OSHA banner
Technical Links > Sampling & Analytical Methods > Index
 DOL logo

XYLENES (o-, m-, p-isomers)
ETHYLBENZENE


Method number: 1002
 
Target concentration:
  Xylenes: 100 ppm (435 mg/m3)
  Ethylbenzene: 17 ppm (73 mg/m3)
 
OSHA PEL:
  Xylenes: 100 ppm (435 mg/m3) (TWA)
  Ethylbenzene: 100 ppm (435 mg/m3) (TWA)
 
ACGIH TLV:
  Xylene: 100 ppm (TWA)
150 ppm (STEL/C)
  Ethylbenzene: 100 ppm (TWA)
125 ppm (STEL/C)
 
Procedure: Active samples are collected by drawing workplace air through coconut shell charcoal sampling tubes with personal sampling pumps. Diffusive samples are collected by exposing SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers to workplace air. Samples are extracted with carbon disulfide and analyzed by GC using a flame ionization detector.
 
Recommended sampling time and sampling rate:
Charcoal tubes: 240 min at 50 mL/min
SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers: 240 min
 

Reliable quantitation limit
(RQL) and Standard error
of estimate (SEE):

xylenes
ethylbenzene
RQL SEE RQL SEE
(ppb) (µg/m3) (%) (ppb) (µg/m3) (%)

charcoal tubes
SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers
20.6
194.1
89.3
842.7
5.5 
9.3*
8.3
72.8
35.9
316.0
5.4 
9.4*

*For samples when sampling site pressure and temperature are known. See Section 4.4.2 for applicable SEEs when either or both of these values are unknown.
 
Special requirement: Sampling site temperature and barometric pressure (station pressure) must be reported when diffusive samplers (such as SKC 575-002) are used to sample workplace air.
 
Status of method: Evaluated method. This method has been subjected to the established evaluation procedures of the Methods Development Team.
 
August 1999 Warren Hendricks



Methods Development Team
Industrial Hygiene Chemistry Division
OSHA Salt Lake Technical Center
Salt Lake City UT 84115-1802




1. General Discussion

    1.1 Background

      1.1.1 History

      Xylenes is a collective term for a mixture of m-, o-, and p- isomers of xylene. These isomers differ only in placement of two methyl groups on a benzene ring. Technical and commercial grades of xylenes often contain substantial amounts of ethylbenzene (10-50%), and perhaps minor amounts of other solvents as well. Mixtures of xylenes and ethylbenzene are occasionally termed mixed xylenes.1, 2

      Most occupational exposure to xylenes also results in exposure to ethylbenzene because technical and commercial grades of xylenes are often used by industry. Therefore, test atmospheres used in this work were prepared with a commercial source of xylenes to simulate workplace environment. This source of xylenes contained 43% m-xylene, 20% o-xylene, 19% p-xylene, and 15% ethylbenzene. Xylenes target concentration in test atmospheres were approximately 100 ppm for the sum of the three isomers. These xylenes air concentrations resulted in approximately 17 ppm ethylbenzene because of its level in the commercial xylenes. Xylenes and ethylbenzene can be present in the workplace in any combination and level, and this method should be satisfactory to monitor exposures to xylenes, individual xylene isomers, and ethylbenzene. The method recommends charcoal tubes for active sampling, and SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers for diffusive sampling. Samples are extracted with carbon disulfide, and are analyzed by GC using a flame ionization detector.

      Determination of xylenes is well documented in the literature3, 4, and one may question why this work was necessary. SLTC has begun to develop sampling and analytical methods which permit the use of diffusive, as well as, active sampling. One criterion for selection of chemicals for this evaluation program is the number of sample requests. Analysis of xylenes is one of the most requested solvent determinations performed at SLTC.

