BUTYL ACRYLATE
Method number: |
PV2011 |
|
Matrix: |
Air |
|
Target Concentration: |
10 ppm (55 mg/m3) OSHA permissible
exposure limit (PEL). |
|
Procedure: |
Samples are collected by drawing known volumes of air through
glass sampling tubes containing charcoal adsorbent which has been
coated with 4-tert-butylcatechol (TBC). Samples are desorbed with
carbon disulfide and analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) using a
flame ionization detector (FID). |
|
Recommended air volume and sampling rate: |
12 L at 0.05 L/min |
|
Detection limit of the overall procedure (based on
the recommended air volume and the analytical detection
limit): |
0.25 ppm (1.4
mg/m3) |
|
Status of method: |
Stopgap method. This method has been partially evaluated and is
presented for information and trial use only. |
|
Date: October 1991 (Final) |
Chemist: Ing-Fong
Chan |
Organic Service Branch II OSHA Technical Center Salt
Lake City, Utah
1. General Discussion
1.1. Background
1.1.1. History of procedure
This evaluation was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of
the TBC-coated charcoal tube as a sampling device for
butyl acrylate. TBC-coated charcoal tubes were
initially used for 1,3-Butadiene in OSHA
Method 56 (Ref. 5.1.).
1.1.2. Toxic effects (This section is for information only and
should not be taken as the basis of OSHA policy.)
Butyl acrylate has an oral LD50 of 3.73
g/kg in rats (Ref. 5.2.).
The dermal LD50 for rabbits was about 1800
mg/kg. Butyl acrylate was found to be moderately irritating to the
skin, and as an eye irritant, produced corneal necrosis in the
unwashed rabbit eye, similar to that produced by ethyl alcohol (Ref.
5.3.).
1.1.3. Potential workplace exposure
The monomer of butyl acrylate is used in the manufacture of
acrylate polymers and resins for textile and leather finishes. It is
also used in paint formulations (Ref. 5.2.).
1.1.4. Physical properties (Ref. 5.2.
and 5.3.)
CAS number: |
141-32-2 |
IMIS number: |
0450 |
Molecular weight: |
128.17 |
Molecular formula: |
C7H12O2
|
Density: |
0.8986 |
Boiling point: |
145°C at 101.3 kPa (760 mmHg) |
Solubility: |
in water at 20°C = 0.14 g/100 ml, at 40°C =
0.12 g/100 ml |
Chemical name: |
Acrylic acid n-butyl ester; Butyl
2-propenoate |
Appearance: |
monomer: colorless, flammable
liquid polymer: Elastic, tacky substance |
Structure: |
CH2=CHCOOC4H9 |
1.2. Limit defining parameters
The detection limit of the analytical procedure, including a 7:1
split ratio, is 2.4 ng per injection. This is the amount of analyte
which will give a peak whose height is approximately five times the
baseline noise.
2. Sampling Procedure
2.1. Apparatus
2.1.1. Samples are collected by using a personal sampling pump
that can be calibrated to within ± 5% of the recommended flow rate
with the sampling device in line.
2.1.2. Samples are collected with 4-mm i.d. × 6-mm o.d. × 7.0 cm
glass sampling tubes packed with two sections of charcoal that has
been coated with 10% by weight of TBC. The front section contains
100-mg and the back section contains 50-mg of
TBC-coated charcoal. The sections are held in place
with glass wool plugs. Tubes were purchased from SKC, Inc. (catalog
no. 226-73).
2.2. Reagents
No sampling reagents are required.
2.3. Sampling technique
2.3.1. Immediately before sampling, break off the ends of the
TBC-coated charcoal tube. All tubes should be from the
same lot.
2.3.2. Attach the sampling tube to the sampling pump with
flexible tubing. Position the tube so that sampled air first passes
through the 100-mg section.
2.3.3. Attach the tube vertically in the employee's breathing
zone in such a manner that it does not impede work performance.
2.3.4. After sampling for the appropriate time, remove the sample
and seal the tube with plastic caps.
2.3.5. Wrap each sample end-to-end with an OSHA seal (Form 21).
2.3.6. Record the air volume for each sample, and list any
possible interferences.
2.3.7. Submit at least one blank for each set of samples. Handle
the blank in the same manner as the samples, except no air is drawn
through it.
2.3.8. Submit bulk samples for analysis in a separate container.
Do not ship them with air samples.
