  | 
          
            DIMETHOATE | 
            |   
       
      
        
        
          | Method no.: | 
          PV2113 |  
        
          
  |  
        
          | Control no.: | 
          T-PV2113-01-9206-CH |  
        
          
  |  
        
          | Matrix: | 
          Air |  
        
          
  |  
        
          | Target Concentration: | 
          0.2 mg/m3 (0.021 ppm) Skin (Arbitrary) |  
        
          
  |  
        
          | Procedure: | 
          Samples are collected by drawing known volumes of air through 
            OSHA versatile sampler (OVS-2) tubes. Each tube contains a glass 
            fiber filter and two sections of XAD-2 adsorbent. Samples are 
            desorbed with toluene and analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) using 
            a flame photometric detector (FPD). |  
        
          
  |  
        
          | Recommended air volume and sampling rate: | 
          480 L at 1.0 L/min |  
        
          
  |  
        
          | Detection limit of the overall procedure (based on 
            the recommended air volume and the analytical detection limit): | 
          0.004 mg/m3 (0.43 ppb) |  
        
          
  |  
        
          | Status of method: | 
          Partially evaluated method. This method has been partially 
            evaluated and is presented for information and trial use only. |  
        
          
  |  
        
          | June 1992 (Final) | 
          
             Chemist: Ing-Fong Chan  |   
      Organic Service Branch II OSHA Technical Center Salt 
      Lake City, Utah 
      
        - General Discussion 
        
1.1 Background 
        
          1.1.1 History of procedure 
          This evaluation was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of 
          the OVS-2 tube as a sampling device for dimethoate. It follows the 
          procedure developed for several other organophosphorus pesticides 
          (Ref. 5.1). 
          1.1.2 Toxic effects (This Section is for information only and 
          should not be taken as the basis of OSHA policy).
           
           The following paragraph is excerpted from the book OCCUPATIONAL 
          DISEASE, A Guide To Their Recognition (Ref. 5.2). 
          The organic phosphorus compounds act as irreversible inhibitors of 
          cholinesterase, thereby allowing the accumulation of large amounts of 
          acetylcholine. When a critical level of cholinesterase depletion is 
          reached, usually about 20% of normal, symptoms and signs of 
          acetylcholine accumulation poisoning become manifest. Symptoms may 
          include blurred vision, weakness, nausea, headache, abdominal cramps, 
          chest discomfort, and diarrhea. Signs may include miosis, muscle 
          twitching, salivation, sweating, tearing, cyanosis, convulsions, and 
          coma. 
          Besides being absorbed following inhalation or ingestion, 
          arganophosphorus pesticides are readily adsorbed through the intact 
          skin (ref. 5.2). When a particular pesticide has a low dermal 
          LD50, a skin notation should be added to the TLV or PEL. 
           Dimethoate has an acute oral LD50 of 152 mg/Kg and acute 
          dermal LD50 of 353 mg/Kg for rats (Ref. 5.3). 
          Due to these factors an arbitrary target concentration of 0.2 
          mg/m3, with a skin notation, ws chosen for dimethoate. 
          1.1.3 Potential workplace exposure 
          Domethoate is a systematic insecticide/acaricide used to spray 
          walls of farm buildings to control houseflies and in the control of 
          insects on ornamental plants, vegetables, fruits, and farm crops. no 
          data is available on the extent of work place exposure (Ref. 5.4). 
          1.1.4 Physical properties (Ref. 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5) 
          
            
              
