1. General Discussion
1.1 Background
1.1.1 History of procedure
This
evaluation was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of the OVS-2
tube as a sampling device for piperonyl butoxide. It follows the
sampling procedure developed for pyrethrum (Ref.
5.1).
1.1.2.Toxic effects (This section is for information only
and should not be taken as the basis of OSHA policy)
Piperonyl
butoxide is an "insecticide synergist". It appears in the "Toxic
Substance Control Act's" initial inventory.
Some of the oldest
naturally occurring insecticides are the pyrethrins. These botanical
insecticides and their synthetic analogs the pyrethroids, decomposes
in the environment. In order to increase their
effective lifetime, synergist like piperonyl butoxide is
added.
Piperonyl butoxide is commonly used in spray formulation
as a synergist. Even though it is relatively nontoxic, it's extensive
use has generated interest among industrial hygienist and regulatory
officials. It has an Oral LD50 >7500 mg/kg for rat
(Ref.5.3).
Due to these factors an arbitrary target
concentration of 10 mg/m³, was chosen for piperonyl
butoxide.
1.1.3 Potential workplace exposure
No data is
available on the extent of work place exposure (Ref.
5.3). 1.1.4 Physical properties (Ref. 5.2, 5.3)
CAS number: |
51-03-6 |
IMISnumber: |
P209 |
Molecular weight: |
338.43 |
Molecular formula: |
C19H30O5 |
Solubility: |
Soluble in methanol, ethanol,
benzene, freons, and oils |
Synonyms: |
piperonyl butoxide, butacide |
Chemical name: |
butyl carbitol 6-propylpiperonyl
ether |
Appearance: |
light brown liquid |
Structure:
| 1.2 Limit defining parameters
The detection limit
of the analytical procedure is 0.08 ng per injection. This is the amount
of analyte which will give a peak whose height is approximately five
times the baseline noise. 2.
Sampling Procedure
2.1 Apparatus
2.1.1 A sample is collected by using a
personal sampling pump that can be calibrated to within ± 5% of the
recommended flow rate with the sampling device in line.
2.1.2
OVS-2 tubes, which are specially made 13-mm o.d. glass tubes that are
tapered to 6-mm o.d. They are packed with a 140-mg backup section and
a 270-mg sampling section of XAD-2 adsorbent. The backup section is
retained by two foam plugs and the sampling section is between one
foam plug and a 13-mm diameter glass fiber filter. The glass fiber
filter is held next to the sampling section by a
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) retainer. These tubes are commercially
available from SKC and Supelco.
2.2 Reagents
No sampling reagents are required.
2.3 Sampling technique
2.3.1 Attach the small end of the
OVS-2 sampling tube to the sampling pump with flexible plastic tubing
such that the large front section of the sampling tube is exposed
directly to the atmosphere. Do not place any tubing in front of the
sampler.
2.3.2 Attach the sampler vertically (large end down)
in the employee's breathing zone in such a manner that it does not
impede work performance.
2.3.3 After sampling for the
appropriate time, remove the sampling device and seal the tube with
plastic end caps.
2.3.4 Wrap each sample end-to-end with an
OSHA seal (Form 21).
2.3.5 Record the air volume for each
sample and list any possible interferences.
2.3.6 Submit at
least one blank with each set of samples. Handle the blank in the same
manner as the other samples, except no air is drawn through
it.
2.3.7 Submit any bulk samples for analysis in a separate
container. Do not ship bulk samples with the air samples.
2.4 Desorption efficiency
A
13-mm glass fiber filter and an amount of XAD-2 adsorbent equal to the
sampling section (270 mg) of an OVS-2 tube were placed in each of twelve
4-mL vials. They were divided into three groups of four vials. These
groups were liquid spiked respectively with 10, 5 and 1 L of a 29.7
mg/mL solution of piperonyl butoxide in methanol by spiking the glass
fiber filter. These amounts represent 1.0x, 0.5x, and 0.lx the target
concentration. They were then sealed with PTFE-lined septa and allowed
to equilibrate overnight in a drawer at room temperature. The vials,
along with a blank vial, were desorbed with 3.0 mL of methanol, and
analyzed as in Section 3. The average desorption efficiency was 94%. The
results are listed in Table 2.4.