2.4. Desorption efficiency
Sixteen vials, each containing 100-mg portion of
TBC-coated charcoal, were divided into four groups of
four vials each. They were liquid spiked with 67.4, 337, 674, and 1348
µg of butyl acrylate, respectively. These represent 0.1×, 0.5×, 1.0×,
and 2.0× the target concentration. The vials were stored overnight in
a freezer (-5°C), desorbed with 1.0 mL of the desorbing solution,
shaken for 30 min, and analyzed as in section 3. The average
desorption efficiency was 100.1%. The results are listed in Table 2.4.
Table 2.4. Desorption Efficiency
|
Sample # |
Amount Spiked,
µg |
Amount Found,
µg |
% Recovered |
|
D6 D7 D8 D9 |
67.4 67.4 67.4 67.4 |
69.4 67.8 69.3 68.9 |
103.0 100.6 102.8 102.2 |
|
Average of 0.1× PEL =
102.2% |
|
D10 D11 D12 D13 |
337 337 337 337 |
334 346 344 351 |
99.1 102.7 102.1 104.2 |
|
Average of 0.5× PEL =
102.0% |
|
D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 |
674 674 674 674 Blank |
617 655 668 681 0 |
91.5 97.2 99.1 101.0 Blank |
|
Average of 1× PEL =
97.2% |
|
DD1 DD2 DD3 DD4 |
1348 1348 1348 1348 |
1327 1310 1334 1354 |
98.4 97.2 99.0 100.4 |
|
Average of 2× PEL =
98.8% |
|
2.5. Retention efficiency
Five TBC-coated charcoal tubes were each liquid spiked
with 3 µl (1× PEL) of a 225 µg/µl solution of butyl acrylate in carbon
disulfide. These were allowed to dry for 2 hours and then 12 L of
humid air (~80% relative humidity) were drawn through each tube at
0.05 L/min. The tubes were stored overnight in a freezer (-5°C),
desorbed with 1.0 mL of desorbing solution, shaken for 30 min and then
analyzed as in Section 3. The results are listed in Table 2.5.
Table 2.5. Retention Efficiency
|
Sample # |
Amount Spiked,
µg |
Amount Found,
µg |
% Recovered |
|
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 |
674 674 674 674 674 |
638 635 654 637 649 |
94.7 94.2 97.0 94.5 96.3 |
|
|
Average = 95.3% |
|
2.6. Sample storage
Ten TBC-coated charcoal tubes were each liquid spiked
with 3 µl (1× PEL) of 225 µg/µl solution of butyl acrylate in carbon
disulfide. These were allowed to dry for 2 hours and then 12 L of
humid air (~80% relative humidity) were drawn through each tube at
0.05 L/min. Half of the tubes were stored in a drawer at ambient
temperature, and the other half were stored in a freezer (-5°C). After
ten days they were extracted and analyzed as in section 3. The results
are given in Tables 2.6.1. and 2.6.2.
Table 2.6.1. Ambient Storage
|
Days Stored |
Amount Spiked,
µg |
Amount Found,
µg |
% Recovered |
|
10 10 10 10 10 |
674 674 674 674 674 |
629 629 635 635 634 |
93.3 93.3 94.2 94.2 94.1 |
|
|
Average = 93.8% |
|
Table 2.6.2 Freezer Storage
|
Days Stored |
Amount Spiked,
µg |
Amount Found,
µg |
% Recovered |
|
10 10 10 10 10 |
674 674 674 674 674 |
633 652 649 654 649 |
93.9 96.7 96.3 97.0 96.3 |
|
|
Average = 96.0% |
|
2.7. Recommended air volume and sampling rate
2.7.1. The recommended air volume is 12 L.
2.7.2. The recommended flow rate is 0.05 L/min.
2.8. Interferences (sampling)
It is not known if any compounds will interfere with the collection
of butyl acrylate. Any suspected interferences should be reported to
the laboratory with submitted samples.
2.9. Safety precautions (sampling)
2.9.1. Attach the sampling equipment in such a manner that it
will not interfere with work performance or employee safety.
2.9.2. Follow all safety practices that apply to the work area
being sampled.
3. Analytical Procedure
3.1. Apparatus
3.1.1. A GC equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID). A
Hewlett-Packard 5890 Gas Chromatograph equipped with a 7673A
Autosampler and FID was used in this evaluation.
3.1.2. A GC column capable of separating butyl acrylate and the
internal standard from any interferences. A 60 m × 0.32 mm i.d.
(0.25 µm film) DX-4 capillary column was used in this evaluation.
3.1.3. An electronic integrator or some other suitable means to
measure detector response. A Waters 860 Networking Computer System
was used in this evaluation.