              
                | CAS number: | 
                60-51-5 |  
              
                | IMIS number: | 
                D617 |  
              
                | Molecular weight: | 
                229.3 |  
              
                | Molecular formula: | 
                C5H12NO3PS2 |  
              
                 | 
                 |  
              
                | Melting point: | 
                52 to 52.5°C at 101.3 kPa (760 mmHg) |  
              
                | Solubility: | 
                very slightly soluble in water freely soluble 
                  in most organic solvents, except saturated hydrocarbons. |  
              
                | Chemical name: | 
                Dimethoate |  
              
                | Synonyms: | 
                Phosphorodithioic acid, 0,0-Dimethyl 
                  S-[2-(methylamino)-2-oxoethyl]ester; 0,0-Dimethyl 
                  S-(N-Methylcarbamoylmethyl) Phosphorodithioate; Cygon; Fostion 
                  MM; Perfekthion; Rogor; Roxion |  
              
                | Appearance: | 
                white crystals |  
              
                | Structure: | 
                  |      
        1.2 Limit defining parameters 
        The detection limit of the analytical procedure, including a 12.5:1 
        split ratio, is 0.078 ng per injection. This is the amount of analyte 
        which will give a peak whose height is approximately five times the 
        baseline noise. 
         - 
        
Sampling Procedure 
        2.1 Apparatus 
        2.1.1 A sample is collected by using a personal sampling 
          pump that can be calibrated to within ±5% of the recommended flow rate 
          with the sampling device in line. 
          2.1.2 OVS-2 tubes, which are specially made 13-mm o.d. They are 
          packed with a 140-mg backup section and a 270-mg sampling section of 
          cleaned XAD-2. The backup section is retained by two foam plugs and 
          the sampling section is between one foam plug and a 13-mm diameter 
          glass fiber filter. The glass fiber filter is held next to the 
          sampling section by a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) retainer. These 
          tubes are commercially available. 
            
          Figure 1.  OVS-2 Sampling 
        Device  
        2.2 Reagents 
        No sampling reagents are required. 
        2.3 Sampling technique 
        2.3.1 Attach the small end of the OVS-2 sampling tube to 
          the sampling pump with flexible plastic tubing such that the large 
          front section of the sampling tube is exposed directly to the 
          atmosphere. Do not place any tubing in front of the sampler. 
          2.3.2 Attach the sampler vertically (large end down) in the 
          employee's breathing zone in such a manner that it does not impede 
          work performance. 
          2.3.3 After sampling for the appropriate time, remove the sampling 
          device and seal the tube with plastic end caps. 
          2.3.4 Wrap each sample end-to-end with an OSHA seal (Form 21). 
          2.3.5 Record the air volume for each sample and list any possible 
          interferences. 
          2.3.6 Submit at least one blank with each set of samples. Handle 
          the blank in the same manner as the other samples, except that no air 
          is drawn through it. 
          2.3.7 Submit any bulk samples for analysis in a separate container. 
          Do not ship bulk samples with the air samples.  
        2.4 Desorption efficiency 
        A 13-mm glass fiber filter and a amount of XAD-2 adsorbent equal to 
        the sampling section (270 mg) of an OVS-2 tube were placed in each of 
        nine 4-ml vials. They were divided into three groups of three vials. 
        These groups were liquid spiked respectively with 9.5, 19 and 38µL of 
        5.15 mg/mL solution of dimethoate in toluene by spiking the glass fiber 
        filter. These amounts represent 0.5×, 1.0×, and 2.0× the target 
        concentration. They were then sealed with PTFE-lined septa and allowed 
        to equilibrate overnight in a drawer at room temperature. The tubes, 
        along with a blank tube, were desorbed with 2.0 mL of the desorbing 
        solution, and analyzed as in section 3. The average desorption 
        efficiency was 97.1%. The results are listed in Table 2.4. 
        
