethyl formamide internal standard for 30 minutes with
occasional shaking, and analyzed by GC-FID. The overall average was
94.9%. (Table 1)
Table
1 Desorption Efficiency
|
Tube# |
59.9 µg |
% Recovered 300
µg |
599 µg |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6
average |
95.2 95.3 96.0 94.0 95.9 97.6
95.7 |
96.1 95.3 94.4 95.5 94.6 95.6
95.3 |
93.4 93.8 93.7 94.5 93.3 94.0
93.8 |
|
|
|
|
overall
average 94.9 standard deviation ± 1.13 |
|
2.4 Retention
efficiency
Six tubes were spiked with 599 µg (4.87 ppm) OSBP,
allowed to equilibrate overnight, and then had 20 liters humid air (89%
RH) pulled through them. They were opened desorbed and analyzed by
GC-FID. The retention efficiency averaged 99.7%. There was no OSBP found
on the backup portions of the tubes. The results were corrected for
desorption efficiency. (Table 2)
Table
2 Retention Efficiency
|
Tube # |
% Recovered "A" |
% Recovered "B" |
Total |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
101 100 99.3 101 97.7 99.2 |
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 |
101 100 99.3 101 97.7 99.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
99.7 |
|
2.5
Storage
Tubes were spiked with 599 µg (4.87 ppm) OSBP and stored
at room temperature until opened and analyzed. Since OSBP may decompose
in light, half of the tubes were stored under room light, and half were
stored in darkness. The samples were found to be stable under both
conditions. Results were corrected for desorption efficiency. The
recoveries averaged 98.5% for the 14 days stored. (Table
3)
Table
3 Storage Study
|
Day |
% Recovered light |
% Recovered dark |
|
7 7 7 14 14 14 |
100 96.6 lost 97.5 96.9 96.1 |
100 101 101 98.0 98.1 98.5 |
|
|
|
overall average
98.5 |
|
|
2.6
Precision
The precision was calculated using the area counts from
six injections of each standard at concentrations of 59.9, 300, 599, and
1198 µg/mL o-sec-butylphenol in the desorbing solution. The pooled
coefficient of variation was 0.00382 (Table 4)
Table 4 Precision
Study |
|
Injection Number |
59.9 µg/mL |
300 µg/mL |
599 µg/mL |
1198 µg/mL |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
18818 18754 18932 18933 18661 18844 |
94167 93814 93727 93357 93463 94214 |
188787 188507 188052 189711 189578 189002 |
382116 383068 383614 383533 383214 382807 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
18824 |
93790 |
188940 |
383059 |
|
|
|
|
|
Standard Deviation |
±105 |
352 |
633 |
549 |
CV |
0.00558 |
0.00375 |
0.00335 |
0.00143 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled CV |
0.00382 |
|
|
|
|
where:
|
standard
deviation |
CV (Coefficient of Variation) = |
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled CV = /\ |
|
|
|
|
|
/ |
A1(CV1) ^ 2 + A2 (CV2) ^
2 + A3(CV3) ^ 2 + A4(CV4) ^ 2 |
|
\ |
|
|
|
/ |
|
------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
\ |
|
/ |
|
|
A1 + A2 + A3 + A4 |
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A(1), A(2), A(3), A(4) =
# of injections at each level CV1, CV2, CV3, CV4 = Coefficients
at each level | 2.7 Air
volume and sampling rate studied
2.7.1 The air volume studied is 20
liters.
2.7.2 The sampling rate studied is 0.2 liters per
minute. 2.8
Interferences
Suspected interferences should be listed on sample
data sheets.
2.9 Safety precautions
2.9.1 sampling equipment should be
placed on an employee in a manner that does not interfere with work
performance or safety.
2.9.2 Safety glasses should be worn at
all times.
2.9.3 Follow all safety practices that apply to the
workplace being sampled. 3. Analytical method
3.1 Apparatus
3.1.1 Gas chromatograph equipped with
a flame ionization detector. A HP 5890 gas chromatograph was used in
this study.
3.1.2 GC column capable of separating the analyte
and an internal standard from any interferences. The column used in
this study was a 30 meter DB-225 capillary column, 0.25 µ d.f., and
0.32 mm I.D. An alternate column is a 60 meter DB-1 capillary column,
1.0 µ d.f., and 0.32 mm I.D.
3.1.3 An electronic integrator or
some other suitable method of measuring peak areas.
3.1.4 Two
milliliter vials with Teflon-lined caps.
3.1.5 A 10 µL syringe
or other convenient size for sample injection.
3.1.6 Pipets for
dispensing the desorbing solution. The Glenco 1 mL dispenser was used
in this method.
3.1.7 Volumetric flasks - 5 mL and other
convenient sizes for preparing standards. 3.2 Reagents
3.2.1 Purified GC grade nitrogen,
hydrogen, and air.
3.2.2 o-sec-Butylphenol, Reagent
grade
3.2.3 Methanol, HPLC grade
3.2.4 Dimethyl
formamide, Reagent grade
3.2.5 Desorbing solution is 1 µL/mL
dimethyl formamide internal standard in methanol.
