1. General Discussion
1.1 Background
1.1.1 History of procedure
The OSHA PEL for
cyanogen is 10 ppm (20 mg/m3).
Direct collection
on various media was not attempted as cyanogen reacts with water to
form hydrogen cyanide and cyanate, and would react with any water
collected from the humidity in the air. The collection of the cyanogen
with a XAD-2 tube coated with 2-(hydroxymethyl)piperidine (2-HMP
XAD-2) was attempted and found to be successful. The cyanogen was
stabilized by forming a derivative, and showed good desorption
efficiencies, retention efficiencies, and storage.
1.1.2
Potential workplace exposure (Ref 5.1)
Workers are
exposed to cyanogen in chemical manufacturing. Cyanogen is used as a
fumigant, in welding and cutting heat-resistant metals, and as a
rocket and missile propellant.
1.1.3 Toxic Effects (This
section is for information purposes and should not be taken as the
basis for OSHA policy.) (Ref 5.1)
Chronic exposure to
cyanogen causes irritation to the respiratory tract and to exposed
skin surfaces. Cyanogen forms hydrocyanic acid and cyanate in vivo.
Exposure causes hoarseness, conjunctivitis, and edema of the eyelid;
further exposure causes hemorragic exudate of the bronchi and trachea,
followed by pulmonary edema, and death. In laboratory tests, exposure
to 100 ppm. for 2-3 hours was fatal to cats, and at 400 ppm for 2
hours was fatal to rabbits.
1.1.4 Physical properties
(Ref 5.1 and 5.2):
Structure: |
|
Synonyms: |
carbon nitride: dicyanogen; dicyan;
ethedinitride; nitriloacetonitrile; oxalic acid dinitrile;
oxalyl cyanide; oxalonitrile |
Molecular weight: |
52.04 |
Freezing point: |
-27.9°C |
Boiling point: |
-20.7°C |
Odor |
none up to 250 ppm, after that almond-like |
Molecular formula: |
C2N2 |
CAS: |
460-19-5 |
IMIS: |
0800 |
RTECS: |
27697 (GT1925000) |
DOT: |
UN 1026 |
1.2 Limit defining parameters
1.2.1 The detection limit of the analytical procedure is
0.1 µg. This is the smallest amount of cyanogen that could be detected
under normal operating conditions.
1.2.2 The overall
detection limit is 0.1 µg. This corresponds to 0.016 ppm based on the
1 mL desorption volume, and 3 liters (all ppm amounts in this study
are based on a 3-L air volume).
1.3 Advantages
1.3.1 The sampling procedure is convenient.
1.3.2 The analytical method is reproducible and
sensitive.
1.3.3 Reanalysis of samples is
possible.
1.3.4 It may be possible to analyze other
compounds at the same time.
1.3.5 Interferences may be
avoided by proper selection of column and GC parameters.
1.4 Disadvantages
None known.
2. Sampling procedure
2.1 Apparatus
2.1.1 A calibrated personal sampling pump, the flow of
which can be determined within ±5% at the recommended flow of 0.1
L/min sampling rate with the sampling tube in line.
2.1.2 Samples are collected using sampling tubes
containing with XAD-2 coated with 2-(hydroxymethyl)piperidine. The
tubes are 8 cm long and i.d. is 4 mm. and o.d. is 6 mm. The tube is
packed with a 150 mg front section and a 75 mg backup section of the
XAD-2 coated with 2-(hydroxymethyl) piperidine. There is a silanized
glass wool plug before and after each section.
2.2 Sampling technique
2.2.1 The ends of the sampling tubes are opened
immediately before sampling.
2.2.2 Connect the sampling tubes to the sampling pump
with flexible tubing.
2.2.3 Tubes should be placed in a vertical position to
minimize channeling, with the smaller section towards the pump.
2.2.4 Air being sampled should not pass through any hose
or tubing before entering the sampling tube.
2.2.5 Seal the sampling tubes with plastic caps
immediately after sampling. Seal each sample lengthwise with OSHA
Form-21 sealing tape.
2.2.6 With each batch of samples,
submit at least one blank tube from the same lot used for samples.
This tube should be subjected to exactly the same handling as the
samples (break ends, seal, & transport) except that no air is
drawn through it.
2.2.7 Transport the samples (and corresponding
paperwork) to the lab for analysis.
2.2.8 Bulks submitted for analysis must be shipped in a
separate container from the samples.
