2-METHOXYPHENOL 3-METHOXYPHENOL 4-METHOXYPHENOL
Method number: |
PV2039 |
|
Matrix: |
Air |
|
Target concentration: |
5 mg/m3 OSHA 1989 TWA PEL for
4-methoxyphenol This has been vacated. |
|
Procedure: |
Samples are collected by drawing a known volume of air through
an XAD-7 tube. Samples are desorbed with methanol and
analyzed by gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector
(GC-FID). |
|
Air volume and sampling rate studied: |
20 liters at 0.2 Lpm |
|
Status of method: |
Stopgap method. This method has been only partially evaluated
and is presented for information and trial use. |
|
Date: March, 1992 Revised: March, 1994 |
Chemist: Mary E.
Eide |
Organic Service Branch I OSHA Salt Lake Technical
Center Salt Lake City, Utah
1. General Discussion
1.1. Background
1.1.1. History of procedure
The OSHA Technical Center has received many requests for a
sampling and analytical procedure for the isomers of methoxyphenol.
OSHA promulgated an exposure standard for
4-methoxyphenol in January, 1989, at a level of 5
mg/m3. OSHA method 32 recommends
collection of phenol and cresol on XAD-7 tubes and
desorption with methanol (Ref. 5.1.). This procedure was found to
give good recoveries for the methoxyphenol isomers, in desorption,
retention, and storage studies.
1.1.2. Potential workplace exposure (Ref. 5.2. and 5.3.)
Methoxyphenols are used in the manufacture of antioxidants, and
pharmaceuticals. 2-Methoxyphenol is used as an
expectorant, and in synthetic flavors. 4-Methoxyphenol
is used to manufacture plasticizers, dyestuffs, stabilizer for
chlorinated hydrocarbons and ethyl cellulose, inhibitor for acrylic
monomers and acrylonitriles, and as an UV inhibitor.
1.1.3. Toxic Effects (This section is for information purposes
and should not be taken as the basis for OSHA policy.)(Ref. 5.2.,
5.3., and 5.4.)
Methoxyphenols are eye, skin, and mucous membrane irritants.
Ingestion produces burning in the mouth and throat, followed by
gastrointestinal distress, tremors, and collapse.
3-Methoxyphenol has also been reported to cause
menstrual cycle changes or disorders.
1.1.4. Physical properties
2-Methoxyphenol (Ref. 5.2):
Compound: |
|
Synonyms: |
Guaiacol; o-Methoxyphenol; Methyl
catechol; Anastil; 1-Hydroxy-2-methoxybenzene;
Pyrocatechol methyl ether; o-Hydroxyanisole;
Pyroguaiac acid |
Molecular weight: |
124.15 |
Melting point: |
28°C |
Boiling point: |
205°C |
Flash point: |
82.2°C (180°F) (open cup) |
Odor: |
sweet phenolic |
Color: |
white to pale yellow crystals |
Molecular formula: |
C7H8O2 |
CAS: |
90-05-1 |
IMIS: |
M168 |
RTECS: |
56973; SL7525000 |
3-Methoxyphenol (Ref. 5.5):
Compound: |
|
Synonyms: |
Resorcinol monomethyl ether;
m-Methoxyphenol;
m-Hydroxyanisole |
Molecular weight: |
124.15 |
Density: |
1.131 |
Melting point: |
<-17°C |
Boiling point: |
244°C |
Flash point: |
82.2°C (180°F)(open cup) |
Odor: |
sweet phenolic |
Color: |
amber liquid |
Molecular formula: |
C7H8O2 |
CAS: |
150-19-6 |
IMIS: |
M169 |
RTECS: |
56972; SL7524000 |
4-Methoxyphenol (Ref. 5.3.):
Compound: |
|
Synonyms: |
r-Methoxyphenol;
Hydroquinone monomethyl ether; r-Hydroxyanisole |
Molecular weight: |
124.15 |
Melting point: |
52.5°C |
Boiling point: |
243°C |
Flash point: |
124°C (257°)(closed cup) |
Odor: |
sweet phenolic |
Color: |
white waxy solid |
Molecular formula: |
C7H8O2 |
CAS: |
150-76-5 |
IMIS: |
M329 |
RTECS: |
56974;
SL7700000 |
1.2. Limit defining parameters
1.2.1. The detection limit of the analytical procedure for each
isomer of methoxyphenol is 1 µg. This is the smallest amount that
could be detected under normal operating conditions.
