1. General Discussion
1.1 Background
1.1.1 History of procedure
The
OSHA Analytical Laboratory received a set of samples requesting the
analysis of pirimiphos-methyl and other pesticides. The samples had
been collected on OVS-2 tubes. This report describes the analytical
method developed.
1.1.2 Toxic effects (This section is for
information only and should not be taken as the basis of OSHA
policy.)
The oral LD50 for rats is 1250 mg/kg. (
Ref. 5.1) The acute dermal LD50 for female rats is greater
than 4592 mg/kg. (Ref. 5.2)
1.1.3 Potential workplace
exposure
Pirimiphos-methyl is a fast acting and broad-spectrum
insecticide. No estimate of worker exposure to pirimiphos-methyl could
be found. (Ref. 5.1)
1.1.4 Physical properties (Ref. 5.1 to
5.3)
Molecular weight: |
305.37 |
Molecular formula: |
C11H20N3O3PS |
CAS number: |
29232-93-7 |
IMIS number: |
P309 |
Specific gravity: |
1.157 |
Vapor pressure: |
0.015 Pa (1.1×10-4 mmHg) at
30°C |
Solubility: |
miscible with most organic solvents; in water,
5 mg/L at 30°C |
Chemical name: |
O-(2-diethylamino-6-methylpyrimidin-4-yl)O,O-dimethyl
phosphorothioate |
Synonyms: |
Actelic, Actellic, Actellifog, Blex, PP-511,
Silosan, Plant Protection PP511, Pyridimine Phosphate |
Description: |
straw colored liquid |
Structure: |
| 1.2
Limit defining parameters
The detection limit of the analytical
procedure, including a 15:1 split ratio, is 0.04 ng per injection. This
is the amount of analyte which will give a peak whose height is
approximately five times the baseline noise. 2. Sampling procedure
2.1 Apparatus
2.1.1 A personal sampling pump that
can be calibrated to within ± 5% of the recommended flow rate with the
sampling device in line.
2.1.2 OVS-2 tubes, which are specially
made 13 mm o.d. glass tubes that are tapered to 6 mm o.d., packed with
a 140-mg backup section, a 270-mg sampling section of cleaned XAD-2
adsorbent and a 13 mm diameter glass fiber filter. The backup section
is retained by two foam plugs and the sampling section is between one
foam plug and the glass fiber filter. The glass fiber filter is held
next to the sampling section by a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)
retainer.
Figure
2.1.2 OVS-2 Sampling
Tube
| 2.2
Reagents
No sampling reagents are required.
2.3 Sampling
technique
2.3.1 Immediately before sampling,
remove the plastic caps from the OVS-2 tube.
2.3.2 Attach the
small end of the tube to the sampling pump with flexible
tubing.
2.3.3 Attach the tube vertically in the employee's
breathing zone in such a manner that it does not impede work
performance.
2.3.4 After sampling for the appropriate time,
remove the tube and seal with plastic caps.
2.3.5 Wrap each
sample end-to-end with an OSHA seal (Form 21).
2.3.6 Record the
air volume for each sample, and list any possible
interferences.
2.3.7 Submit at least one blank for each set of
samples. Handle the blank in the same manner as the samples, except no
air is drawn through it.
2.3.8 Submit bulk samples for analysis
in a separate container. 2.4
Desorption efficiency (glass fiber filter and XAD-2 adsorbent)
Six vials each
containing a 13-mm glass fiber filter and 270-mg of XAD-2
adsorbent were each liquid spiked on the glass fiber filter with
74.57 µg of pirimiphos-methyl and allowed to dry for 2 hours.
These samples were each desorbed with 3 mL of acetonitrile, shaken
for 30 min and analyzed as in Section 3. The results are listed in
the Table below. |
|
Table
2.4 Desorption Efficiency
|
amount spiked, µg |
amount found, µg |
% recovered |
|
74.57 74.57 74.57 74.57 74.57 74.57 |
69.74 66.56 63.42 65.66 71.57 80.32 |
93.5 89.3 85.0 88.1 96.0 07.8 |
|
|
93.3 |
| | 2.5 Retention efficiency
Eighteen OVS-2 tubes
were each liquid spiked with 74.57 µg of pirimiphos-methyl on the
glass fiber filter. These were allowed to dry and then 240 L of
humid air (~80% relative humidity) were drawn through each tube at
1 L/min. Six of the tubes were each desorbed with 3 mL of
acetonitrile, shaken for 30 min and then analyzed as in Section 3.
The results are listed in the Table below. The remaining samples
were stored, 6 in a drawer at ambient temperature and 6 in a
freezer. |
|
Table
2.5 Retention Efficiency
|
amount spiked, µg |
amount found, µg |
% recovered |
|
74.57 74.57 74.57 74.57 74.57 74.57 |
73.25 67.58 66.17 65.19 75.58 77.21 |
98.2 90.6 88.7 87.4 100.0 103.5 |
|
|
94.7 |
| | 2.6 Sample storage
After 4 days of storage, 6
tubes, 3 from the ambient storage group and 3 from the freezer storage
group, were each desorbed with 3 mL of acetonitrile, shaken for 30 min
and then analyzed as in
Section 3. The remaining tubes were
desorbed and analyzed after 7 days of storage. The results are given in
the Tables below.