Table 2.4 Desorption Efficiency
|
Sample # |
Amount Spiked, µg |
Amount Found, µg |
% Recovered |
|
D1 |
297.0 |
281.5 |
94.8 |
D2 |
297.0 |
290.7 |
97.9 |
D3 |
297.0 |
281.2 |
94.7 |
D4 |
297.0 |
288.5 |
97.1 |
Average of 1x TC =
96.1% |
|
|
|
|
D5 |
148.5 |
142.9 |
96.2 |
D6 |
148.5 |
137.0 |
92.3 |
D7 |
148.5 |
141.1 |
95.0 |
D8 |
148.5 |
138.5 |
93.3 |
Average of 0.5x TC =
94.2% |
|
|
|
|
D9 |
29.7 |
26.9 |
90.7 |
D10 |
29.7 |
26.6 |
89.4 |
D11 |
29.7 |
29.0 |
97.7 |
D12 |
29.7 |
26.0 |
87.5 |
Average of 0.5x TC =
91.3% |
| 2.5 Retention
efficiency
Four OVS-2 tubes were each liquid spiked with 10 L (1x
TC of a 29.7 mg/mL solution of piperonyl butoxide in methanol by spiking
the glass fiber filter. These were allowed to equilibrate overnight in a
drawer at room temperature and then 30 L of humid air (~80% relative
humidity) were drawn through each tube at 1.0 L/min. The tubes, along
with a blank tube, were desorbed with 3.0 mL of methanol, and analyzed
as in Section 3. No analyte was observed in the backup sections. The
results are listed in Table 2.5.
Table 2.5 Retention Efficiency
|
Sample # |
Amount Spiked, µg |
Amount Found, µg |
% Recovered |
|
R1 |
297.0 |
270.5 |
91.1 |
R2 |
297.0 |
274.3 |
92.4 |
R3 |
297.0 |
265.0 |
89.2 |
R4 |
297.0 |
282.2 |
95.0 |
Average = 91.9% |
| 2.6 Sample
storage
Eight OVS-2 tubes were each liquid spiked with 10 µL (1x
TC of a 29.7 mg/mL solution of piperonyl butoxide in methanol by spiking
the glass fiber filter. These tubes were allowed to equilibrate
overnight in a drawer at room temperature and then 30 L of humid air
(-80% relative humidity) were drawn through each tube at 1.0 L/min. The
eight tubes were divided into two groups of four tubes each. The first
group was stored in a drawer at ambient temperature, the second group
was stored in a freezer (-50°C). After fifteen days they were extracted
and analyzed as in section 3. No analyte was observed in the backup
sections. The results are given in Tables 2.6.1, and
2.6.2.
Table 2.6.1 Ambient Storage
|
Days Stored |
Amount Spiked, µg |
Amount Found, µg |
% Recovered |
|
15 |
297.0 |
257.3 |
86.6 |
15 |
297.0 |
249.8 |
84.1 |
15 |
297.0 |
262.5 |
88.4 |
15 |
297.0 |
236.7 |
79.7 |
Average = 84.7% |
|
Table 2.6.2 Freezer Storage
|
Days Stored |
Amount Spiked, µg |
Amount Found, µg |
% Recovered |
|
15 |
297.0 |
280.0 |
94.3 |
15 |
297.0 |
258.6 |
87.1 |
15 |
297.0 |
270.1 |
90.9 |
15 |
297.0 |
269.0 |
90.6 |
Average = 90.7% |
| 2.7.Recommended air
volume and sampling rate
2.7.1 The recommended air volume is 30
L.
2.7.2.The recommended flow rate is 1.0 L/min.
2.8 Interferences (sampling)
It
is not known if any compound will interfere with the collection of
piperonyl butoxide. Any suspected interferences should be reported to
the laboratory with submitted samples.
2.9 Safety precautions
(sampling)
2.9.1 Attach the sampling equipment in
such a manner that it .will not interfere with work performance or
employee safety.
2.9.2 Follow all safety practices that apply
to the work area being sampled. 3. Analytical Procedure
3.1 Apparatus
3.1.1 A high performance liquid
chromatograph equipped with a ABI 785 variable wavelength UV
detector and Waters 717 autosampler was used in this
evaluation.
3.1.2 An HPLC column capable of separating
piperonyl butoxide from any interferences. A 25-cm x 4.6-mm i.d.