          Table 2.4 Desorption Efficiency
            
            
              
                 
               | 
             
              |  Sample 
# | 
               Amount Spiked, µg | 
               Amount Found, 
              µg  | 
               % Recovered |  
            
              | D1 | 
               48.9 | 
               46.8 | 
                95.7 |  
            
              | D2 | 
               48.9 | 
               47.9 | 
                98.0 |  
            
              | D3 | 
               48.9 | 
               50.2 | 
              102.3 |  
            
               | 
               | 
                  Average 
                of 0.5× PEL= 98.7%    |  
            
              |   | 
                | 
                | 
                |  
            
              | D4 | 
               97.9 | 
               93.5 | 
                95.5 |  
            
              | D5 | 
               97.9 | 
               92.8 | 
                94.8 |  
            
              | D6 | 
               97.9 | 
               98.2 | 
              100.3 |  
            
               | 
               | 
                  Average 
                of 1.0× PEL = 96.9%     |  
            
              |   | 
                | 
                | 
                |  
            
              | D7 | 
              195.7 | 
              186.1 | 
                95.1 |  
            
              | D8 | 
              195.7 | 
              189.0 | 
                96.6 |  
            
              | D9 | 
              195.7 | 
              187.3 | 
                95.7 |  
            
              |   D10 | 
                 0.0 | 
                 0.0 | 
               Blank |  
            
               | 
               | 
                  Average 
                of 2.0× PEL = 95.8%    |  
            
              
                 
               |     
        2.5 Retention efficiency 
        Four OVS-2 tubes were each liquid spiked with 19 µL (1× PEL) of 5.15 
        mg/mL solution of dimethoate in toluene by spiking the glass fiber 
        filter. These were allowed to equilibrate overnight in a drawer at room 
        temperature and then 480 L of humid air (~80% relative humidity) were 
        drawn through each tube at 1.0 L/min. The tubes, along with a blank 
        tube, were desorbed with 2.0 mL of desorbing solution, and analyzed as 
        in Section 3. No analyte was observed in backup sections. The results 
        are listed in Table 2.5. 
        
          Table 2.5 Retention Efficiency
            
            
              
                 
               | 
             
              |  Sample 
# | 
               Amount Spiked, µg | 
               Amount Found, 
              µg  | 
               % Recovered |  
            
              | R1 | 
               97.9 | 
               92.3 | 
                94.3 |  
            
              | R2 | 
               97.9 | 
               95.3 | 
                97.3 |  
            
              | R3 | 
               97.9 | 
               95.2 | 
                97.2 |  
            
              | R4 | 
               97.9 | 
               98.0 | 
               100.1 |  
            
              | R5 | 
                 0.0 | 
                 0.0 | 
               BLANK |  
            
              |   | 
                | 
                | 
                |  
            
               | 
               | 
                            
                     Average = 97.2%    |  
            
              
                 
               |     
        2.6 Sample storage 
        Eight OVS-2 tubes were each liquid spiked with 19 µL (1× PEL)of 5.15 
        mg/mL solution in toluene by spiking the glass fiber filter. These tubes 
        were allowed to equilibrate overnight in a drawer at room temperature 
        and then 480 L of humid air (~80% relative humidity) were drawn through 
        each tube at 1.0 L/min. The eight tubes were divided into two groups of 
        four tubes each. The fires group was stored in a drawer at ambient 
        temperature, the second group was stored in a freezer (-5°C). After 
        seven days they were extracted and analyzed as in Section 3. No analyte 
        was observed n backup sections. The results are given in Tables 2.6.1, 
        and 2.6.2. 
        
          
            Table 2.6.1 Ambient Storage
            
            
              
                 
               | 
             
               Days Stored | 
               Amount Spiked, µg | 
               Amount Found, 
              µg  | 
               % Recovered |  
            
              | 7 | 
               97.9 | 
               94.1 | 
                96.1 |  
            
              | 7 | 
               97.9 | 
               96.3 | 
                98.4 |  
            
              | 7 | 
               97.9 | 
               97.2 | 
                99.3 |  
            
              | 7 | 
               97.9 | 
               97.0 | 
                99.0 |  
            
              | 7 | 
                 0.0 | 
                 0.0 | 
               BLANK |  
            
              |   | 
                | 
                | 
                |  
            
               | 
               | 
                                 
                Average = 98.2%    |  
            
              
                 
               |    
          
            Table 2.6.2 Freezer Storage
            
            
              