3.1.4. Volumetric flasks, pipets, and syringes for preparing
standards, making dilutions and performing injections.
3.1.5. Vials, 2-mL, and 4-mL, with PTFE-lined caps.
3.2. Reagents
3.2.1. Butyl acrylate. Reagent grade or better should be used.
Eastman Chemical Co. product was used in this evaluation.
3.2.2. Desorbing solution. Reagent grade or better should be
used. Fisher Scientific carbon disulfide was used in this
evaluation. p-Cymene (0.25 µL p-Cymene/mL carbon disulfide) was
added for use as an internal standard. p-Cymene was purchased from
Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc.
3.3. Standard preparation
Prepare standards by diluting known volumes of butyl acrylate with
desorbing solution. Standards must be used the day they are prepared.
3.4. Sample preparation
3.4.1. Transfer the 100-mg section of the sampling tube to a
2-mL vial. Place the 50-mg backup section in a separate 2-mL vial.
3.4.2. Add 1.0 mL of desorbing solution to each vial and seal
with a Teflon-lined cap.
3.4.3. Shake the vials for 30 minutes on a mechanical shaker.
3.5. Analysis
3.5.1. Instrument conditions
Column: |
DX-4, 60 m × 0.32 mm i.d., 0.25 µm film |
Injector temperature: |
200°C |
Detector temperature: |
220°C |
Column temperature: |
70°C (initial temp) |
Temperature program: |
hold initial temp 3 min, increase temp at
10°C/min to 220°C, hold temp 5 min |
Gas flow rates: |
|
column: septum
purge: FID: FID: FID: |
1.5 mL/min (hydrogen) 1.2 mL/min
(hydrogen) 19 mL/min (hydrogen) 10 mL/min
(nitrogen) 480 mL/min (air) |
Injection volume: |
1 µL |
Split ratio: |
7:1 |
Retention time: |
1.97 min (Butyl acrylate) 4.38 min
(p-Cymene) |
3.5.2. An extended chromatographic run time was used to remove
the late eluting TBC from the analytical column.
3.5.3. Chromatogram (Figure
1.)
3.5.4. Measure detector response using a suitable method such as
electronic integration.
3.5.5. An internal standard (ISTD) calibration method is used. A
calibration curve may be constructed by plotting concentration of
analyte per sample versus ISTD-corrected response of standard
injections. Bracket the samples with freshly prepared analytical
standards over a range of concentrations.
3.6. Interferences (analytical)
3.6.1. Any collected compound which produces an FID response and
has a similar retention time as butyl acrylate or the internal
standard is a potential interference.
3.6.2. GC conditions may generally be varied to circumvent
interferences.
3.6.3. Retention time on a single column is not proof of chemical
identity. Analysis by an alternate GC column, high performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC) and confirmation by mass spectrometry
are additional means of identification.
3.7. Calculations
3.7.1. A calibration curve may be constructed by plotting
detector response versus ISTD-corrected response of
standard concentration (µg/mL) of butyl acrylate.
3.7.2. Determine the µg/mL of butyl acrylate in both sections of
each sample and blank from the calibration curve. If butyl acrylate
is found on the backup section, it is added to the amount found on
the front section. Blank corrections should be performed before
adding the results together.
3.7.3. Determine the air concentration by using the following
formula.
mg/m3 = |
(µg/mL, blank corrected) ×
(desorption volume, mL)
(air volume, L) × (desorption efficiency,
decimal) |
ppm = |
(mg/m3)(24.46)
(128.17) |
where |
24.46 128.17 |
= = |
molar volume (liters) at 101.3 kPa (760 mmHg)
and 25°C molecular weight of butyl
acrylate |
3.8. Safety precautions (analytical)
3.8.1. Avoid skin contact and air exposure to butyl acrylate.
3.8.2. Avoid skin contact with all solvents.
3.8.3. Wear safety glasses at all times.
4. Recommendation for Further Study
This method should be fully validated.
Figure 1. Chromatogram of butyl acrylate
5. References
5.1. "OSHA Analytical Methods Manual", 2nd ed.,
U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration; OSHA Analytical Laboratory; Salt Lake City, UT, 1990;
Method 56 - 1,3-Butadiene; American Conference of
Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH); Cincinnati, OH, Publ. No.
4542.
5.2. Merck Index, 10th ed.; Windholz,
Martha ED.; Merck: Rahway, N.J., 1983; p1512.
5.3. Documentation of the Threshold Limit
Values and Biological Exposure Indices, American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienist INC., fifth edition, 1986; p 75.
|