|
Method no.: |
PV2027 |
|
|
Matrix: |
Air |
|
|
Target Concentration: |
0.1 mg/m3 Skin (ACGIH
TLV-TWA) |
|
|
Procedure: |
Samples are collected by drawing known
volumes of air through OSHA versatile sampler (OVS-2) tubes, each
containing a glass fiber filter and two sections of XAD-2 adsorbent.
Samples are desorbed with toluene and analyzed by gas chromatography
(GC) using a flame photometric detector (FPD). |
|
|
Recommended air volume and sampling
rate: |
480 L at 1.0 L/min |
|
|
Detection limit of the overall
procedure (based on the recommended air volume and the
analytical detection limit): |
0.00044
mg/m3 |
|
|
Status of method: |
Stopgap method. This method has been
partially evaluated and is presented for information and trial use
only. |
|
|
Date: July 1989 (final) |
Chemist: David B.
Armitage |
|
|
Please note: For problems
with accessibility in using figures and illustrations in this
method, please contact the author at (801) 233-4900. |
|
|
Carcinogen and Pesticide Branch OSHA Analytical
Laboratory Sandy, Utah
|
1. General
Discussion
1.1. Background
1.1.1. History of procedure
This evaluation
was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of the OVS-2 tube
as a sampling device for fonofos. It follows the procedure
developed for several other organophosphorus pesticides. (Ref.
5.1.)
1.1.2. Toxic effects (This section is for
information only and should not be taken as the basis of OSHA
policy).
The following paragraph is excerpted from the
book OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES, A Guide To Their Recognition. (Ref.
5.2.)
The organic phosphorus compounds act as
irreversible inhibitors of cholinesterase, thereby allowing
the accumulation of large amounts of acetylcholine. When a
critical level of choflinesterase depletion is reached,
usually about 20% of normal, symptoms and signs of
acetylbcholine accumulation poisoning become manibfest.
Symptoms may include blurred vision, weakness, nausea,
headache, abdominal cramps, chest discomfort, and diarrhea.
Signs may include miosis, muscle twitching, salivation,
sweating, tearing, cyanosis, convulsions, and coma.
Besides being absorbed following inhalation or
ingestion, organophosphorus pesticides are readily absorbed
through the intact skin (Ref.
5.2.). When a particular pesticide has a low dermal
LD50, a skin notation should be added to the TLV or
PEL.
Fonofos has an average acute oral LD50
of 3 mg/kg for female rats and 13 mg/kg for male rats. The acute
dermal LD50 for albino rats is 147 mg/kg. (Ref.
5.3.)
Great care should be taken to avoid eye
contact with fonofos. Technical grade fonofos (0.1 mL) instilled
into the eye of albino rabbits causes death. (Ref.
5.3.)
Due to these factors the ACGIH has established
a TLV-TWA of 0.1 mg/m3, with a skin notation, for
fonofos. (Ref.
5.3.)
In March 1989 OSHA adopted this same value as
its PEL. Editorial Note: These March 1989 PELs were vacated
on July 7, 1992 and ceased to be enforceable on March 23, 1993
(FR
58:35338-35351, 6/30/1993).
1.1.3. Potential
workplace exposure
No estimate of worker exposure to
fonofos could be found. Fonofos is used as soil insecticide. (Ref.
5.3.)
1.1.4. Physical properties (Ref.
5.3.-5.5.)