1.2.2. The overall detection limit for each isomer of
methoxyphenol is 0.05 mg/m3. (All ppm
amounts in this study are based on a 20 L air volume.)
1.3. Advantages
1.3.1. The sampling procedure is convenient.
1.3.2. The analytical method is reproducible and sensitive.
1.3.3. Reanalysis of samples is possible.
1.3.4. It may be possible to analyze other compounds at the same
time.
1.3.5. Interferences may be avoided by proper selection of column
and GC parameters.
1.4. Disadvantages
none known
2. Sampling procedure
2.1. Apparatus
2.1.1. A calibrated personal sampling pump, the flow of which can
be determined within ±5% at the recommended flow.
2.1.2. XAD-7 tubes containing 15/50 mesh
XAD-7 with a 100 mg adsorbing section with a 50 mg
backup section separated by a silanized glass wool plug, with a
silanized glass wool plug before and after the adsorbing sections.
The ends are flame sealed and the glass tube containing the
adsorbent is 8 cm long, with a 8 mm 0.D. and 6 mm I.D., SKC tubes or
equivalent.
2.2. Sampling technique
2.2.1. Open the ends of the XAD-7 tube immediately
before sampling.
2.2.2. Connect the XAD-7 tube to the sampling pump
with flexible tubing.
2.2.3. Place the tubes in a vertical position to minimize
channeling, with the smaller section towards the pump.
2.2.4. Air being sampled should not pass through any hose or
tubing before entering the XAD-7 tube.
2.2.5. Seal the XAD-7 tube with plastic caps
immediately after sampling. Seal each sample lengthwise with OSHA
Form-21 sealing tape.
2.2.6. With each batch of samples, submit at least one blank tube
from the same lot used for samples. This tube should be subjected to
exactly the same handling as the samples (break ends, seal, &
transport) except that no air is drawn through it.
2.2.7. Transport the samples (and corresponding paperwork) to the
lab for analysis.
2.2.8. Bulks submitted for analysis must be shipped in a separate
container from other samples.
2.3. Desorption efficiency
Six tubes were spiked at each loading of 10 µg
(0.5mg/m3), 50 µg (2.5
mg/m3), and 100 µg (5.0
mg/m3) for each methoxyphenol,
approximately. They were allowed to equilibrate overnight at room
temperature. They were opened, each section placed into a separate 2
mL vial, desorbed with 1 mL of the desorbing solution for 30 minutes
with occasional shaking, and analyzed by GC-FID. The
overall average was 99.7% for 2-methoxyphenol, 99.9% for
3-methoxyphenol, and 99.1% for
4-methoxyphenol.(Tables 1, 2, and 3)
Table 1 2-Methoxyphenol Desorption
Efficiency
|
Tube# |
|
% Recovered |
|
|
10.1 µg |
50.5 µg |
101 µg |
|
1 |
100 |
99.5 |
102 |
2 |
101 |
98.7 |
101 |
3 |
102 |
102 |
99.1 |
4 |
97.5 |
95.9 |
99.8 |
5 |
102 |
100 |
99.8 |
6 |
101 |
96.4 |
97.6 |
average |
101 |
98.8 |
99.9 |
overall average |
99.7 |
|
standard deviation |
± 1.92 |
|
|
Table 2 3-Methoxyphenol Desorption
Efficiency
|
Tube# |
|
% Recovered |
|
|
11.0 µg |
55.0 µg |
110 µg |
|
1 |
100 |
97.6 |
101 |
2 |
98.6 |
97.9 |
101 |
3 |
97.4 |
