1. General Discussion
1.1 Background
1.1.1 History
ACGIH TLV for
benzyl acetate is 10 ppm (61 mg/m³). This work was performed because
no method was available. Analysis by gas chromatography with a flame
ionization detector was chosen. Charcoal tubes did not give good
recovery when 10 L humid air was drawn thru the tubes, TBC charcoal
tubes were selected for better recovery. Carbon disulfide was selected
for the extraction solvent and was found to give an extraction
efficiency of 97.3%. The retention efficiency when 10 L humid air
drawn was 94.3% and the storage stability was 98.6% recovery on Day
14.
1.1.2 Toxic effects (This section is for information only
and should not be taken as the basis of OSHA policy.)1
If ingested benzyl acetate can cause gastrointestinal (G.I.)
irritation with vomiting and diarrhea. It also is irritating to skin,
eyes and respiratory tract.
1.1.3 Workplace exposure2
Benzyl
acetate is used in artificial jasmine and other perfumes, soap
perfume, flavoring, natural and synthetic resins, oils, lacquers,
polishes, printing inks and varnish removers.
1.1.4 Physical
properties and other descriptive information3,4
CAS number: |
140-11-4 |
IMIS4: |
B508 |
RTECS number: |
AF 5075000:1738 |
molecular weight: |
150.17 |
melting point: |
-51°C |
boiling point: |
213°C |
appearance: |
clear liquid |
molecular formula: |
C9H10O2 |
odor: |
pear like |
flash point: |
102°C (216°F)(cc) |
autoignition temperature: |
|
density: |
1.05 |
460°C |
|
|
synonyms: |
Acetic acid phenylmethyl ester;
acetic acid benzyl ester |
solubility: |
ether, alcohol |
|
|
structural formula: |
|
|
|
This method was evaluated according to the OSHA SLTC
“Evaluation Guidelines for Air Sampling Methods Utilizing Chromatographic
Analysis”5.
The Guidelines define analytical parameters, specify required laboratory
tests, statistical calculations and acceptance criteria. The analyte air
concentrations throughout this method are based on the recommended
sampling and analytical parameters.
1.2 Detection Limit of the Overall
procedure (DLOP) and Reliable Quantitation Limit (RQL).
The DLOP
is measured as mass per sample and expressed as equivalent air
concentrations, based on the recommended sampling parameters. Ten
samplers were spiked with equal descending increments of analyte, such
that the highest sampler loading was 3.2 µg benzyl acetate. This is the
amount spiked on a sampler that would produce a peak approximately 10
times the response for a sample blank. These spiked samplers were
analyzed with the recommended analytical parameters, and the data
obtained used to calculate the required parameters (standard error of
estimate and slope) for the calculation of the DLOP. The slope was 1997
and the SEE was 104.2. The RQL is considered the lower limit for precise
quantitative measurements.
It is determined from the regression
line parameters obtained for the calculation of the DLOP, providing 75%
to 125% of the analyte is recovered. The DLOP and RQL were 0.157µg and
0.521 µg, respectively.
Table
1.2 Detection Limit of the Overall Procedure for
benzyl Acetate
|
mass per
sample (µg) |
area
counts (µV-s) |
|
0.00 0.32 0.64 0.96 1.28 1.60 1.92 2.24 2.56 2.88 3.20 |
0 809 1366 2189 2816 3429 3969 4523 5142 5836 6522 |
| |
Figure 1.2.1
Plot of data to determine the DLOP/RQL for benzyl acetate. (Y =
1997X + 95.8) |
Below is chromatogram of
the RQL level. |
|
Figure
1.2.2. Chromatogram of the RQL of benzyl acetate. (1, 5, and 6 =
impurity; 2 (doublet)= carbon disulfide; 3= benzene (contaminant
in the carbon disulfide); 4 = p-cymene; and 7 = benzyl acetate) |
|
2. Sampling Procedure
All safety
practices that apply to the work area being sampled should be followed.
The sampling equipment should be attached to the worker in such a manner
that it will not interfere with work performance or safety.