Molecular weight: |
246.32 |
Molecular
formula: |
C10H15OPS2 |
CAS #: |
944-22-9 |
IMIS#: |
2685 |
Boiling point: |
130°C at 13 Pa (0.1
mm Hg) |
Vapor Pressure: |
no information
found |
Appearance: |
light yellow
liquid |
Solubility: |
13 ppm in water at
20°C miscible with most organic solvents |
Synonyms: |
Dyfonate,
N-2790 |
Chemical name: |
O-ethyl S-phenyl
ethylphosphonothiolothionate |
|
Structure: |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9669f/9669fb69fa059333bf63c1866802fafd072bd949" alt="Structural Format of Fonofos Structural Format of Fonofos" | 1.2. Limit defining parameters
The detection
limit of the analytical procedure is 0.0079 ng per injection. This
is the amount of analyte which will give a peak whose height is
approximately five times the baseline noise. This detection limit
takes into account a split ratio of 13.4 to 1 used on the
capillary GC. 2. Sampling
Procedure
2.1. Apparatus
2.1.1. A personal sampling pump that can be
calibrated to within ±5% of the recommended flow rate with the
sampling device in line.
2.1.2. OVS-2 tubes, which are
specially made 13-mm o.d. glass tubes that are tapered to 6-mm
o.d. They are packed with a 140-mg backup section and a 270-mg
sampling section of cleaned XAD-2. The backup section is
retained by two foam plugs and the sampling section is between
one foam plug and a 13-mm diameter glass fiber filter. The glass
fiber filter is held next to the sampling section by a
polytetrrafluoroethylene (PTFE) retainer. (See
Figure 1.) 2.2. Reagents
No sampling
reagents are required.
2.3. Sampling technique
2.3.1. Attach the small end of the OVS-2 sampling
tube to the sampling pump with flexible, plastic tubing such
that the large, front section of the sampling tube is exposed
directly to the atmosphere. Do not place any tubing in front of
the sampler.
2.3.2. Attach the sampler vertically (large
end down) in the worker's breathing zone in such a manner that
it does not impede work performance.
2.3.3. After
sampling for the appropriate time, remove the sampling device
and seal the tube with plastic end caps.
2.3.4. Wrap
each sample end-to-end with an OSHA seal (Form 21).
2.3.5. Submit at least one blank with each set of
samples. Handle the blank the same as the other samples, but do
not draw air through it.
2.3.6. Submit any bulk samples
in a separate container. Do not ship them with the air samples.
2.4. Desorption efficiency
A glass fiber
filter and an amount of XAD-2 adsorbent equal to the sampling
section (270 mg) of an OVS-2 tube were placed in each of six 4-mL
vials. These vials were then sealed with PTFE-lined septa.
Five of these vials were then each liquid spiked with 23
µL of a 2.11 mg/mL solution of fonofos in toluene by injecting
through the septum onto the glass fiber filter. After replacing
the punctured septums, these vials were allowed to equilibrate
overnight in a drawer at room temperature. They were then desorbed
with 2.0 mL of toluene containing triphenyl phosphate (TPP) as an
internal standard and analyzed as in Section 3.5.
Table
2.4. Desorption Study |
|
Vial # |
Amount spiked |
Amount
recovered |
% Recovery |
|
EX 1 |
48.53 µg |
48.53 µg |
100.0 |
EX 2 |
48.53 µg |
48.82 µg |
100.6 |
EX 3 |
48.53 µg |
48.68 µg |
100.3 |
EX 4 |
48.53 µg |
49.21 µg |
101.4 |
EX 5 |
48.53 µg |
48.24 µg |
99.4 |
EX 6 |
0.00 µg |
0.00 µg |
Blank |
|
Average
recovery is 100.3% |
2.5. Retention efficiency
Six OVS-2 tubes
were each liquid spiked with 23 µL of a 2.11 mg/mL solution of
fonofos in toluene by spiking the glass fiber filter. These tubes
were then sealed with plastic end caps and placed in a drawer at
room temperature. After overnight storage, 480 liters of humid air
(approximately 70% relative humidity) were drawn through each
tube. Three of these tubes, along with a blank tube, were then
desorbed and analyzed as in Section 3. No fonofos was found on the
backup sections of these tubes.
