|
DIMETHOATE |
|
Method no.: |
PV2113 |
|
Control no.: |
T-PV2113-01-9206-CH |
|
Matrix: |
Air |
|
Target Concentration: |
0.2 mg/m3 (0.021 ppm) Skin (Arbitrary) |
|
Procedure: |
Samples are collected by drawing known volumes of air through
OSHA versatile sampler (OVS-2) tubes. Each tube contains a glass
fiber filter and two sections of XAD-2 adsorbent. Samples are
desorbed with toluene and analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) using
a flame photometric detector (FPD). |
|
Recommended air volume and sampling rate: |
480 L at 1.0 L/min |
|
Detection limit of the overall procedure (based on
the recommended air volume and the analytical detection limit): |
0.004 mg/m3 (0.43 ppb) |
|
Status of method: |
Partially evaluated method. This method has been partially
evaluated and is presented for information and trial use only. |
|
June 1992 (Final) |
Chemist: Ing-Fong Chan |
Organic Service Branch II OSHA Technical Center Salt
Lake City, Utah
- General Discussion
1.1 Background
1.1.1 History of procedure
This evaluation was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of
the OVS-2 tube as a sampling device for dimethoate. It follows the
procedure developed for several other organophosphorus pesticides
(Ref. 5.1).
1.1.2 Toxic effects (This Section is for information only and
should not be taken as the basis of OSHA policy).
The following paragraph is excerpted from the book OCCUPATIONAL
DISEASE, A Guide To Their Recognition (Ref. 5.2).
The organic phosphorus compounds act as irreversible inhibitors of
cholinesterase, thereby allowing the accumulation of large amounts of
acetylcholine. When a critical level of cholinesterase depletion is
reached, usually about 20% of normal, symptoms and signs of
acetylcholine accumulation poisoning become manifest. Symptoms may
include blurred vision, weakness, nausea, headache, abdominal cramps,
chest discomfort, and diarrhea. Signs may include miosis, muscle
twitching, salivation, sweating, tearing, cyanosis, convulsions, and
coma.
Besides being absorbed following inhalation or ingestion,
arganophosphorus pesticides are readily adsorbed through the intact
skin (ref. 5.2). When a particular pesticide has a low dermal
LD50, a skin notation should be added to the TLV or PEL.
Dimethoate has an acute oral LD50 of 152 mg/Kg and acute
dermal LD50 of 353 mg/Kg for rats (Ref. 5.3).
Due to these factors an arbitrary target concentration of 0.2
mg/m3, with a skin notation, ws chosen for dimethoate.
1.1.3 Potential workplace exposure
Domethoate is a systematic insecticide/acaricide used to spray
walls of farm buildings to control houseflies and in the control of
insects on ornamental plants, vegetables, fruits, and farm crops. no
data is available on the extent of work place exposure (Ref. 5.4).
1.1.4 Physical properties (Ref. 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5)
CAS number: |
60-51-5 |
IMIS number: |
D617 |
Molecular weight: |
229.3 |
Molecular formula: |
C5H12NO3PS2 |
|
|
Melting point: |
52 to 52.5°C at 101.3 kPa (760 mmHg) |
Solubility: |
very slightly soluble in water freely soluble
in most organic solvents, except saturated hydrocarbons. |
Chemical name: |
Dimethoate |
Synonyms: |
Phosphorodithioic acid, 0,0-Dimethyl
S-[2-(methylamino)-2-oxoethyl]ester; 0,0-Dimethyl
S-(N-Methylcarbamoylmethyl) Phosphorodithioate; Cygon; Fostion
MM; Perfekthion; Rogor; Roxion |
Appearance: |
white crystals |
Structure: |
|
1.2 Limit defining parameters
The detection limit of the analytical procedure, including a 12.5:1
split ratio, is 0.078 ng per injection. This is the amount of analyte
which will give a peak whose height is approximately five times the
baseline noise.