98.7 |
100 |
4 |
103 |
98.4 |
102 |
5 |
102 |
101 |
102 |
6 |
99.2 |
96.9 |
101 |
average |
100 |
98.4 |
101 |
overall average |
99.9 |
|
standard deviation |
± 1.85 |
|
|
Table 3 4-Methoxyphenol Desorption
Efficiency
|
Tube# |
|
% Recovered |
|
|
10.2 µg |
51.0 µg |
102 µg |
|
1 |
98.6 |
97.9 |
99.4 |
2 |
96.3 |
97.8 |
99.6 |
3 |
98.7 |
97.0 |
99.3 |
4 |
102 |
98.0 |
101 |
5 |
99.9 |
102 |
99.4 |
6 |
101 |
97.4 |
98.5 |
average |
99.4 |
98.4 |
99.5 |
overall average |
99.1 |
|
standard deviation |
± 1.63 |
|
|
2.4. Retention efficiency
Six tubes were spiked with 101 µg (5.05
mg/m3) 2-methoxyphenol, 110 µg
(5.50 mg/m3) 3-methoxyphenol,
and 102 µg (5.10 mg/m3)
4-methoxyphenol, allowed to equilibrate overnight, and
then 20 liters humid air (91% RH) were pulled through them. They were
opened, desorbed, and analyzed by GC-FID. The retention
efficiency averaged 99.8% for 2-methoxyphenol, 99.5% for
3-methoxyphenol, and 99.1% for
4-methoxyphenol. There was little or no methoxyphenol
found on the backup portions of the tubes. (Tables 4, 5, and 6)
Table 4 2-Methoxyphenol Retention
Efficiency (101 µg spiked)
|
Tube # |
% Recovered |
% Recovered |
Total |
|
'A' |
'B' |
|
|
1 |
98.9 |
0.7 |
99.6 |
2 |
98.1 |
0.0 |
98.1 |
3 |
100 |
0.0 |
100 |
4 |
99.1 |
0.0 |
99.1 |
5 |
102 |
0.0 |
102 |
6 |
100 |
0.0 |
100 |
|
average |
99.8 |
|
Table 5 3-Methoxyphenol Retention
Efficiency (110 µg spiked)
|
Tube # |
% Recovered |
% Recovered |
Total |
|
'A' |
'B' |
|
|
1 |
99.7 |
0.0 |
99.7 |
2 |
100 |
0.0 |
100 |
3 |
99.0 |
0.0 |
99.0 |
4 |
97.4 |
0.0 |
97.4 |
5 |
101 |
0.0 |
101 |
6 |
99.6 |
0.0 |
99.6 |
|
average |
99.5 |
|
Table 6 4-Methoxyphenol Retention
Efficiency (102 µg spiked)
|
Tube # |
% Recovered |
% Recovered |
Total |
|
'A' |
'B' |
|
|
1 |
98.1 |
0.0 |
98.1 |
2 |
98.2 |
0.0 |
98.2 |
3 |
101 |
0.0 |
101 |
4 |
98.3 |
0.0 |
98.3 |
5 |
100 |
0.0 |
100 |
6 |
98.8 |
0.0 |
98.8 |
|
average |
99.1 |
|
2.5. Storage
Six tubes were spiked with 101 µg (5.05
mg/m3) 2-methoxyphenol, 110 µg
(5.50 mg/m3) 3-methoxyphenol,
and 102 µg (5.10 mg/m3)
4-methoxyphenol. They were stored at room temperature
until opened and analyzed. The recoveries averaged 101% for
2-methoxyphenol, 100% for 3-methoxyphenol,
and 99.7% for 4-methoxyphenol for the 14 days stored.
(Tables 7, 8, and 9)
Table 7 2-Methoxyphenol Storage
Study (101 µg spiked)
|
Day |
% Recovered |
|
7 |
102 |
7 |
100 |
7 |
100 |
14 |
103 |
14 |
99.8 |
14 |
99.2 |
average |
101 |
|
Table 8 3-Methoxyphenol Storage
Study (110 µg spiked)
|
Day |
% Recovered |
|
7 |
101 |
7 |
99.2 |
7 |
99.8 |
14 |
102 |
14 |
100 |
14 |
100 |
average |
100 |
|
Table 9 4-Methoxyphenol Storage
Study (102 µg spiked)
|
Day |
% Recovered |
|
7 |
100 |
7 |
98.8 |
7 |
99.2 |
14 |
101 |
14 |
99.5 |
14 |
99.7 |
average |
99.7 |
|
2.6. Precision
The precision was calculated using the area counts from six
injections of each standard at concentrations of approximately 10, 50,
100, and 200 µg/mL of each methoxyphenol in the desorbing solution.