2.3 Desorption efficiency
Six tubes were spiked with cyanogen gas at each loading of
3.64 µg (0.57 ppm), 16.5 µg (2.58 ppm), 32.9 µg (5.15 ppm), and 64.0 µg
(10.0 ppm). They were compared to standards prepared by spiking cyanogen
into a solution of 15 mg/mL 2-(hydroxymethyl) piperidine in toluene.
Samples and standards were allowed to react overnight. The samples were
opened, each section placed into a separate 2 mL vial, desorbed with 1
mL of the desorbing solution, desorbed for 30 minutes with occasional
shaking, and were analyzed by GC-NPD. The overall average was 99.0%
recovered (Table 2.3).
Table 2.3
Desorption
Efficiency
|
%
Recovered |
Tube # |
0.05× PEL |
0.25× PEL |
0.5× PEL |
1× PEL |
|
3.64 µg |
16.5 µg |
32.9 µg |
64.0 µg |
|
1 |
99.3 |
97.9 |
94.4 |
96.2 |
2 |
98.6 |
99.1 |
101 |
97.9 |
3 |
103 |
100 |
102 |
98.2 |
4 |
97.4 |
95.8 |
100 |
101 |
5 |
98.8 |
101 |
100 |
98.2 |
6 |
100 |
99.9 |
99.9 |
95.5 |
average |
99.5 |
99 |
99.6 |
97.8 |
overall average |
99.0 |
|
|
standard deviation |
±2.09 |
|
|
|
2.4 Retention efficiency
Six tubes were spiked with 35 µL cyanogen gas, or 64.3 µg
(10.1 ppm) cyanogen, allowed to equilibrate overnight, and had 12 liters
humid air (93% RH) pulled through them. They were opened, desorbed, and
analyzed by GC-NPD. There was no cyanogen found on the backup
portions of the tubes (Table 2.4). The retention efficiency averaged
99.8%.
Table 2.4
Retention Efficiency
|
Tube # |
% Recovered |
% Recovered |
Total |
|
'A' |
'B' |
|
|
1 |
96.6 |
0.0 |
96.6 |
2 |
102 |
0.0 |
102 |
3 |
97.5 |
0.0 |
97.5 |
4 |
99.6 |
0.0 |
99.6 |
5 |
101 |
0.0 |
101 |
6 |
102 |
0.0 |
102 |
average |
|
|
99.8 |
|
2.5 Storage
Sampling tubes were spiked with
63.6 µg (9.96 ppm) cyanogen and stored at room temperature until opened
and analyzed. The recoveries averaged 98.6 % for the 13 days stored
(Table 2.5).
Table 2.5
Storage Study
|
Day |
% Recovered |
|
6 |
97.9 |
6 |
94.3 |
6 |
96.4 |
6 |
98.2 |
6 |
99.2 |
13 |
102 |
13 |
101 |
13 |
99.8 |
13 |
97.6 |
13 |
100 |
average |
98.6 |
|
2.6 Precision
The precision was calculated using
the area counts from six injections of each standard at concentrations
of 3.64 µg/mL, 16.5 µg/mL, 32.9 µg/mL, and 64.0 µg/mL. The pooled
coefficient of variance (Pooled CV) was 0.0257 (Table
2.6).
Table 2.6
Precision
Study
|
Injection |
3.64 |
16.5 |
32.9 |
64.0 |
Number |
µg/mL |
µg/mL |
µg/mL |
µg/mL |
|
1 |
129360 |
617890 |
1260600 |
2004500 |
2 |
130840 |
578030 |
1298100 |
2048300 |
3 |
127230 |
582110 |
1307300 |
1927600 |
4 |
124970 |
615870 |
1294900 |
1959700 |
5 |
132100 |
574430 |
1300200 |
1914100 |
6 |
127550 |
617730 |
1300700 |
1915500 |
Average |
128675 |
597577 |
1293533 |
1961617 |
Standard Deviation |
±2606 |
±21496 |
±16689 |
±54586 |
CV |
0.0203 |
0.0360 |
0.0130 |
0.0278 |
Pooled CV |
0.0257 |
|
|
|
|
where:
A(1),A(2),A(3),A(4) = # of injections at each
level
CV1,CV2,CV3,CV4 = coefficients at each level
2.7 Air volume and sampling rate studied
2.7.1 The air volume studied is 3 liters. Retention
efficiencies were studied at 12 liters with no loss of sample, so
larger air volumes can be taken.
2.7.2 The sampling rate studied is 0.2 liters per
minute.
2.8 Interferences
Suspected interferences should be listed on sample data
sheets.
2.9 Safety precautions
2.9.1 Sampling equipment should be placed on an employee
in a manner that does not interfere with work performance or safety.