(5-µm) Supelco LC-DB-18 column was used in this
evaluation.
3.1.3 An electronic integrator or some other
suitable means to measure detector response. A Waters 860 Networking
Computer System was used in this evaluation.
3.1.4 Volumetric
flasks, pipets, and syringes for preparing standards, making dilutions
and performing injections.
3.1.5. Vials, 4-mL, with PTFE-lined
caps.
3.1.6 Mechanical shaker. 3.2 Reagents
3.2.1 Piperonyl butoxide. A 99% pure
standard from EPA was used in this evaluation.
3.2.2 Methanol.
The methanol used in this evaluation was pur- chased from Burdick and
Jackson.
3.2.3 Acetonitrile. The ACN used in this evaluation
was purchased from Burdick and Jackson.
3.2.4 Water. HPLC grade
water was obtained from Millipore Milli-O water purification
system. 3.3 Standard
preparation
Prepare stock standards by adding methanol to
preweighed amounts of piperonyl butoxide. Prepare working range
standards by diluting stock solutions with methanol. Store stock and
dilute standards in a freezer.
3.4 Sample preparation
3.4.1 Transfer the 13-mm glass fiber
filter and the 270-mg sampling section of the tube to a 4-mL vial.
Place the first foam plug and the 140-mg backup section in a separate
vial. A small glass funnel can be used to facilitate the transfer of
the adsorbent. Discard the rear foam plug. Do not discard the glass
sampling tube; it can be reused after it has been cleaned by
surfactant or solvent washing.
3.4.2 Add 3.0 mL of methanol to
each vial and seal with a PTFE-lined cap.
3.4.3 Shake the vials
on a mechanical shaker for half an hour. 3.5 Analysis
3.5.1 Instrument conditions
Column: |
25-cm × 4.6-mm id, (5-µm ) Supelco
LC-DB-18 |
Mobile phase: |
75% ACN/25% water |
Flow rate: |
1 mL/min |
Injection volume: |
10 µL |
Detector wavelength: |
230 nm |
Retention time: |
6.00 min for piperonyl
butoxide. | 3.5.2 Chromatogram of piperonyl butoxide at detection
level.
3.5.3
Measure detector response using a suitable method such as electronic
integration. 3.6 Interferences
(analytical)
3.6.1 Any collected compound which
absorbs at 230 nm and has a similar retention time as piperonyl
butoxide is a potential interference.
3.6.2 HPLC conditions may
generally be varied to circumvent interferences.
3.6.3
Retention time on a single column is not proof of chemical identity.
Analysis by an alternate HPLC column and confirmation by mass
spectrometry are additional means of identification.
3.7 Calculations
3.7.1 A calibration curve may be
constructed by plotting concentration of analyte per mL versus
detector response. Bracket the samples with prepared analytical
standards over a range of concentrations.
3.7.2 Determine the
pg/mL of piperonyl butoxide in both sections of each sample and blank
from the calibration curve. If piperonyl butoxide is found on the
backup section, it is added to the amount found on the front section.
Blank corrections should be performed before adding the results
together.
3.7.3 Determine the air concentration by using the
following formula.
mg/m³ = |
(µg/mL, blank
corrected)(desorption volume, mL)
(air volume, L)(desorption efficiency,
decimal) |
ppm = |
(mg/m³)(24.46)
338.4 | 3.8
Safety precautions (analytical)
3.8.1 Avoid skin contact and air
exposure to piperonyl butoxide.
3.8.2 Avoid skin contact with
all solvents.
3.8.3 Wear safety glasses in laboratory.
4. Recommendation for
further Study
This method should be fully
validated.
5. References
5.1
"OSHA Analytical Methods Manual", U.S.Department of Labor occupational
Safety and Health Administration, OSHA Salt lake Technical Center, Utah,
Method 70, American Conference of Governmental Hygienists (ACGIH)
Cincinnati, 1985 ISBN 0-936712-66-X.
5.2 "Farm Chemicals Handbook";
Meister Publishing CO.: Willoughby, OH, 1992 ; p C265.
5.3
Windholz, M., Budavari, S., Blumetti, RF., and Otterbein, E., The Merck Index, 11th ed., Merck & CO., Inc.,
Rahway, N.J., 1983; p 1187
|