2.1 Apparatus
2.1.1 Samples are collected using a
personal sampling pump calibrated, with the sampling device attached,
to within ±5% of the recommended flow rate.
2.1.2 Samples are
collected with 7-cm × 4-mm i.d. × 7-mm o.d. glass sampling tubes
packed with two sections (100/50 mg) of TBC Coated charcoal. The
sections are held in place and separated with glass wool plugs. For
this evaluation, commercially prepared sampling tubes were purchased
from SKC, Inc. (catalog no. 226-73). 2.2 Reagents
None required.
2.3
Technique
2.3.1 Immediately before sampling,
break off the ends of the flame-sealed tube to provide an opening
approximately half the internal diameter of the tube. Wear eye
protection when breaking ends. Use tube holders to minimize the hazard
of broken glass. All tubes should be from the same lot.
2.3.2
The smaller section of the adsorbent tube is used as a back-up and is
positioned nearest the sampling pump. Attach the tube holder to the
sampling pump so that the adsorbent tube is in an approximately
vertical position with the inlet facing down during sampling. Position
the sampling pump, tube holder and tubing so they do not impede work
performance or safety.
2.3.3 Draw the air to be sampled
directly into the inlet of the tube holder. The air being sampled is
not to be passed through any hose or tubing before entering the
sampling tube.
2.3.4 After sampling for the appropriate time,
remove the adsorbent tube and seal it with plastic end caps. Seal each
sample end-to-end with an OSHA-21 form as soon as
possible.
2.3.5 Submit at least one blank sample with each set
of samples. Handle the blank sampler in the same manner as the other
samples except draw no air through it.
2.3.6 Record sample air
volumes (liters), sampling time (minutes) and sampling rate (mL/min)
for each sample, along with any potential interferences on the
OSHA-91A form.
2.3.7 Submit the samples to the laboratory for
analysis as soon as possible after sampling. If delay is unavoidable,
store the samples at refrigerator temperature. Ship any bulk samples
separate from the air samples. 2.4 Extraction efficiency
The extraction efficiency
was determined by liquid-spiking TBC Coated charcoal tube with benzyl
acetate at 0.1 to 2 times the target concentration. These samples were
stored overnight at ambient temperature and then extracted for 30
minutes with occasional shaking, and analyzed. The mean extraction
efficiency over the studied range was 97.3%. The wet extraction
efficiency was determined at 1 times the target concentration by liquid
spiking the analyte onto TBC Coated charcoal tubes which had 10 L humid
air (absolute humidity of 15.9 mg/L of water, about 80% relative
humidity at 22.2°C) drawn through them. The mean recovery for the wet
samples was 94.6%.
Table 2.4 Extraction
Efficiency (%) of Benzyl Acetate
|
level |
|
sample number |
|
|
× target concn |
mg per sample |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
mean |
|
0.1 0.25 0.5 1.0 2.0
1.0(wet) |
0.06 0.15 0.31 0.61 1.22
0.61 |
97.9 99.1 97.3 97.2 95.8
97.3 |
99.1 98.6 92.7 95.8 95.6
93.9 |
97.9 99.2 98.7 96.5 93.2
93.2 |
99,2 100.2 98.4 100.2 94.8
94.4 |
96.3 99.1 97.3 97.4 96.2
94.2 |
98.1 99.1 96.9 97.4 95.1
94.6 |
| 2.5 Retention
efficiency
Six TBC Coated charcoal tubes were spiked with 1.22 mg
(20 ppm) of benzyl acetate and allowed to equilibrate for 6 h. The tubes
had 10 L humid air (absolute humidity of 15.9 mg/L of water, about 80%
relative humidity at 22.2°C) pulled through them at 0.1 L/min. The
samples were extracted and analyzed. The mean retention recovery was
94.3%. There was no analyte found on the backup section of any of the
tubes.