Table
2.6.1 Ambient Storage
|
days stored |
amount spiked, µg |
amount found, µg
|
% recovered |
|
4 4 4 7 7 7 |
74.57 74.57 74.57 74.57 74.57 74.57 |
69.68 67.76 72.34 71.12 67.66 72.53 |
93.4 90.9 97.0 95.4 90.7 97.3 |
|
|
of
4 of 7 |
93.8 94.5 |
| |
|
Table
2.6.2 Freezer Storage
|
days stored |
amount spiked, µg |
amount found, µg |
% recovered |
|
4 4 4 7 7 7 |
74.57 74.57 74.57 74.57 74.57 74.57 |
68.31 74.22 74.00 63.91 68.25 69.10 |
91.6 99.5 99.2 85.7 91.5 92.7
|
|
|
of
4 of 7 |
96.8 90.0 |
| | 2.7 Recommended air volume and sampling rate
2.7.1 The recommended air volume is
120 L.
2.7.2 The recommended flow rate is 1.0 L/min.
2.8 Interferences (sampling)
It
is not known if any compounds will interfere with the collection of
pirimiphos-methyl. Any suspected interference should be reported to the
laboratory.
2.9 Safety precautions (sampling)
2.9.1 Attach the sampling equipment in
such a manner that it will not interfere with work performance or
employee safety.
2.9.2 Follow all safety practices that apply
to the work area being sampled. 3. Analytical procedure
3.1 Apparatus
3.1.1 A balance capable of weighing to
the nearest tenth of a milligram. A Mettler HL52 balance was used in
this evaluation.
3.1.2 A mechanical shaker.
3.1.3 A GC
equipped with an ECD. A Hewlett Packard (HP) 5890 was used in this
evaluation.
3.1.4 A GC column capable of separating
pirimiphos-methyl from any interferences. A 15 m × 0.32 mm i.d. (1.0
µm film) DB-5 capillary column was used in this
evaluation.
3.1.5 An electronic integrator, or some other
suitable means for measuring detector response. The Hewlett-Packard
3357 Laboratory Data System was used in this evaluation.
3.1.6
Volumetric flasks and pipets.
3.1.7 Vials, 2-mL.
3.2 Reagents
3.2.1 Acetonitrile, reagent
grade.
3.2.2 Pirimiphos-methyl, reagent grade. A standard
obtained from EPA (EPA # 5643, 100% purity) was used in this
evaluation. 3.3 Standard
preparation
Prepare pirimiphos-methyl stock standards by weighing
10 to 15 mg of pirimiphos-methyl. Transfer the pirimiphos-methyl to
separate 10-mL volumetric flasks, and add acetonitrile to the mark. Make
working range standards of 0.5 to 50 µg/mL by pipet dilutions of the
stock standards with acetonitrile. Store stock and dilute standards in a
freezer.
3.4 Sample preparation
3.4.1 Transfer the 13-mm glass fiber
filter and the 270-mg sampling section of the tube to a 4-mL vial.
Place the first foam plug and the 140-mg section in a separate 4-mL
vial. A small glass funnel can be used to facilitate the transfer of
the adsorbent. Discard the rear foam plug. Do not discard the glass
sampling tube; it can be reused.
3.4.2 Add 3.0 mL of
acetonitrile to each vial and seal with a Teflon-lined cap.
3.4.3 Shake the vials for 30 minutes on
a mechanical shaker.
3.4.4 Transfer the samples to 2-mL vials for
use on an HP autosampler.
3.5. Analysis
3.5.1 Instrument
conditions
Column: |
DB-5, 15 m × 0.32 mm i.d., 1.0-µm film |
Injector temperature: |
275°C |
Column temperature: |
220°C |
Detector temperature: |
300°C |
Gas flows: |
|
Column: |
4 mL/min hydrogen |
ECD make up: |
42 mL/min nitrogen |
Injection volume: |
1.0 µL |
Split ratio: |
15:1 |
Retention time: |
3.06 min | 3.5.2 Chromatogram
Figure
3.5.2 Chromatogram of
Pirimiphos-methyl | 3.6 Interferences (analytical)
3.6.1 Any collected compound having a
similar retention time to that of the analyte is a potential
interference.
3.6.2 GC conditions may be varied to circumvent
interferences.
3.6.3 Retention time on a single column is not
proof of chemical identity. Analysis by an alternate GC column,
detection on a flame photometeric detector and confirmation by mass
spectrometry are additional means of identification.
3.7 Calculations
3.7.1 Construct a calibration curve by
plotting detector response versus concentration (µg/mL) of
pirimiphos-methyl.
3.7.2 Determine the µg/mL of
pirimiphos-methyl in both sections of each sample and blank from
the calibration curve.
3.7.3 Blank correct each section
by subtracting the µg/mL found in the blank section from the
µg/mL found in the sample section and then add the sections
together.
3.7.4 Determine the air concentration by
usingthe following formula. |
Figure
3.7.1 Calibration Curve |
mg/m3 = |
(mg/mL blank
corrected)(desorption volume, mL)
(air volume, L)(desorption efficiency,
decimal) | 3.8
Safety precautions (analytical)
3.8.1 Avoid skin contact and air
exposure to pirimiphos-methyl.
3.8.2 Avoid skin contact with
all solvents.
3.8.3 Wear safety glasses at all times.
4. Recommendation for
further study
This method should be fully validated.
5.
References
5.1 Farm Chemicals
Handbook; Berg, Gordon L. Ed.; Meister: Willoughby, Ohio, 1986; p
C6.
5.2 Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical
Substances 1985-86 Edition; U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services: Cincinnati, OH, 1987; DHHS(NIOSH) Publication No. 87-114, p
3425.
5.3 Merck Index, 10th ed.;
Windholz, Martha ED.; Merck: Rathway, N.J., 1983; p
1082.
|