The pooled coefficient of variation was 0.0226 for
2-methoxyphenol, 0.0180 for 3-methoxyphenol,
and 0.0147 for 4-methoxyphenol.(Tables 10, 11, and 12)
Table 10 Precision Study
2-Methoxyphenol
|
Injection |
|
Number |
10.1µg/mL |
50.5µg/mL |
101µg/mL |
202µg/mL |
|
1 |
1605 |
8858 |
19242 |
40786 |
2 |
1691 |
8829 |
19596 |
40180 |
3 |
1567 |
8796 |
19406 |
39842 |
4 |
1543 |
8712 |
18530 |
40642 |
5 |
1553 |
8646 |
19569 |
40656 |
6 |
1609 |
8581 |
18602 |
39863 |
Average |
1595 |
8737 |
19158 |
40328 |
Standard |
|
Deviation |
±54.3 |
109 |
476 |
422 |
CV |
0.0340 |
0.0125 |
0.0248 |
0.0105 |
Pooled CV |
0.0226 |
|
|
Table 11 Precision Study
3-Methoxyphenol
|
Injection |
|
Number |
11.0µg/mL |
55.0µg/mL |
110µg/mL |
220µg/mL |
|
1 |
2011 |
9931 |
20670 |
42296 |
2 |
2024 |
9590 |
20444 |
42539 |
3 |
1933 |
9993 |
20071 |
42241 |
4 |
1873 |
9735 |
20468 |
42104 |
5 |
1966 |
9675 |
20586 |
42341 |
6 |
1968 |
9548 |
20126 |
42090 |
Average |
1963 |
9745 |
20394 |
42269 |
Standard |
|
Deviation |
±54.9 |
181 |
244 |
167 |
CV |
0.0280 |
0.0186 |
0.0120 |
0.00395 |
Pooled CV |
0.0180 |
|
|
Table 12 Precision Study
4-Methoxyphenol
|
Injection |
|
Number |
10.2µg/mL |
51.0µg/mL |
102µg/mL |
204µg/mL |
|
1 |
1982 |
10178 |
21314 |
42133 |
2 |
2032 |
10059 |
20806 |
43044 |
3 |
1983 |
10270 |
21214 |
42404 |
4 |
1968 |
10307 |
20503 |
42328 |
5 |
2043 |
10153 |
20814 |
42527 |
6 |
2061 |
10470 |
20609 |
42806 |
Average |
2012 |
10240 |
20877 |
42540 |
Standard |
|
Deviation |
±38.6 |
143 |
324 |
333 |
CV |
0.0192 |
0.0140 |
0.0155 |
0.00783 |
Pooled CV |
0.0147 |
|
|
where:
A(1), A(2),A(3),A(4) = # of injections at each
level CVl, CV2, CV3, CV4 = Coefficients at each level
2.7. Air volume and sampling rate studied
2.7.1. The air volume studied is 20 liters.
2.7.2. The sampling rate studied is 0.2 liters per minute.
2.8.Interferences
Suspected interferences should be listed on sample data sheets.
2.9. Safety precautions
2.9.1. Sampling equipment should be placed on an employee in a
manner that does not interfere with work performance or safety.
2.9.2. Safety glasses should be worn at all times.
2.9.3. Follow all safety practices that apply to the workplace
being sampled.
3. Analytical method
3.1. Apparatus
3.1.1. Gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization
detector. A HP 5890 gas chromatograph was used in this study.
3.1.2. GC column capable of separating the analyte and an
internal standard from any interferences. The column used in this
study was a 30 meter DB-225 capillary column, 0.25 µ
d.f., 0.32 mm I.D. An alternate column is a 60 meter DB-1 capillary
column, 1.0 µ d.f., 0.32 mm I.D.
3.1.3. An electronic integrator or some other suitable method of
measuring peak areas.
3.1.4. Two milliliter vials with Teflon-lined caps.
3.1.5. A 10 µL syringe or other convenient size for sample
injection.
3.1.6. Pipets for dispensing the desorbing solution. The Glenco 1
mL dispenser was used in this method.
3.1.7. Volumetric flasks - 5 mL and other convenient sizes for
preparing standards.
3.2 Reagents
3.2.1. Purified GC grade nitrogen, hydrogen, and air.
3.2.2. 2-Methoxyphenol, Reagent grade
3.2.3. 3-Methoxyphenol, Reagent grade
3.2.4. 4-Methoxyphenol, Reagent grade
3.2.5. Methanol, HPLC grade
3.2.6. Dimethyl formamide, Reagent grade
3.2.7. Desorbing solution is methanol with 1 µL/mL dimethyl
formamide used as internal standard.
3.3. Sample preparation
3.3.1. Sample tubes are opened and the front and back section of
each tube are placed in separate 2 mL vials, and the front glass
wool was included in the vial with the front section.
3.3.2. Each section is desorbed with 1 mL of the desorbing
solution.
3.3.3. The vials are sealed immediately and allowed to desorb for
30 minutes with occasional shaking.
3.4. Standard preparation
3.4.1. Standards are prepared by diluting a known quantity of
each isomer of methoxyphenol.
3.4.2. At least two separate stock standards should be made.
Dilutions of the stock standards are prepared covering the
concentrations in the samples. The analytical standards used in this
study ranged from 1 to 110 µg/mL of each isomer of methoxyphenol in
the desorbing solution.