      1.1.2 Toxic effects (This section is for information only and should not be taken as the basis of OSHA policy.)

      Xylenes

      There is no appreciable difference in the toxicological effects of the individual xylene isomers and those of mixed isomers. Xylenes are eye, skin, and mucous membrane irritants. They can cause narcosis at high levels. Xylenes can cause liver and kidney damage. There is little (if any) evidence for the carcinogenicity of xylenes in experimental animals. The ACGIH TLV-TWA was set at 100 ppm, and the STEL at 150 ppm, for mixed xylene isomers and for individual isomers. It was anticipated that irritant effects would be minimal, and that neither narcosis nor chronic injury would result from exposures at these levels.5

      Ethylbenzene

      Ethylbenzene is a skin and mucous membrane irritant. It has acute and possibly chronic central nervous system effects that include vertigo, unconsciousness, tremors, and changes in respiration. Animal experiments suggest that ethylbenzene causes damage to the liver, kidneys, and testes. It was the opinion of the ACGIH TLV Committee that no systemic effects would be expected at concentrations which produce skin and eye irritation. The ACGIH TLV-TWA was set at 100 ppm and the STEL at 125 ppm to prevent such irritation.6 ACGIH published in the 1998 TLVs and BEIs booklet7 a "Notice of Intended Changes" to add the A3 notation to ethylbenzene. A3 is defined as "Confirmed Animal Carcinogen with Unknown Relevance to Humans".

      1.1.3 Workplace exposure

      The main source of mixed xylenes since World War II has been reformed petroleum fractions. Earlier, xylenes were produced from coal. Coal may again become an important source as the large coal reserves in the United States are developed for petrochemical uses.8 U.S. production of xylenes in 1995 was 9.4 billion pounds, and that for ethylbenzene was 13.7 billion pounds.9

      Most mixed xylenes are used to blend gasoline. Mixed xylenes are also used in the paint and coatings industry. m-Xylene is used to produce isophthalic acid, which is used in polyesters; o-xylene is used to produce phthalic anhyride, which is used in plasticizers; p-xylene is used to produce terephthalic acid and dimethyl terephtalate, both of which are used to produce polyesters. o-Xylene and p-xylene are used in vitamin and pharmaceutical synthesis, and to produce insecticides. Ethylbenzene is used to produce styrene.10, 11

      1.1.4 Physical properties (12 unless otherwise noted)


      xylenes m-xylene o-xylene p-xylene ethylbenzene

      CAS number13 1330-20-714 108-38-3 95-47-6 106-42-3 100-41-4
      IMIS number15 2590 1080
      molecular weight16 106.17 106.17 106.17 106.17 106.17
      boiling point (°C) 137-145 138.8 144 138.5 136.19
      melting point (°C) -47.4 -25 13.2 -95.0117
      density (°C) about 0.86 0.868 (15) 0.880 (20/4) 0.861 (20) 0.867 (20)
      molecular formula C8H10 C8H10 C8H10 C8H10 C8H10
      flash point (°F) 81-115 85 115 81 59
      vapor pressure
          (kPa, (°C))18, 19
      1.1 (25) 0.9 (25) 1.2 (25) 0.9 (20)

      Xylenes (dimethylbenzene, xylol) are soluble in alcohol and ether, but insoluble in water. Each of the mixed xylenes is a clear, colorless liquid at room temperature, however, p-xylene forms crystals at a relatively high temperature. The xylene isomers: m-xylene (1,3-dimethylbenzene), o-xylene (1,2-dimethylbenzene), and p-xylene (1,4-dimethylbenzene) are soluble in alcohol and ether; but they are insoluble in water. Ethylbenzene (phenylethane) is soluble in alcohol, benzene, carbon tetrachloride, and ether; it is but almost insoluble in water.20

      Structural formulas:

      m-xylne

      m-xylene
      o-xylne

      o-xylene
      p-xylne

      p-xylene
      ethyl benzene

      ethyl benzene

This method was evaluated according to OSHA SLTC "Evaluation Guidelines for Air Sampling Methods Utilizing Chromatographic Analysis21. The Guidelines define analytical parameters and specify required laboratory tests, statistical calculations and acceptance criteria. The analyte concentrations throughout this method are based on the recommended sampling and analytical parameters. Air concentrations in ppm and ppb are referenced to 25 °C and 101.3 kPa (760 mmHg).