Table
2.5 Retention Effeciency (%) of Benzyl Acetate
|
|
|
|
sample
number |
|
|
|
section |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
mean |
|
front rear total |
94.3 0.0 94.3 |
94.1 0.0 94.1 |
96.8 0.0 96.8 |
93.7 0.0 93.7 |
93.8 0.0 93.8 |
93.1 0.0 93.1 |
94.3 0.0 94.3 |
| 2.6 Sample
storage
Nine TBC Coated charcoal tubes were each spiked with 0.61
mg (10.0 ppm) of benzyl acetate. They were allowed to equilibrate for 6
h, then 10 L of air, with an absolute humidity of 15.7 milligrams of
water per liter of air (about 80% relative humidity at 22.2°C), was
drawn through them. Three samples were analyzed immediately, and the
rest were sealed and stored at room temperature. Three more were
analyzed after 7 days of storage and the remaining three after 14 days
of storage. The amounts recovered, which are corrected for retention
efficiency, indicate good storage stability for the time period
studied.
Table 2.6 Storage Test
for Benzyl Acetate (% Recovery)
|
|
sample number |
|
time(days) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
mean |
|
0 7 14 |
99.4 99.5 98.3 |
96.9 98.8 98.7 |
96.2 99.7 98.8 |
97.5 99.3 98.6 |
| 2.7 Recommended air
volume and sampling rate.
Based on the data collected in this
evaluation, 10-L air samples should be collected at a sampling rate of
0.1 L/min for 100 minutes.
2.8 Interferences (sampling)
2.8.1 There are no known compounds
that will severely interfere with the collection of benzyl
acetate.
2.8.2 Suspected interferences should be reported to
the laboratory with submitted samples.
3. Analytical
Procedure
Adhere to the rules set down in your Chemical Hygiene
Plan. Avoid skin contact and inhalation of all chemicals and review all
appropriate MSDSs.
3.1 Apparatus
3.1.1 A gas chromatograph equipped
with an FID. For this evaluation, a Hewlett-Packard 6890 Series Gas
Chromatograph equipped with a 6890 Automatic Sampler was
used.
3.1.2 A GC column capable of separating benzyl acetate
from the desorption solvent, internal standard and any potential
interferences. A 60-m × 0.32-mm i.d. capillary STABILWAX with a 0.5 µm
df (Restek Corporation) was used in the evaluation.
3.1.3 An
electronic integrator or some other suitable means of measuring peak
areas. A Waters Millennium32 Data System was used in this
evaluation.
3.1.4 Glass vials with
poly(tetrafluoroethylene)-lined caps. For this evaluation 2-mL vials
were used.
3.1.5 A dispenser capable of delivering 1.0 mL of
desorbing solvent to prepare standards and samples. If a dispenser is
not available, a 1.0-mL volumetric pipet may be used.
3.1.7
Volumetric flasks - 10-mL and other convenient sizes for preparing
standards.
3.1.8 Calibrated 10-µL syringe for preparing
standards. 3.2 Reagents
3.2.1 Benzyl acetate, reagent grade.
Aldrich 99% (lot 08515DS) was used in this evaluation.
3.2.2
Carbon disulfide, reagent grade. Omni-Solv 99.99% (lot 34279) was used
for this evaluation.
3.2.3 p-Cymene, reagent grade. Aldrich 99%
(lot 11703TR) was used in this evaluation.
3.2.4 The extraction
solvent was 0.25 µL/mL p-cymene in carbon disulfide.
3.2.5 GC
grade nitrogen, air, and hydrogen. 3.3 Standard preparation
3.3.1 Prepare working analytical
standards by injecting micro liter amounts of benzyl acetate into
volumetric flasks containing the extraction solvent. An analytical
standard at a concentration of 1.22 mg/mL (1.16 µL/mL) is equivalent
to 20.0 ppm based on a 10-liter air volume.
3.3.2 Bracket
sample concentrations with working standard concentrations. If sample
concentrations are higher than the concentration range of prepared
standards, prepare and analyze additional standards, at least as high
a concentration as the highest sample, to ascertain the linearity of
response, or dilute the sample with extracting solvent to obtain a
concentration within the existing standard range. The range of
standards used in this study was from 0.00032 to 1.22 mg/mL.
3.4 Sample preparation
3.4.1 Remove the plastic end caps from
the sample tubes and carefully transfer the adsorbent sections to
separate 2-mL vials. Discard the glass tube and glass wool
plug.