Table
2.5. Retention Efficiency Study |
|
Tube # |
Amount spiked |
Amount
recovered |
% Recovery |
|
RET 1 |
48.53 µg |
45.47 µg |
93.7 |
RET 2 |
48.53 µg |
48.58 µg |
100.1 |
RET 3 |
48.53 µg |
48.04 µg |
99.0 |
RET 4 |
0.00 µg |
0.00 µg |
Blank |
|
Average
recovery is 97.6% |
2.6. Sample storage
The remaining three
spiked tubes from Section 2.5. (and a blank tube) were stored for
a total of 8 days in a drawer at room tem perature. They were then
desorbed and analyzed as in Section 3. No fonofos was found in the
backup sections of these tubes.
Table
2.6. Storage Study |
|
Tube # |
Amount spiked |
Amount
recovered |
% Recovery |
|
ST 1 |
48.53 µg |
partial
sample loss |
ST 2 |
48.53 µg |
47.56 µg |
98.0 |
ST 3 |
48.53 µg |
49.02 µg |
101.0 |
ST 4 |
0.00 µg |
0.00 µg |
Blank |
|
Average
recovery (excluding ST 1) is
99.5% |
2.7.
Recommended air volume and sampling rate
2.7.1. The recommended air volume is 480 L.
2.7.2. The recommended flow rate is 1.0 L/min.
2.8. Interferences (sampling)
It is not known
if any compounds will interfere with the collection of fonofos.
Suspected interferences should be reported to the laboratory with
submitted samples.
2.9. Safety precautions (sampling)
2.9.1. Attach the sampling equipment in such a
manner that it will not interfere with work performance or
employee safety.
2.9.2. Follow all safety practices that
apply to the work area being sampled.
3. Analytical
Procedure
3.1. Apparatus
3.1.1. A GC equipped with an FPD. A Hewlett-Packard
5890A GC (capillary) equipped with both an FPD operating in the
phosphorus mode and a Hewlett-Packard 7673A automatic sampler
was used in this evaluation.
3.1.2. A GC column capable
of separating fonofos from any interferences. A 45 m × 0.2 mm
i.d. SE-54 capillary column, 0.25 µm thick film, was used in
this evaluation and is available from Supelco, Inc., Bellefonte,
PA.
3.1.3. An electronic integrator or other suitable
means of measuring detector response. A Hewlett-Packard 3392A
Integrator and a Hewlett-Packard 3357 data system were used in
this evaluation.
3.1.4. Vials, 4-mL and 2-mL glass with
PTFE-lined septa.
3.1.5. Volumetric flasks, pipets, and
syringes. 3.2. Reagents
3.2.1. Hydrogen, air, and nitrogen, GC grade.
3.2.2. Toluene, Pesticide grade.
3.2.3. Fonofos.
A 99.7% pure standard from EPA was used in this evaluation.
3.2.4. Triphenyl phosphate (TPP), practical grade from
J.T. Baker. If an internal standard method is used, the
desorbing solution is prepared by adding the internal standard
to the toluene. A 40 µg/mL solution of TPP was used as the
internal standard in this evaluation. 3.3. Standard
preparation
Prepare stock standards by adding either
toluene or desorbing solution (if an internal standard is used) to
preweighed amounts of fonofos. Prepare working range standards by
diluting stock solutions with either toluene or desorbing solution
(if an internal standard is used). Store stock and dilute
standards in a freezer.
3.4. Sample preparation
3.4.1. Transfer the 13-mm glass fiber filter and the
270-mg sampling section of the tube to a 4-mL vial. Place the
first foam plug and the 140-mg backup section in a separate
vial. A small glass funnel can be used to facilitate the
transfer of the adsorbent. Discard the rear foam plug. Do not
discard the glass sampling tube, it can be reused.
3.4.2. Add 2.0 mL of either toluene or desorbing
solution (if an internal standard is used) to each vial.
3.4.3. Seal the vials with PTFE-lined septa and allow
them to desorb for one hour. Shake the vials by hand
periodically during this time.