    1.2 Limit defining parameters

      1.2.1 Detection limit of the analytical procedure

      The detection limits of the analytical procedure (DLAP) are shown in Table 1.2.1. These are the amounts of analyte that will give detector responses significantly different from the response of a reagent blank. (Section 4.1)

      Table 1.2.1
      DLAP (pg per sample)

      xylenes m-xylene o-xylene p-xylene ethylbenzene

      14.5 2.1 8.4 14.0 5.7

      1.2.2 Detection limit of the overall procedure

      Charcoal tubes

      The detection limits of the overall procedure (DLOP) are shown in Table 1.2.2.1. These are the amounts of analyte spiked on the samplers that will give detector responses significantly different from the response of a sampler blank. (Section 4.2)

      Table 1.2.2.1
      DLOP for Charcoal Tubes

      analyte ng ppb µg/m3

      xylenes
      m-xylene
      o-xylene
      p-xylene
      ethylbenzene
      322
      159
      239
      100
      129
      6.2
      3.0
      4.6
      1.9
      2.5
      26.8
      13.2
      19.9
      8.3
      10.8



      SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      The detection limits of the overall procedure (DLOP) are shown in Table 1.2.2.2. These are the amounts of analyte spiked on the samplers that will give detector responses significantly different from the response of a sampler blank. (Section 4.2)

      Table 1.2.2.2
      DLOP for SKC 575-002
      Passive Samplers

      analyte ng ppb µg/m3

      xylenes
      m-xylene
      o-xylene
      p-xylene
      ethylbenzene
      847
      448
      325
      437
      315
      58.2
      31.1
      21.9
      30.1
      21.9
      252.8
      134.9
      95.0
      130.8
      94.9

      1.2.3 Reliable quantitation limit

      Charcoal tubes

      The reliable quantitation limits (RQL) are shown in Table 1.2.3.1. These are the amounts of analyte that will give detector responses that are considered the lower limits for precise quantitative measurements. (Section 4.2)

      Table 1.2.3.1
      RQL for Charcoal Tubes

      analyte ng ppb µg/m3

      xylenes
      m-xylene
      o-xylene
      p-xylene
      ethylbenzene
      1072
      531
      795
      334
      431
      20.6
      10.2
      15.3
      6.4
      8.3
      89.3
      44.2
      66.2
      27.8
      35.9



      SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      The reliable quantitation limits (RQL) are shown in Table 1.2.3.2. These are the amounts of analyte that will give detector responses that are considered the lower limits for precise quantitative measurements. (Section 4.2)

      Table 1.2.3.2
      RQL for SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      analyte ng ppb µg/m3

      xylenes
      m-xylene
      o-xylene
      p-xylene
      ethylbenzene
      2823
      1495
      1084
      1456
      1049
      194.1
      103.7
      73.0
      100.4
      72.8
      842.7
      450.3
      317.0
      435.9
      316.0



      1.2.4 Instrument calibration

      The coefficients of determination (r2) and of nondetermination (k2) for the calibration curves are shown in Table 1.2.4. The calibrated range was 0.5 to 2 times the OSHA PEL. (Section 4.3)

      Table 1.2.4
      Coefficients of Determination (r2)
      and Nondetermination (k2)

      analyte charcoal tubes SKC 575-002
      Pass Samplers
      r2 k2 r2 k2

      m-xylene 0.9994 6×10-4 0.9998 2×10-4
      o-xylene 0.9995 5×10-4 0.9998 2×10-4
      p-xylene 0.9994 6×10-4 0.9998 2×10-4
      ethylbenzene 0.9994 6×10-4 0.9998 2×10-4



      1.2.5 Precision (overall procedure)

      Charcoal tubes

      The precision of the overall procedure at the 95% confidence interval for the ambient temperature 16-day storage test (at the target concentration) are shown in Table 1.2.5.1. Each precision includes an additional 5% for sampling pump variability. (Section 4.4)

      Table 1.2.5.1
      Precision of the Overall Procedure for Charcoal Tubes

      analyte precision (±%)

      xylenes
      m-xylene
      o-xylene
      p-xylene
      ethylbenzene
      10.8
      10.7
      11.0
      11.1
      10.6



      SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      The precision of the overall procedure at the 95% confidence interval for the ambient temperature 16-day storage tests (at the target concentration) are given in Table 1.2.5.2. They each include an additional 8.7% for sampling rate variability. There are different values given, depending on whether both, either, or neither temperature or atmospheric pressure are known at the sampling site. If the sampling-site temperature (T) is unknown, it is assumed to be 22.2 ± 15 °C (72 ± 27 °F) and a variability of ±7.7% is included. If the atmospheric pressure (P) is unknown, it is estimated from sampling-site elevation and a variability of ±3% is included. (Section 4.4)

