Thiophanate-methyl
Method number: |
PV2058 |
|
Matrix: |
Air |
|
Target Concentration: |
0.4 mg/m3 (arbitrary) There is no OSHA
permissible exposure level (PEL) or ACGIH threshold limit value
(TLV) for thiophanate-methyl. |
|
Procedure: |
Samples are collected by drawing known volumes of air through
glass fiber filters. Samples are extracted with acetonitrile and
analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using an
ultraviolet (UV) detector. |
|
Recommended air volume and sampling rate: |
240 L at 1.0 L/min |
|
Detection limit of the overall procedure (based on the
recommended air volume and the analytical detection limit): |
10 µg/m3 |
|
Status of method: |
Stopgap method. This method has been only partially evaluated
and is presented for information and trial use. |
|
Date: January 1989 (final) |
Chemist: Duane Lee |
Carcinogen And Pesticide Branch OSHA Analytical
Laboratory Salt Lake City, Utah
1. General Discussion
1.1. Background
1.1.1. History of procedure The OSHA Analytical Laboratory
received a set of air samples requesting the analysis of
thiophanate-methyl. The samples had been collected on
glass fiber filters with air volumes of about 240 liters. This
report describes the analytical method developed.
1.1.2. Toxic effects (This section is for information only and
should not be taken as the basis of OSHA policy.)
The acute oral LD50 in rats has been
reported to be 7500 mg/kg and 6640 mg/kg. (Ref. 5.1. and 5.2.)
1.1.3. Potential workplace exposure
Thiophanate-methyl has a broad spectrum of plant disease control
in vegetables, fruit, turf, soybeans, peanuts, almonds, celery (Ref
5.2.). No estimate of worker exposure to thiophanate-methyl could be
found.
1.1.4. Physical properties (Ref. 5.1. to 5.3.)
Molecular weight: |
342.42 |
Molecular formula: |
C12H14N
4O4S2 |
CAS #: |
23564-05-8 |
IMIS number: |
D347 |
Melting point: |
168°C with decomposition |
Solubility: |
soluble in acetone, methanol, chloroform,
acetonitrile; slightly soluble in other organics; insoluble in
water |
Chemical name: |
Dimethyl ((1,2-phenylene)
bis-(iminocarbonothioyl)} bis {carbamate} |
Synonyms: |
Cercobin-M, Mildothane, Topsin H,
Labilite |
Description: |
colorless crystalline solid |
UV scan: |
Figure 1. |
Structure: |
|
1.2. Limit defining parameters
The detection limit of the analytical procedure is 0.5 ng per
injection. This is the amount of analyte which will give a peak whose
height is approximately five times the baseline noise.
2. Sampling procedure
2.1. Apparatus
2.1.1. A personal sampling pump that can be calibrated to within
± 5% of the recommended flow rate with the sampling device in line.
2.1.2. Glass fiber filters, 37-mm diameter, Gelman
Type A, or equivalent.
2.1.3. Cassette filter holder for 37-mm filters,
Millipore M000037A0, or equivalent.
2.2. Reagents
No sampling reagents are required.
2.3. Sampling technique
2.3.1. Immediately before sampling, remove the plastic plugs
from the cassette.
2.3.2. Attach the cassette to the sampling pump with flexible
tubing.
2.3.3. Attach the cassette vertically in the employee's breathing
zone in such a manner that it does not impede work performance.
2.3.4. After sampling for the appropriate time, remove the
cassette and seal with plastic plugs.
2.3.5. Wrap each cassette end-to-end with an OSHA
seal (Form 21).
2.3.6. Record the air volume for each sample, and list any
possible interferences.
2.3.7. Submit at least one blank for each set of samples. Handle
the blank in the same manner as the samples, except no air is drawn
through it.
2.3.8. Submit bulk samples for analysis in a separate container.
2.4. Extraction efficiency
Twenty-four glass fiber filters were each liquid spiked with 40 µL
of a 2.442 mg/mL thiophanate-methyl standard. After drying, six of the
glass fiber filters were each extracted with 5 mL of acetonitrile,
shaken for 30 min and then analyzed as in section 3. The results are
listed in the following table.