3.5. Analysis
3.5.1.Gas chromatograph conditions for DB-225
capillary column.
Flow rates (mL/min) |
Temperature (°C) |
Nitrogen(makeup) |
:30 |
Injector |
:240 |
Hydrogen (carrier) |
:1.5 |
Detector |
:240 |
Air |
:450 |
Column |
:100°-1 min |
Hydrogen(detector) |
:30 |
|
5°C/min-140°C |
Injection size |
:1 µL |
|
Elution time |
:4.554, 11.455, and 12.175 min |
Chromatogram |
:(See Figure 1) |
3.5.2. Gas chromatograph conditions for DB-1capillary column.
Flow rates (mL/min) |
Temperature (°C) |
Nitrogen(makeup) |
:30 |
Injector |
:240 |
Hydrogen (carrier) |
:1.5 |
Detector |
:240 |
Air |
:450 |
Column |
:80°-0 min |
Hydrogen(detector) |
:30 |
|
10°C/min-160°C |
Injection size |
:1 µL |
|
Elution time |
:12.180, 15.328, and 15.768 min |
Chromatogram |
:(See Figure 2) |
3.5.3. Peak areas are measured by an integrator or other suitable
means.
3.6. Interferences (analytical)
3.6.1. Any compound having the general retention time of the
analyte or the internal standard used is an interference. Possible
interferences should be listed on the sample data sheet. GC
parameters should be adjusted if necessary so these interferences
will pose no problems.
3.6.2. Retention time data on a single column is not considered
proof of chemical identity. Samples over the target concentration
should be confirmed by GC/Mass Spec or other suitable means.
3.7. Calculations
3.7.1. A curve with area counts versus concentration is
calculated from the calibration standards.
3.7.2. The area counts for the samples are plotted with the
calibration curve to obtain the concentration of methoxyphenol in
solution.
3.7.3. To calculate the concentration of analyte in the air
sample the following formulas are used:
(µg/m)(desorption volume)
(desorption efficiency) |
= mass of analyte in
sample |
(mass of analyte in sample)
molecular weight |
= number of moles of
analyte |
(µg)
(L) |
× |
(mg)
(1000 µg) |
× |
(1000 L)
(m3) |
= mg/m3 of
analyte |
3.7.4. The above equations can be consolidated to form the
following formula. To calculate the mg/m3
of analyte in the sample based on a 20 liter air sample:
(µg/mL)(DV)
(20 L)(DE) |
× |
(mg)
(1000 µg) |
× |
(1000 L)
(m3) |
= mg/m3 of
analyte |
µg/mL |
= |
concentration of analyte in sample or standard |
DV |
= |
Desorption volume |
20 L |
= |
20 liter air sample |
DE |
= |
Desorption efficiency |
3.7.5. This calculation is done for each section of the sampling
tube and the results added together.
3.8. Safety precautions
3.8.1. All handling of solvents should be done in a hood.
3.8.2. Avoid skin contact with all chemicals.
3.8.3. Wear safety glasses, gloves and a lab coat at all times.
4. Recommendations for further study
Collection study should be performed.
Figure 1. An analytical standard of 101 µg/mL
2-methoxyphenol, 110 µg/mL 3-methoxyphenol,
and 102 µg/mL 4-methoxyphenol in methanol with 1 µL/mL
dimethyl formamide internal standard, analyzed using a
DB-225 capillary column.
Figure 2. An analytical standard of 101 µg/mL
2-methoxyphenol,110 µg/mL 3-methoxyphenol,
and 102 µg/mL 4-methoxyphenol in methanol with 1 µL/mL
dimethyl formamide internal standard, analyzed using a
DB-1 capillary column.
5. References
5.1. Cummins, K., Method 32, "Phenol and Cresol", Organic Methods
Evaluation Branch, OSHA Salt Lake Technical Center, 1986.
5.2. Windholz, M., "The Merck Index", Eleventh Edition, Merck &
Co., Rahway N.J., 1989, p. 715.
5.3. Sax, N., Lewis, R., "Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary",
Eleventh Edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 1987, p. 620.
5.4. "Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological
Exposure Indices", Fifth Edition, American Conference of Governmental
Industrial Hygienists Inc., Cincinnati, OH, 1986, p. 367.
5.5. Weast, R.C., "Handbook of Chemistry and Physics", 67th
Edition, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton FL, 1986, p.C244.
|