      Table 1.2.5.2
      Precision of the Overall Procedure for SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers (±%)

      condition xylenes m-xylene o-xylene p-xylene ethylbenzene

      both T and P known
      only T known
      only P known
      neither T nor P known
      18.2
      19.1
      23.7
      24.4
      18.3
      19.2
      23.7
      24.4
      18.1
      19.0
      23.6
      24.3
      18.3
      19.2
      23.7
      24.4
      18.4
      19.3
      23.8
      24.5




      1.2.6 Recovery

      The recoveries from samples used in 16-day ambient temperature storage tests remained above those shown in Table 1.2.6. (Section 4.5)

      Table 1.2.6
      Recovery (%)

      analyte charcoal
      tubes
      SKC 575-002
      Passive Samlers

      xylenes
      m-xylene
      o-xylene
      p-xylene
      ethylbenzene
      99.1
      99.6
      98.5
      98.5
      100.2
      97.7
      98.2
      96.6
      97.8
      99.5

      1.2.7 Reproducibility

      Twelve samples (six active and six diffusive) collected from test atmospheres were submitted for analysis by SLTC. The samples were analyzed according to instructions presented in a draft copy of this method after 16 and 22 days of storage at ambient temperature for the active and diffusive samplers, respectively. No individual result deviated from its theoretical value by more than the precision reported in Section 1.2.5. (Section 4.6)

2. Sampling procedure

    All safety practices that apply to the work area being sampled should be followed. The sampling equipment should be attached to the worker in such a manner that it will not interfere with work performance or safety.

    2.1 Apparatus

      2.1.1 Charcoal tubes

      Samples are collected with a personal sampling pump calibrated, with the sampler attached, to within ±5% at 50 mL/min.

      Samples are collected with 7-cm × 4-mm i.d. × 6-mm o.d. flame sealed glass sampling tubes containing two sections of coconut shell charcoal. The front section contains 100 mg and the back section contains 50 mg of charcoal. The sections are held in place and separated with glass wool and polyurethane plugs. Commercially prepared sampling tubes were purchased from SKC for this evaluation (SKC Catalog no. 226-01, Lot 2000).

      2.1.2 SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      Samples are collected with SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers. These samplers contain 500 mg of Anasorb 747. Lot numbers 347, 764, and 872 were used in this evaluation.

      A thermometer and a barometer are needed to determine sampling site temperature and pressure.

    2.2 Reagents

    None required.

    2.3 Technique

      2.3.1 Charcoal tubes

      Immediately before sampling, break off both ends of the flame sealed sampling tube to provide openings approximately half the internal diameter of the tube. Wear eye protection when breaking tubes. Use sampling tube holders to shield the employee from the sharp, jagged ends of the sampling tubes. All sampling tubes should be from the same lot.

      Use the smaller charcoal section of the sampling tube as a back-up and position it nearest the sampling pump. Attach the sampling tube to the sampling pump so that the tube is in an approximately vertical position with the inlet down during sampling. Position the sampling tube so that it does not impede work performance or safety.

      Draw air to be sampled directly into the tube inlet. Sampled air is not to pass through any hose or tubing before entering the sampling tube.

      Remove the sampler and seal the tube with plastic end caps after sampling for the appropriate time. Seal each sample end-to-end with an OSHA-21 form as soon as possible.

      Submit at least one blank sample with each set of samples. Handle the blank sampler in the same manner as the other samples, except draw no air through it.

      Record sample air volume in liters for each sample, and record any potential interference.

      Submit the samples to the laboratory for analysis as soon as possible after sampling. Store the samples at reduced temperature if delay is unavoidable. Ship any bulk samples separate from air samples.

      2.3.2 SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers (In general, follow the manufacturer's instructions)

      Remove the sampler from the clear package just before sampling. CAUTION - The monitor begins to sample as soon as it is removed from this package. Retain the O-ring, press-on cover, cover retainer, port plugs, and PTFE tube for later use.