3.3 Sample preparation
3.3.1 Sample tubes are opened and the
front and back section of each tube are placed in separate 2-mL vials,
and the front glass woll was placed in the vial containing the front
section.
3.3.2 Each section is desorbed with 1 mL of the
desorbing solution.
3.3.3 The vials are sealed immediately and
allowed to desorb for 30 minutes with occasional shaking.
3.4 Standard preparation
3.4.1 Standards are prepared by
diluting a known quantity of OSBP with the desorbing
solution.
3.4.2 At least two separate stock standards should be
made. Dilutions of the stock standards are prepared to bracket the
samples. For this study standards ranged from 1 to 1198 µg/mL.
3.5 Analysis
3.5.1 Gas chromatograph conditions
DB-225 capillary column.
Flow rates (mL/min) |
|
Temperature (°C) |
Nitrogen (makeup) |
:30 |
Injector |
: 240 |
Hydrogen (carrier) |
:1.5 |
Detector |
:240 |
Air |
:450 |
Column |
:110°-1 min |
Hydrogen (detector) |
:30 |
|
4°C/min-160°C |
Injection size |
:1 µL |
|
|
Elution time |
:7.827 min |
|
|
Chromatogram |
:(See Figure 1) |
|
3.5.2 Gas
chromatograph conditions DB-1 capillary column.
Flow rates (mL/min) |
Temperature (°C) |
Nitrogen (makeup) |
:30 |
Injector |
:220 |
Hydrogen (carrier) |
:1.5 |
Detector |
:240 |
Air |
:450 |
Column |
:80°-0 min |
Hydrogen (detector) |
:30 |
|
10°C/min-220°C |
Injection size |
1 µL |
|
|
Elution time |
14.58 min |
|
|
Chromatogram |
:(See Figure 2) |
|
|
3.5.3 Peak areas are
measured by an integrator or other suitable
means. 3.6 Interferences
(analytical)
3.6.1 Any compound having the general
retention time of the analyte or the internal standard used is an
interference. Possible interferences should be listed on the sample
data sheet. GC parameters should be adjusted if necessary so these
interferences will pose no problems
3.6.2 Retention time data
on a single column is not considered proof of chemical identity.
Samples over the target concentration should be confirmed by GC/Mass
Spec or other suitable means. 3.7 Calculations
3.7.1 A curve with area counts versus
concentration is calculated from the calibration
standards.
3.7.2 The area counts for the samples are plotted
with the calibration curve to obtain the concentration of OSBP in
solution.
3.7.3 To calculate the concentration of analyte in
the air sample the following formulas are used:
(µg/mL) (desorption volume) |
|
mass of analyte
in sample |
|
= |
(desorption efficiency) |
|
(mass of analyte in sample) |
|
number of moles
of analyte |
|
= |
molecular weight |
|
(number of moles) of analyte |
(molar volume) at 25ºC &
760mm |
= |
volume the analyte will occupy at
25ºC |
(volume analyte occupies)
(106) * |
|
|
|
= |
ppm |
(air volume) |
|
| *
All units must cancel.
3.7.4 The above equations can be
consolidated to form the following formula. To calculate the ppm of
analyte in the sample based on a 20 liter air
sample:
(µg/mL) (DV) (24.45)
(106) |
|
(g) |
|
(mg) |
= |
ppm |
|
X |
|
X |
|
(20 L)(DE)(MW) |
|
(1000mg) |
|
(1000µg) |
µg/mL |
= |
concentration of analyte in sample or
standard |
24.45 |
= |
Molar volume (liters/mole) at 25°C and 760 mm
Hg. |
MW |
= |
Molecular weight |
DV |
= |
Molecular weight (g/mole) |
20 L |
= |
20 liter air sample |
DE |
= |
Desorption
efficiency |
3.7.5
This calculation is done for each section of the sampling tube and the
results added together. 3.8
Safety precautions
3.8.1 All handling of solvents should
be done in a hood.
3.8.2 Avoid skin contact with all
chemicals
3.8.3 Wear safety glasses, gloves and a lab coat at
all times. 4.
Recommendations for further study
Collection study should be
performed.
|
Figure 1. An analytical
standard of 300 µg/mL o-sec-butylphenol in methanol with 1 µL/mL
dimethyl formamide internal standard analyzed on a 30 meter DB-225
capillary column. |
|
Figure 2. An analytical standard of
300 µg/mL o-sec-butylphenol in methanol with 1 µL/mL dimethyl
formamide internal standard analyzed on a 60 miter DB-1 capillary
column. | 5.
References
5.1 Cummins, K., Method 32, "Phenol and
Cresol," Organic Methods Evaluation Branch, OSHA Salt Lake Technical
Center, 1986.
5.2 Sax, N., Lewis, R., "Hawley's Condensed
Chemical Dictionary," Eleventh Edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New
York, 1987, p. 190.
5.2 "Documentation of the Threshold Limit
Values and Biological Exposure Indices," Fifth Edition, American
Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Inc., Cincinnati, OH,
1986 p. 84. |