3.4.2 Add 1.0 mL of extraction solvent to each vial using
the same dispenser as used for preparation of standards.
3.4.3
Immediately seal the vials with poly(tetrafluoroethylene)-lined
caps.
3.4.4 Shake the vials vigorously by hand several times
during the next 30 minutes. 3.5
Analysis
3.5.1 Analytical
conditions
GC conditions
|
|
Figure
3.5.1 A chromatogram of 610 µg/mL benzyl acetate in carbon
disulfide with 0.25 µL/mL p-cymene internal standard. Key: (1)
and (2) carbon disulfide; (3) benzene contaminant in the carbon
disulfide; (4) p-cymene; (5) benzyl acetate. |
Injector: |
250°C |
Detector: |
250°C |
run time: |
14 min |
column gas flow: |
2.5
mL/min (hydrogen) |
septum purge: |
1.9
mL/min (hydrogen) |
injection size: |
1.0 µL (15:1 split) |
column: |
60-m × 0.32-mm i.d.
capillary STABILWAX (0.5-µm df) |
retention times: |
2.53 min (carbon disulfide);
2.81 min (benzene contaminate in the carbon disulfide); 4.68
min (p-cymene); 8.41 min (benzyl acetate) |
FID conditions
|
|
|
hydrogen flow: |
38 mL/min |
|
air flow: |
450 mL/min |
|
makeup flow: |
50 mL/min (nitrogen) |
| 3.5.2 Peak areas are measured by an integrator or other
suitable means.
3.5.3 An internal standard (ISTD) calibration
method is used. A calibration curve can be constructed by plotting
ISTD-corrected response of standard injections versus milligrams of
analyte per sample. Bracket the samples with freshly prepared
analytical standards over a range of concentrations.
Figure
3.5.3 Calibration curve of Benzyl Acetate. (Y = 694x -
336) | 3.6
Interferences (analytical)
3.6.1 Any compound that produces a GC
response and has a similar retention time as the analyte is a
potential interference. If any potential interferences were reported,
they should be considered before samples are extracted.
Generally, chromatographic conditions can be altered to separate an
interference from the analyte.
Figure
3.6.1 The mass spectrum of benzyl
acetate. | 3.6.2 When
necessary, the identity or purity of an analyte peak may be confirmed
by mass spectrometry or by another analytical procedure. The mass
spectrum in Figure 3.6.2 was from the NIST spectral library.
3.7 Calculations
The amount of
analyte per sampler is obtained from the appropriate calibration curve
in terms of micrograms per sample, uncorrected for extraction
efficiency. This total amount is then corrected by subtracting the total
amount (if any) found on the blank. The air concentration is calculated
using the following formulas.
|
where: |
CM is concentration by weight
(mg/m³) M is micrograms per sample V is liters of air
sampled EE is extraction efficiency, in decimal
form |
|
where: |
CV is concentration by volume
(ppm) VM is molar volume at 25°C and 1 atm =
24.46 CM is concentration by weight Mr
is molecular weight = 150.17 | 4. Recommendations for Further Study
Several other
tests need to be performed to make this a validated
method.
1. The Merck Index , 11th edition Merck & Co..Inc
.Rawhay, N.J. 1989, p 176.
2. The Condensed Chemical Dictionary,
thirteenth Ed. Gessner G. Hawley. Von Nostrand Reinhold : New York, 1997,
p 129.
3. The Condensed Chemical Dictionary, thirteenth Ed. Gessner
G. Hawley. Von Nostrand Reinhold: New York, 1997, p 129.
4. OSHA
Chemical Sampling Guide, http://www.osha-slc.gov/ (01/05/2003
accessed)
5. Burright, D.; Chan, Y.; Eide, M.; Elskamp, C.;
Hendricks, W.; Rose, M. C. Evaluation Guidelines for Air Sampling Methods
Utilizing Chromatographic Analysis; OSHA Salt Lake Technical Center, U.S.
Department of Labor: Salt Lake City, UT, 1999.
|