Table 2.4. Extraction Efficiency
|
Amount |
Amount |
% |
Sample # |
Spiked, µg |
Found, µg |
Recovered |
Ex1 |
97.68 |
92.46 |
94.7 |
Ex2 |
97.68 |
91.93 |
94.1 |
Ex3 |
97.68 |
93.36 |
95.6 |
Ex4 |
97.68 |
87.78 |
89.9 |
Ex5 |
97.68 |
85.45 |
87.5 |
Ex6 |
97.68 |
96.95 |
99.3 |
|
|
|
Average = |
93.5 |
2.5. Retention efficiency
The remaining 18 glass fiber filters from above had 240 L of humid
air (~80% relative humidity) drawn though them. Six of the filters
were then each extracted with 5 mL of acetonitrile, shaken for 30 min
and then analyzed as in section 3. The results are listed in Table
2.5. The rest of the filters were kept, 6 in a drawer at ambient
temperature and 6 in a freezer, for storage studies.
Table 2.5. Retention Efficiency
|
Amount |
Amount |
% |
Sample # |
Spiked, µg |
Found, µg |
Recovered |
R1 |
97.68 |
95.01 |
97.3 |
R2 |
97.68 |
95.93 |
98.2 |
R3 |
97.68 |
99.89 |
102.3 |
R4 |
97.68 |
94.67 |
96.9 |
R5 |
97.68 |
99.18 |
101.5 |
R6 |
97.68 |
103.4 |
105.9 |
|
|
|
Average = |
100.4 |
2.6. Sample storage
After 5 days of storage; 6 samples, 3 from ambient storage and 3
from freezer storage, were each extracted with 5 mL of acetonitrile,
shaken for 30 min and then analyzed as in section 3. The remaining
samples were extracted and analyzed after 8 days of storage. The
results are given in the following Tables.
Table 2.6.1. Ambient Storage
Days |
Amount |
Amount |
% |
Stored |
Spiked, µg |
Found, µg |
Recovered |
5 |
97.68 |
97.63 |
99.9 |
5 |
97.68 |
96.05 |
98.3 |
5 |
97.68 |
104.51 |
107. |
8 |
97.68 |
98.16 |
100.5 |
8 |
97.68 |
96.32 |
98.6 |
8 |
97.68 |
89.55 |
91.7 |
|
|
|
Average of 5 days = |
101.7 |
|
|
Average of 8 days = |
96.9 |
Table 2.6.2 Freezer Storage
Days |
Amount |
Amount |
% |
Stored |
Spiked, µg |
Found, µg |
Recovered |
5 |
97.68 |
96.25 |
98.5 |
5 |
97.68 |
96.97 |
99.3 |
5 |
97.68 |
102.3 |
104.7 |
8 |
97.68 |
97.14 |
99.4 |
8 |
97.68 |
98.24 |
100.6 |
8 |
97.68 |
97.52 |
99.8 |
|
|
|
Average of 5 days = |
100.8 |
|
|
Average of 8 days = |
99.9 |
2.7. Recommended air volume and sampling rate
2.7.1. The recommended air volume is 240 L.
2.7.2. The recommended flow rate is 1.0 L/min.
2.8. Interferences (sampling)
It is not known if any compounds will interfere with the collection
of thiophanate-methyl. Any suspected interference should
be reported to the laboratory.
2.9. Safety precautions (sampling)
2.9.1. Attach the sampling equipment in such a manner that it
will not interfere with work performance or employee safety.
2.9.2. Follow all safety practices that apply to the work area
being sampled.
3. Analytical procedure
3.1. Apparatus
3.1.1. A balance capable of weighing to the nearest tenth of a
milligram. A Mettler HL52 balance was used in this evaluation.