      Record the start time on the sampler label, or on the Form OSHA-91A.

      Attach the sampler near the worker's breathing zone with the perforations in the sampler facing out. Assure that the area directly in front of the sampler is unobstructed throughout the sampling period.

      Remove the sampler from the worker immediately at the end of the sampling period. Attach the cover with the O-ring in place onto the sampler using the cover retainer. Inspect the O-ring to be sure it is forming a good seal around the entire circumference of the sampler. Record the stop time on the sampler label, or on the Form OSHA-91A.

      Prepare a blank sample by removing it from its clear package, and then immediately attaching a cover with the O-ring in place onto it.

      Seal each sample with an OSHA-21 form.

      Verify that sampling times are properly recorded on Form OSHA-91A for each sample. Identify blank samples on this form.

      Record sampling site temperature and atmospheric pressure (station pressure) on Form OSHA-91A.

      List any chemicals that could be considered potential interferences, especially solvents, that are in use in the sampling area.

      Submit the samples to the laboratory for analysis as soon as possible. Store the samples in a refrigerator if delay is unavoidable. Include the port plugs and PTFE tubes which will be used in the laboratory analysis.

      Ship any bulk samples separate from air samples.

    2.4 Sampler capacity

      2.4.1 Charcoal tubes

      The sampling capacity of SKC Lot 2000 charcoal tubes was tested by sampling from a dynamically generated test atmosphere of mixed xylenes (1027 mg/m3 or 237 ppm). Samples were collected at 50 mL/min and the relative humidity was about 78% at 21 °C. No breakthrough from the front to the back section was observed, even after sampling for ten hours. The 5% breakthrough sampling time was determined to be in excess of 600 min. (Section 4.7.1)

      2.4.2 SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      The sampling rate and capacity of SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers were determined by sampling from dynamically generated test atmospheres of mixed xylenes (1027 mg/m3 or 237 ppm, at 78% relative humidity and 21 °C) for increasing time intervals. Sampling rates of 13.82 mL/min for m-xylene, 14.24 mL/min for o-xylene, 13.94 mL/min for p-xylene, and 13.83 mL/min for ethylbenzene at 760 mmHg and 25 °C were obtained from these tests. Sampler capacity was never exceeded, even after sampling for ten hours. (Section 4.7.2)

    2.5 Extraction efficiency

    It is the responsibility of the analytical laboratory to occasionally determine or confirm extraction efficiency because the adsorbent material, reagents, or technique may be different from those presented in this method.

      2.5.1 Charcoal tubes

      Table 2.5.1
      Extraction Efficiency from Charcoal (%)

      m-xylene o-xylene p-xylene ethylbenzene

      96.3 93.8 96.1 97.2

      Mean extraction efficiencies (EE) of the analytes from SKC Lot 2000 charcoal are presented in Table 2.5.1. The range studied was from the RQL to 2 times the 100 ppm OSHA PEL for each xylene isomer, and for ethylbenzene. The extraction efficiency was not affected by the presence of water. (Section 4.8.1)

      2.5.2 SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      Table 2.5.2
      Extraction Efficiency form Anasorb 747 (%)

      m-xylene o-xylene p-xylene ethylbenzene

      96.1 89.4 95.3 99.1

      Mean extraction efficiencies (EE) of the analytes from SKC Anasorb 747 (the adsorbent in SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers) are presented in Table 2.5.2. The range studied was from the RQL to 2 times the 100 ppm OSHA PEL for each xylene isomer, and for ethylbenzene. The extraction efficiency was not affected by the presence of water. (Section 4.8.2)

    2.6 Recommended sampling time and sampling rate

      2.6.1 Charcoal tubes

      Sample for up to 4 hours at 50 mL/min when using SKC 226-01 charcoal tubes to collect long-term samples. Sample for more than 5 min at 50 mL/min to collect short-term samples.

      2.6.2 SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      Sample for up to 4 hours when using SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers to collect long-term samples. Sample for more than 5 min to collect short-term samples.