-
Sampling Procedure
2.1 Apparatus
2.1.1 A sample is collected by using a personal sampling
pump that can be calibrated to within ±5% of the recommended flow rate
with the sampling device in line.
2.1.2 OVS-2 tubes, which are specially made 13-mm o.d. They are
packed with a 140-mg backup section and a 270-mg sampling section of
cleaned XAD-2. The backup section is retained by two foam plugs and
the sampling section is between one foam plug and a 13-mm diameter
glass fiber filter. The glass fiber filter is held next to the
sampling section by a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) retainer. These
tubes are commercially available.
Figure 1. OVS-2 Sampling
Device
2.2 Reagents
No sampling reagents are required.
2.3 Sampling technique
2.3.1 Attach the small end of the OVS-2 sampling tube to
the sampling pump with flexible plastic tubing such that the large
front section of the sampling tube is exposed directly to the
atmosphere. Do not place any tubing in front of the sampler.
2.3.2 Attach the sampler vertically (large end down) in the
employee's breathing zone in such a manner that it does not impede
work performance.
2.3.3 After sampling for the appropriate time, remove the sampling
device and seal the tube with plastic end caps.
2.3.4 Wrap each sample end-to-end with an OSHA seal (Form 21).
2.3.5 Record the air volume for each sample and list any possible
interferences.
2.3.6 Submit at least one blank with each set of samples. Handle
the blank in the same manner as the other samples, except that no air
is drawn through it.
2.3.7 Submit any bulk samples for analysis in a separate container.
Do not ship bulk samples with the air samples.
2.4 Desorption efficiency
A 13-mm glass fiber filter and a amount of XAD-2 adsorbent equal to
the sampling section (270 mg) of an OVS-2 tube were placed in each of
nine 4-ml vials. They were divided into three groups of three vials.
These groups were liquid spiked respectively with 9.5, 19 and 38µL of
5.15 mg/mL solution of dimethoate in toluene by spiking the glass fiber
filter. These amounts represent 0.5×, 1.0×, and 2.0× the target
concentration. They were then sealed with PTFE-lined septa and allowed
to equilibrate overnight in a drawer at room temperature. The tubes,
along with a blank tube, were desorbed with 2.0 mL of the desorbing
solution, and analyzed as in section 3. The average desorption
efficiency was 97.1%. The results are listed in Table 2.4.
Table 2.4 Desorption Efficiency
|
Sample
# |
Amount Spiked, µg |
Amount Found,
µg |
% Recovered |
D1 |
48.9 |
46.8 |
95.7 |
D2 |
48.9 |
47.9 |
98.0 |
D3 |
48.9 |
50.2 |
102.3 |
|
|
Average
of 0.5× PEL= 98.7% |
|
|
|
|
D4 |
97.9 |
93.5 |
95.5 |
D5 |
97.9 |
92.8 |
94.8 |
D6 |
97.9 |
98.2 |
100.3 |
|
|
Average
of 1.0× PEL = 96.9% |
|
|
|
|
D7 |
195.7 |
186.1 |
95.1 |
D8 |
195.7 |
189.0 |
96.6 |
D9 |
195.7 |
187.3 |
95.7 |
D10 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Blank |
|
|
Average
of 2.0× PEL = 95.8% |
|
2.5 Retention efficiency
Four OVS-2 tubes were each liquid spiked with 19 µL (1× PEL) of 5.15
mg/mL solution of dimethoate in toluene by spiking the glass fiber
filter. These were allowed to equilibrate overnight in a drawer at room
temperature and then 480 L of humid air (~80% relative humidity) were
drawn through each tube at 1.0 L/min. The tubes, along with a blank
tube, were desorbed with 2.0 mL of desorbing solution, and analyzed as
in Section 3. No analyte was observed in backup sections. The results
are listed in Table 2.5.