                 
               | 
             
               Days Stored | 
               Amount Spiked, µg | 
               Amount Found, 
              µg  | 
               % Recovered |  
            
              | 7 | 
               97.9 | 
               96.7 | 
                98.8 |  
            
              | 7 | 
               97.9 | 
               98.7 | 
               100.8 |  
            
              | 7 | 
               97.9 | 
               96.4 | 
                 98.5 |  
            
              | 7 | 
               97.9 | 
               99.2 | 
               101.3 |  
            
              |   | 
                | 
                | 
                |  
            
               | 
               | 
                             
                     Average = 99.9%    |  
            
              
                 
               |     
        2.7 Recommended air volume and sampling rate 
        
          2.7.1 The recommended air volume is 480 L. 
          2.7.2 The recommended flow rate is 1.0 L/min.  
        2.8 Interferences (sampling) 
        It is not known if any compounds will interfere with the collection 
        of dimethoate. Any suspected interferences should be reported to the 
        laboratory with submitted samples. 
        2.9 Safety precautions (sampling) 
        
          2.9.1 Attach the sampling equipment in such a manner that it will 
          not interfere with work performance or employee safety. 
          2.9.2 Follow all safety practices that apply to the work area being 
          sampled.  
         - 
        
Analytical Procedure 
        3.1 Apparatus 
        3.1.1 A GC equipped with an FPD. A Hewlett-Packard 5890A 
          GC (capillary equipped with both an FPD operating in the phosphorus 
          mode and a Hewlett-Packard 7673A Autosampler was used in this 
          evaluation. 
          3.1.2 A GC column capable of separating dimethoate from any 
          interferences. A 30 m × 0.32 mm i.d. (0.5 µm film) DB-210 capillary 
          column was used in this evaluation. 
          3.1.3 An electronic integrator or some other suitable means to 
          measure detector response. A waters 860 Networking Computer System was 
          used in this evaluation. 
          3.1.4 Volumetric flasks, pipets, and syringes for preparing 
          standards, making dilutions and performing injections. 
          3.1.5 Vials, 2-mL, and 4-mL, with PTFE-lined caps. 
          3.1.6 Mechanical shaker.  
        3.2 Reagents 
        
          3.2.1 Hydrogen, air and nitrogen, GC grade. 
          3.2.2 Dimethoate. A 99% pure standard from EPA was used in this 
          evaluation. 
          3.2.3 Toluene. The toluene used in this evaluation ws purchased 
          from Burdick and Jackson. 
          3.2.4 Tributyl phosphate. The tributyl phosphate was purchased from 
          Aldrich Chemical Company Inc. 
          3.2.5 Desorbing solution. If an internal standard is used, the 
          desorbing solution is prepared by adding 8 µL of tributyl phosphate to 
          100 mL of toluene. Otherwise, toluene is used.  
        3.3 Standard preparation 
        
         Prepare stock standards by adding either toluene or desorbing 
        solution (if an Internal standard is used) to preweighed amounts of 
        dimethoate. Prepare working range standards by dilution stock solutions 
        with either toluene or desorbing solution. Store stock and dilute 
        standards in a freezer. 
         3.4 Sample preparation
         
          3.4.1 Transfer the 13-mm glass fiber filter and the 270-mg sampling 
          section of the tube to a 4-mL vial. Place the fires foam plug and the 
          140-mg backup section in a separate vial. A small glass funnel can be 
          used to facilitate the transfer of the adsorbent. Discard the rear 
          foam plug. do not discard the glass sampling tube; it can be reused 
          after it has been cleaned by surfactant or solvent washing. 
          3.4.2 Add 2.0 mL of either toluene or desorbing solution (if an 
          internal standard is used) to each vial and seal with a Teflon-lined 
          cap. 
           3.4.3 Shake the vials on a mechanical shaker for half and hour. 
          3.4.4 If necessary, transfer aliquots of the samples to the vials 
          used in GC analysis. In this evaluation the samples were transferred 
          to 2-mL glass vials, sealed with PTFE-lined septa and loaded on the 
          automatic sampler.  
        3.5 Analysis 
        