3.4.4. If necessary,
transfer aliquots of the samples to the vials used in GC
analysis. In this evaluation the samples were transferred to
2-mL glass vials, sealed with PTFE-lined septa and loaded on the
automatic sampler. 3.5. Analysis
3.5.1. Analytical conditions (These conditions were
developed for a series of organophosphorus pesticides, which was
run in several groups. See Figure 2. for the group containing
fonofos.)
GC
conditions
|
|
GC
column: |
45 m × 0.2 mm i.d.
SE-54, 0.25 µm thick film |
Carrier gas: |
hydrogen |
Flow rate: |
2.05 mL/min at
220°C |
Split ratio: |
13.4 to 1 at
220°C |
Retention time: |
5.75 min |
|
Injector
conditions
|
|
Temperature: |
250°C |
Volume: |
1 µL |
|
Oven
temperature program
|
|
Initial
temperature: |
220°C |
Initial time: |
5 min |
Rate: |
15°C/min |
Final
temperature: |
260°C |
Final time: |
15 min |
|
FPD
conditions
|
|
Hydrogen flow
rate: |
75 mL/min |
Air flow rate: |
100 mL/min |
Auxiliary gas: |
nitrogen |
Flow rate: |
28 mL/min |
Temperature: |
250°C |
3.5.2. Chromatogram (See
Figure 2.) 3.6.
Interferences (analytical)
3.6.1. Any compound having a similar retention time
to that of the analyte is a potential interference. Generally,
chromatographic conditions can be altered to separate
interferences from the analyte.
3.6.2. Retention time on
a single column is not proof of chemical identity. Analysis by
an alternate GC column, detection by an FPD in the sulfur mode
and confirmation by mass spectrometry are additional means of
identification. 3.7. Calculations
3.7.1. Construct a calibration curve by plotting
detector response versus standard concentration.
3.7.2.
Determine the concentration of fonofos in each sample from the
calibration curve. If fonofos is found on the backup section,
make blank corrections for each section separately before adding
the results together.
3.7.3. Determine the air
concentration by the following formula.
mg/m3 = |
(µg/mL in
sample) × (extraction volume in mL)
(air volume in liters) × (desorption
efficiency) | 3.8. Safety precautions (analytical)
3.8.1. Avoid exposure to all standards.
3.8.2. Avoid exposure to all solvents.
3.8.3.
Wear safety glasses at all times.
4.
Recommendations for Further Study
This method should be
fully validated.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d721/9d721b4c6cf165b30131faff53ae734b36f25026" alt="Please note: For problems with accessibility in using figures and illustrations in this method, please contact the author at (801) 233-4900. Please note: For problems with accessibility in using figures and illustrations in this method, please contact the author at (801) 233-4900."
Figure 1. OVS-2
Sampling Device |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/085d8/085d8f8641661126265ff7de106c935d7f148d12" alt="Please note: For problems with accessibility in using figures and illustrations in this method, please contact the author at (801) 233-4900. Please note: For problems with accessibility in using figures and illustrations in this method, please contact the author at (801) 233-4900."
Figure 2.
Chromatogram of Fonofos This chromatogram also contains TPP
and other pesticides. |
5. References
5.1. Burright, D.; Method #62, "Chlorpyrifos, DDVP,
Diazinon, Malathion, and Parathion"; OSHA Analytical Laboratory,
unpublished, 1986.
5.2. "OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES, A Guide to
their Recognition"; U.S. Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare; Public Health Service, Public Health Service Publication
No. 1097, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, D.C., 1964;
p 245.
5.3. "Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values
and Biological Exposure Indices", 5th ed.; American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists: Cincinnati, OH, 1986; p 275.
5.4. "Farm Chemicals Handbook"; Meister Publishing Co.:
Willoughby, OH, 1986; p C95.
5.5. Windholz, M., Ed.;
"Merck Index", 10th ed.; Merck and Co.: Rah way, NJ, 1983; p 604.
|
|
| |