Table 2.5 Retention Efficiency
|
Sample
# |
Amount Spiked, µg |
Amount Found,
µg |
% Recovered |
R1 |
97.9 |
92.3 |
94.3 |
R2 |
97.9 |
95.3 |
97.3 |
R3 |
97.9 |
95.2 |
97.2 |
R4 |
97.9 |
98.0 |
100.1 |
R5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
BLANK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average = 97.2% |
|
2.6 Sample storage
Eight OVS-2 tubes were each liquid spiked with 19 µL (1× PEL)of 5.15
mg/mL solution in toluene by spiking the glass fiber filter. These tubes
were allowed to equilibrate overnight in a drawer at room temperature
and then 480 L of humid air (~80% relative humidity) were drawn through
each tube at 1.0 L/min. The eight tubes were divided into two groups of
four tubes each. The fires group was stored in a drawer at ambient
temperature, the second group was stored in a freezer (-5°C). After
seven days they were extracted and analyzed as in Section 3. No analyte
was observed n backup sections. The results are given in Tables 2.6.1,
and 2.6.2.
Table 2.6.1 Ambient Storage
|
Days Stored |
Amount Spiked, µg |
Amount Found,
µg |
% Recovered |
7 |
97.9 |
94.1 |
96.1 |
7 |
97.9 |
96.3 |
98.4 |
7 |
97.9 |
97.2 |
99.3 |
7 |
97.9 |
97.0 |
99.0 |
7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
BLANK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average = 98.2% |
|
Table 2.6.2 Freezer Storage
|
Days Stored |
Amount Spiked, µg |
Amount Found,
µg |
% Recovered |
7 |
97.9 |
96.7 |
98.8 |
7 |
97.9 |
98.7 |
100.8 |
7 |
97.9 |
96.4 |
98.5 |
7 |
97.9 |
99.2 |
101.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average = 99.9% |
|
2.7 Recommended air volume and sampling rate
2.7.1 The recommended air volume is 480 L.
2.7.2 The recommended flow rate is 1.0 L/min.
2.8 Interferences (sampling)
It is not known if any compounds will interfere with the collection
of dimethoate. Any suspected interferences should be reported to the
laboratory with submitted samples.
2.9 Safety precautions (sampling)
2.9.1 Attach the sampling equipment in such a manner that it will
not interfere with work performance or employee safety.
2.9.2 Follow all safety practices that apply to the work area being
sampled.
-
Analytical Procedure
3.1 Apparatus
3.1.1 A GC equipped with an FPD. A Hewlett-Packard 5890A
GC (capillary equipped with both an FPD operating in the phosphorus
mode and a Hewlett-Packard 7673A Autosampler was used in this
evaluation.
3.1.2 A GC column capable of separating dimethoate from any
interferences. A 30 m × 0.32 mm i.d. (0.5 µm film) DB-210 capillary
column was used in this evaluation.
3.1.3 An electronic integrator or some other suitable means to
measure detector response. A waters 860 Networking Computer System was
used in this evaluation.
3.1.4 Volumetric flasks, pipets, and syringes for preparing
standards, making dilutions and performing injections.
3.1.5 Vials, 2-mL, and 4-mL, with PTFE-lined caps.
3.1.6 Mechanical shaker.
3.2 Reagents
3.2.1 Hydrogen, air and nitrogen, GC grade.
3.2.2 Dimethoate. A 99% pure standard from EPA was used in this
evaluation.
3.2.3 Toluene. The toluene used in this evaluation ws purchased
from Burdick and Jackson.
3.2.4 Tributyl phosphate. The tributyl phosphate was purchased from
Aldrich Chemical Company Inc.
3.2.5 Desorbing solution. If an internal standard is used, the
desorbing solution is prepared by adding 8 µL of tributyl phosphate to
100 mL of toluene. Otherwise, toluene is used.
3.3 Standard preparation
Prepare stock standards by adding either toluene or desorbing
solution (if an Internal standard is used) to preweighed amounts of
dimethoate. Prepare working range standards by dilution stock solutions
with either toluene or desorbing solution. Store stock and dilute
standards in a freezer.