          3.5.1 Instrument conditions 
          
            
              
              
                | Column: | 
                DB-210, 30 m × 0.32 mm i.d., 0.5 µm film |  
              
                | Injector temperature: | 
                200°C |  
              
                | Detector temperature: | 
                250°C |  
              
                | Column temperature: | 
                160°C |  
              
                | Head Pressure: | 
                7.5 psi |  
              
                | Temperature program: | 
                hold initial temp 1 min, increase temp at 
                  16°C/min to 200°C, hold final temp. 7 min |  
              
                |    | 
                   |  
              
                | FPD conditions: | 
                   |  
              
                | hydrogen flow rate: | 
                200 mL/min |  
              
                | air flow rate: | 
                100 mL/min |  
              
                | nitrogen flow rate: | 
                  30 mL/min |  
              
                |    | 
                   |  
              
                | Injection volume: | 
                1 µL |  
              
                | Split ratio: | 
                12.5:1 |  
              
                | Retention time: | 
                4.5 min (tributyl phosphate) |  
              
                |    | 
                7.5 min 
          (dmethoate) |     
          3.5.2 Chromatogram 
            
          Figure 2.  Chromatogram of Dimethoate at the 
          target level. 
          3.5.3 Measure detector response using a suitable method such as 
          electronic integration.  
        3.6 Interferences 
        3.6.1 Any collected compound which produces an FPD 
          response and has a similar retention time as dimethoate is a potential 
          interference. 
          3.6.2 GC conditions may generally be varied to circumvent 
          interferences. 
          3.6.3 Retention time on a single column is not proof of chemical 
          identity. Analysis by an alternate GC column, high performance liquid 
          chromatograph (HPLC) and confirmation by mass spectrometry are 
          additional means of identification.  
        3.7 Calculations 
        3.7.1 An internal standard (ISTD) calibration method is 
          used. A calibration curve may be constructed by plotting concentration 
          of analyte per mL versus ISTD-corrected response of standard 
          concentration (µg/mL) of dimethoate. Bracket the samples with prepared 
          analytical standards over a range of concentrations. 
          3.7.2 Determine the µg/mL of dimethoate in both sections of each 
          sample and blank from the calibration curve. If dimethoate is found on 
          the backup section, it is added to the amount found on the front 
          section. Blank corrections should be performed before adding the 
          results together. 
          3.7.3 Determine the air concentration by using the following 
          formula.
 
  
          
            
            
              | where: | 
              24.46 = molar volume (liters) at 101.3 kPa (760 
                mmHg) and 25°C |  
            
               | 
              229.3 = molecular weight of 
            dimethoate |   
            
           
  
        3.8 Safety precautions (analytical) 
        3.8.1 Avoid skin contact and air exposure to dimethoate. 
          3.8.2 Avoid skin contact with all solvents. 
          3.8.3 Wear safety glasses in laboratory.  
         - 
        
Recommendation for Further Study 
        This method should be fully validated. 
         - 
        
References 
        5.1  Burright, D.; Methods #62, "Chlorpyrifos, DDVP, 
        Diazinon, Malathion, and Parathion"; OSHA Analytical Laboratory, 
        unpublished, 1986. 
        5.2  "OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE, A Guide to their Recognition"; 
        U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; Public Health 
        Service, Public Health Service Publication No. 1097, U.S. Government 
        Printing Office: Washington, D.C., 1964; p 245. 
        5.3  Sax, N. Irving, Dangerous Properties of Industrial 
        Materials. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1981; p 608. 
        5.4  "Farm Chemicals Handbook"; Meister Publishing Co.: 
        Willoughby, OH, 1986; p C113. 
        5.5  Windholz, M., Budavari, S., Blumetti, RF., and 
        Otterbein, E., The Merck Index, 10th ed., Merck & CO., Inc., 
        Rahway, N.J., 1983; p469. 
          
   
   |