      Table 2.6.2
      Sampling Rates for SKC 575-002 Passive
      Samplers (mL/min) at 760 mmHg and 25 °C

      m-xylene o-xylene p-xylene ethylbenzene

      13.82 14.24 13.94 13.83

      2.6.3 The air concentration equivalent to the reliable quantitation limit becomes larger when short-term samples are collected. For example, the reliable quantitation limit for xylenes is 733 ppb (3180 µg/m3) when 0.25 L of air is sampled using charcoal tubes.

    2.7 Sampling interferences (Section 4.9)

      2.7.1 Charcoal tubes

      Retention

      The ability of the sampler to retain the analytes following collection was tested. The retention efficiency of all analytes for all samples was above 100.8% when three charcoal tubes containing 3 mg of mixed xylenes were used to sample 9 L of contaminant-free air having a relative humidity of 80% at 20 °C.

      Low relative humidity

      The ability of the sampler to collect and retain the analytes at low relative humidity was tested. The collection efficiency of all analytes for all samples was above 99.2% when three charcoal tubes were used to sample 12 L of air containing two times the target concentration of mixed xylenes and having a relative humidity of 5% at 20 °C.

      Low concentration

      The ability of the sampler to collect and retain the analytes at low concentration was tested. The collection efficiency of all analytes for all samples was above 94.6% when three charcoal tubes were used to sample 12 L of air containing 0.1 times the target concentration of mixed xylenes and having a relative humidity of 80% at 22 °C.

      Interference

      The ability of the sampler to collect and retain the analytes in the presence of potential sampling interferences was tested. The collection efficiency of all analytes for all samples was above 101.2% when three charcoal tubes were used to sample 12 L of air containing one times the target concentration of mixed xylenes, 365 mg/m3 toluene, 372 mg/m3 butyl acetate, and a relative humidity of 81% at 21 °C.

      2.7.2 SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      Reverse diffusion

      The sampling method was tested for reverse diffusion. The retention efficiency of all analytes for all samples was above 99.6% when three SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers containing 0.9 mg of mixed xylenes were used to sample contaminant-free air having a relative humidity of 80% at 20 °C for three hours.

      Low relative humidity

      The sampling method was tested to determine if the sampling rates remained constant at low relative humidity. The sampling rate of all analytes for all samples was above 97.8% of the sampling rate reported in Section 2.6.2 when three SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers were used to sample air containing two times the target concentration of mixed xylenes and having a relative humidity of 5% at 20 °C for four hours. Low humidity did not affect the sampling rates.

      Low concentration

      The sampling method was tested to determine if the sampling rates remained constant at low concentration. The sampling rate of all analytes for all samples was above 95.0% of the sampling rate reported in Section 2.6.2 when three SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers were used to sample air containing 0.1 times the target concentration of mixed xylenes and having a relative humidity of 80% at 22 °C for four hours.

      Interference

      The sampling method was tested to determine if the sampling rates remained constant in the presence of sampling interferences. The sampling rate for all analytes for all samples was above 94.3% of the sampling rate reported in Section 2.6.2 when three SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers were used to sample air containing one times the target concentration of mixed xylenes, 365 mg/m3 toluene, 372 mg/m3 butyl acetate, and a relative humidity of 81% at 21 °C for four hours.

3. Analytical procedure

    Adhere to the rules set down in your Chemical Hygiene Plan (which is mandated by the OSHA Laboratory Standard). Avoid skin contact and inhalation of all chemicals.

    3.1 Apparatus

      3.1.1 A GC equipped with a flame ionization (FID) detector. A Hewlett-Packard Model 5890 Series II GC equipped with a ChemStation, an automatic sample injector, and an FID were used in this evaluation.

      3.1.2 A GC column capable of separating mixed xylenes from the extraction solvent, internal standards, and potential interferences. A J&W Scientific 60-m × 0.32-mm i.d. DB-Wax (0.5 µm df) capillary column was used in this evaluation.

      3.1.3 An electronic integrator or other suitable means of measuring GC detector response. A Waters Millennium Chromatography Manager system was used in this evaluation.

      3.1.4 Two and four-milliliter glass vials with PTFE-lined septum caps.

      3.1.5 One and two-milliliter volumetric pipets.

      3.1.6 A SKC Desorption Shaker with rack (226D-03K) was used to extract SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers in this evaluation.