3.4 Sample preparation
3.4.1 Transfer the 13-mm glass fiber filter and the 270-mg sampling
section of the tube to a 4-mL vial. Place the fires foam plug and the
140-mg backup section in a separate vial. A small glass funnel can be
used to facilitate the transfer of the adsorbent. Discard the rear
foam plug. do not discard the glass sampling tube; it can be reused
after it has been cleaned by surfactant or solvent washing.
3.4.2 Add 2.0 mL of either toluene or desorbing solution (if an
internal standard is used) to each vial and seal with a Teflon-lined
cap.
3.4.3 Shake the vials on a mechanical shaker for half and hour.
3.4.4 If necessary, transfer aliquots of the samples to the vials
used in GC analysis. In this evaluation the samples were transferred
to 2-mL glass vials, sealed with PTFE-lined septa and loaded on the
automatic sampler.
3.5 Analysis
3.5.1 Instrument conditions
Column: |
DB-210, 30 m × 0.32 mm i.d., 0.5 µm film |
Injector temperature: |
200°C |
Detector temperature: |
250°C |
Column temperature: |
160°C |
Head Pressure: |
7.5 psi |
Temperature program: |
hold initial temp 1 min, increase temp at
16°C/min to 200°C, hold final temp. 7 min |
|
|
FPD conditions: |
|
hydrogen flow rate: |
200 mL/min |
air flow rate: |
100 mL/min |
nitrogen flow rate: |
30 mL/min |
|
|
Injection volume: |
1 µL |
Split ratio: |
12.5:1 |
Retention time: |
4.5 min (tributyl phosphate) |
|
7.5 min
(dmethoate) |
3.5.2 Chromatogram
Figure 2. Chromatogram of Dimethoate at the
target level.
3.5.3 Measure detector response using a suitable method such as
electronic integration.
3.6 Interferences
3.6.1 Any collected compound which produces an FPD
response and has a similar retention time as dimethoate is a potential
interference.
3.6.2 GC conditions may generally be varied to circumvent
interferences.
3.6.3 Retention time on a single column is not proof of chemical
identity. Analysis by an alternate GC column, high performance liquid
chromatograph (HPLC) and confirmation by mass spectrometry are
additional means of identification.
3.7 Calculations
3.7.1 An internal standard (ISTD) calibration method is
used. A calibration curve may be constructed by plotting concentration
of analyte per mL versus ISTD-corrected response of standard
concentration (µg/mL) of dimethoate. Bracket the samples with prepared
analytical standards over a range of concentrations.
3.7.2 Determine the µg/mL of dimethoate in both sections of each
sample and blank from the calibration curve. If dimethoate is found on
the backup section, it is added to the amount found on the front
section. Blank corrections should be performed before adding the
results together.
3.7.3 Determine the air concentration by using the following
formula.
where: |
24.46 = molar volume (liters) at 101.3 kPa (760
mmHg) and 25°C |
|
229.3 = molecular weight of
dimethoate |
3.8 Safety precautions (analytical)
3.8.1 Avoid skin contact and air exposure to dimethoate.
3.8.2 Avoid skin contact with all solvents.
3.8.3 Wear safety glasses in laboratory.
-
Recommendation for Further Study
This method should be fully validated.
-
References
5.1 Burright, D.; Methods #62, "Chlorpyrifos, DDVP,
Diazinon, Malathion, and Parathion"; OSHA Analytical Laboratory,
unpublished, 1986.
5.2 "OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE, A Guide to their Recognition";
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; Public Health
Service, Public Health Service Publication No. 1097, U.S. Government
Printing Office: Washington, D.C., 1964; p 245.
5.3 Sax, N. Irving, Dangerous Properties of Industrial
Materials. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1981; p 608.
5.4 "Farm Chemicals Handbook"; Meister Publishing Co.:
Willoughby, OH, 1986; p C113.
5.5 Windholz, M., Budavari, S., Blumetti, RF., and
Otterbein, E., The Merck Index, 10th ed., Merck & CO., Inc.,
Rahway, N.J., 1983; p469.
|