2.9.2 Safety glasses should be worn at all times.
2.9.3 Follow all safety practices that apply to the
workplace being sampled.
3. Analytical method
3.1 Apparatus
3.1.1 Gas chromatograph equipped with
a
nitrogen-phosphorous detector.
3.1.2 GC column
capable of separating the analyte and an internal standard from any
interferences. The column used in this study was a 30-meter 0.5-µm df
SP2250 capillary column, 0.32 mm i.d.
3.1.3 An electronic integrator or some other suitable
method of measuring peak areas.
3.1.4 Two milliliter vials with Teflon-lined caps.
3.1.5 A 10-µL syringe or other convenient size for
sample injection.
3.1.6 Pipets for dispensing the
desorbing solution.
3.1.7 Gas tight syringe 25 µL or
other convenient size for preparing standards.
3.2 Reagents
3.2.1 Purified GC grade hydrogen, nitrogen, and
air.
3.2.2 Cyanogen 98% purity.
3.2.3 Toluene, Reagent grade.
3.2.4 2-(Hydroxymethyl) piperidine, Reagent grade.
3.2.5 Dimethyl formamide, Reagent grade.
3.2.6 Desorbing solution is 0.2 µL/mL dimethyl formamide
in toluene.
3.3 Sample preparation
3.3.1 Sample tubes are opened and the front and
back
section of each tube are placed in separate 2 mL vials.
3.3.2 Each section is desorbed with 1 mL of the
desorbing solution of 0.2 µL/mL dimethyl formamide in toluene.
3.3.3 The vials are sealed immediately and allowed to
desorb for 30 minutes with occasional shaking.
3.4 Standard preparation
3.4.1 Standards are prepared by spiking a known quantity
of cyanogen onto a 150 mg portion of the 2-HMP XAD-2.
3.4.2 Cyanogen gas was spiked onto the resin using a
gas-tight syringe. A spike of 35 µL corresponds to 64.0 µg cyanogen at
657 mmHg, 22°C, and a 98% purity gas. This is equal to 10.0 ppm based
on a 3-L air volume, or 2.5 ppm based on a 12-liter air volume.
3.4.3 A series of standards are prepared covering the
range from detection limit to the highest sample. The standards should
bracket the samples. At least five differing concentrations should be
made so that there are enough data points to plot a curve.
3.5 Analysis
3.5.1 Gas chromatograph conditions.
Flow rates (mL/min) |
Temperature (°C) |
Nitrogen (make-up): |
30 |
Injector: |
180 |
Hydrogen (carrier): |
1 |
Detector: |
250 |
Hydrogen (detector): |
2 |
Column: |
140 |
Air: |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Injection size: |
1µL |
|
|
Elution time: |
34.4 min |
|
Chromatogram: |
|
3.5.2 Peak areas are measured by an integrator or other
suitable means.
3.6 Interferences (analytical)
3.6.1 Any compound having the general retention time of
the analyte or the internal standard used is an interference. Possible
interferences should be listed on the sample data sheet. GC parameters
should be adjusted if necessary so these interferences will pose no
problems.
3.6.2 It was found that cyanogen chloride
formed the same derivative.
3.6.3 Retention time data on a single column is not
considered proof of chemical identity. Samples over the target
concentration should be confirmed by GC/Mass Spec or other suitable
means.
3.7 Calculations
3.7.1 A curve with area counts versus concentration is
calculated from the calibration standards.
3.7.2 The area counts for the samples are plotted with
the calibration curve to obtain the concentration of cyanogen in
solution.
3.7.3 To calculate the concentration of analyte in the
air sample the following formulas are used:
3.7.4 The above equations can be consolidated to form
the following formula. To calculate the ppm of analyte in the sample
based on a 10 liter air sample:
µg/mL |
= |
Concentration of analyte in sample or
standard |
24.46 |
= |
Molar volume (liters/mole) at 25°C and 760
mmHg. |
MW |
= |
Molecular weight (g/mole) |
DV |
= |
Desorption volume |
10 L |
= |
10 liter air sample |
DE |
= |
Desorption efficiency |
3.7.5 This calculation is done for each section of the
sampling tube and the results added together.
3.8 Safety precautions
3.8.1 All handling of solvents should be done in a hood.
3.8.2 Avoid skin contact with all solvents.
3.8.3 Wear safety glasses at all times.
4. Recommendations for further study
5.1 "Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and
Biological Exposure Indices", Fifth Edition, American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists Inc., Cincinnati, OH, 1986, p. 154.
5.2 Windholz, M., "The Merck Index", Tenth Edition, Merck
& Co., Rahway N.J., 1983, p. 385.