3.1.2. A mechanical shaker.
3.1.3. An HPLC with a UV detector. A Hewlett Packard 1090 liquid
chromatograph with a diode array detector was used in this
evaluation.
3.1.4. An HPLC column capable of separating
thiophanate-methyl from any interferences. A 5 µm
Hypersil ODS 100 mm x 2.1 mm column was used in this evaluation.
3.1.5. An electronic integrator, or some other suitable means for
measuring detector response. The Hewlett-Packard (HP)
1090 Chem Station was used in this evaluation.
3.1.6. Volumetric flasks and pipets various sizes.
3.1.7. Scintillation vials, 20-mL.
3.1.8. Vials, 2-mL.
3.2. Reagents
3.2.1. Acetonitrile, HPLC grade.
3.2.2. Water, HPLC grade.
3.2.3. Thiophanate-methyl. An EPA standard # 6671
with a purity of 99.7% was used in this evaluation.
3.3. Standard preparation
Prepare thiophanate-methyl stock standards by weighing
10 to 14 mg of thiophanate-methyl. Transfer the
thiophanate-methyl to separate 10-mL
volumetric flasks, and add acetonitrile to the mark. Make working
range standards of 0.5 to 25 µg/mL by pipet dilutions of the stock
standards with acetonitrile. Store stock and dilute standards in a
freezer.
3.4. Sample preparation
3.4.1. Transfer the glass fiber filter to a scintillation vial.
3.4.2. Add 5.0 mL of acetonitrile to each vial and seal with a
Teflon-lined cap.
3.4.3. Shake the vials for 30 minutes on a mechanical shaker.
3.4.4. Transfer the sample to a 2-mL vial for use in
an HP autosampler
3.5. Analysis
3.5.1. Instrument conditions
Column: |
5 µm Hypersil ODS, 100 mm x 2.1 mm |
Oven temperature: |
40°C |
Mobile phase: |
30% acetonitrile |
|
70% water |
Flow: |
0.3 mL/min |
Wavelengths: |
266 nm and 208 nm |
Injection volume: |
1.0 µL |
Retention time: |
3.46 min |
3.5.2. Chromatogram (Figure 2.)
3.6. Interferences (analytical)
3.6.1. Any collected compound having a similar retention time to
that of thiophanate-methyl is an interference.
3.6.2. HPLC conditions may be varied to circumvent interferences.
3.6.3. Retention time alone on a single column is not proof of
chemical identity. Analysis by an alternate HPLC column, comparison
of wavelength responses or confirmation by mass spectrometry are
additional means of identification.
3.7. Calculations
3.7.1. Construct a calibration curve (Figure 3.) by plotting
detector response versus concentration (µg/mL) of
thiophanate-methyl.
3.7.2. Determine the µg/mL of thiophanate-methyl in
each sample and blank from the calibration curve.
3.7.3. Blank correct the sample by subtracting the µg/mL found in
the blank from the µg/mL found in the sample.
3.7.4. Determine the air concentration by using the following
formula.
mg/m3 = |
(µg/mL in sample) × (extraction
volume, mL)
(air volume, L) × (extraction efficiency,
decimal) |
3.8. Safety precautions (analytical)
3.8.1. Avoid skin contact and air exposure to
thiophanate-methyl.
3.8.2. Avoid skin contact with all solvents.
3.8.3. Wear safety glasses at all times.
4. Recommendation for further study
This method should be fully validated.
Figure 1. UV Scan of Thiophanate-methyl
Figure 2. Chromatogram of
Thiophanate-methyl
Figure 3. Calibration Curve
5. References
5.1. Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances
1985-86 Edition; U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services: Cincinnati, OH, 1987; DHHS(NIOSH) Publication No.
87-114, p 313.
5.2. Farm Chemicals Handbook; Berg, Gordon L. Ed.; Meister:
Willoughby, Ohio, 1986; p C231.
5.3. Merck Index, 10th ed.; Windholz, Martha Ed.; Merck:
Rathway, N.J., 1983; pp 1339-1340.
|