    3.2 Reagents

      3.2.1 Xylenes, Isomers plus ethylbenzene, 98.5+%, A.C.S. reagent, Aldrich Chemical Co., Lot TR 02505LR, was used in this evaluation.

      3.2.2 m-xylene, 99+%, anhydrous, Aldrich Chemical Co., Lot 00249MQ, was used in this evaluation.

      3.2.3 o-Xylene, 98%, Spectrophotometric Grade, Aldrich Chemical Co., Lot 07946PN, was used in this evaluation.

      3.2.4 p-Xylene, 99+%, anhydrous, Aldrich Chemical Co., Lot TQ 25949MQ, was used in this evaluation.

      3.2.5 Ethylbenzene, 99.8%, anhydrous, Aldrich Chemical Co., Lot DR 03249JQ, was used in this evaluation.

      3.2.6 Carbon disulfide (CS2), 99.9+%, low benzene content, Aldrich Chemical Co., Lot 07546PN, was used in this evaluation.

      3.2.7 1-Phenylhexane (hexylbenzene), 97%, Aldrich Chemical Co., Lot 03006PZ, was used as an internal standard for SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers in this evaluation.

      3.2.8 p-Cymene, 99%, Aldrich Chemical Co., Lot 11703TR, was used as an internal standard for charcoal tube samples in this evaluation.

      3.2.9 The extraction solvent used for this evaluation consisted of 1 µL of the appropriate internal standard per milliter of CS2. CAUTION: extraction efficiency of the internal standard from the sampling medium has an effect on sample results. This effect is especially significant for SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers. Do not substitute internal standards unless extraction efficiencies are confirmed. Both internal standards can be present in the same extraction solvent if the appropriate internal standard is used to calibrate the GC, and to calculate sample results.

      3.2.10 GC grade nitrogen, air, and hydrogen were used in this evaluation.

    3.3 Standard preparation

      3.3.1 Prepare stock mixed standards by weighing 1-mL aliquots of all four analytes into the same container. For example: a neat mixed standard was prepared that contained 212.7 mg/mL of m-xylene, 212.6 mg/mL of o-xylene, 213.4 mg/mL of p-xylene, and 215.3 mg/mL of ethylbenzene.

      3.3.2 Prepare working range standards for the analysis of charcoal tubes by injecting microliter quantities of the stock mixed standard into 1-mL aliquots of extraction solvent (containing 1 µL p-cymene internal standard per milliter of CS2). For example, a working range standard was prepared by injecting 6.0 µL of the stock mixed standard into extraction solvent. This standard contained 1276 µg/mL of m-xylene, 1276 µg/mL of o-xylene, 1280 µg/mL of p-xylene, and 1292 µg/mL of ethylbenzene.

      3.3.3 Prepare working range standards for the analysis of SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers by first diluting the stock mixed standard (Section 3.4.1) 1 to 4 with CS2, and then injecting microliter quantities of the diluted stock mixed standard into 2-mL aliquots of extraction solvent (containing 1 µL 1-phenylhexane internal standard per milliter of CS2). For example, a working range standard was prepared by injecting 6.0 µL of the diluted stock mixed standard into extraction solvent. This standard contained 319.0 µg/mL of m-xylene, 318.9 µg/mL of o-xylene, 320.1 µg/mL of p-xylene, and 323.0 µg/mL of ethylbenzene.

      3.3.4 Prepare a sufficient number of standards so that sample results will likely be bracketed with standards. If sample results are outside the range of prepared standards, prepare and analyze additional standards, or dilute high samples with extraction solvent and then reanalyze the diluted samples.

    3.4 Sample preparation

      3.4.1 Charcoal tubes

      Remove the plastic end caps from the sampling tube and carefully transfer each section of the adsorbent into separate 2-mL glass vials. Check to be certain that no charcoal is trapped in the glass-wool plug. Discard the end caps, glass tube, glass wool plug, and foam plugs.

      Add 1.0 mL of extraction solvent to each vial and immediately seal each vial with a PTFE-lined septum cap.

      Shake the vials vigorously several times during the one-hour extraction time.

      3.4.2 SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      Cut off the ends of the two protruding tubes of each sampler with a razor blade or a sharp knife.

      Secure the sampler by clipping it to a rail of the detachable SKC Desorption Shaker rack. Carefully and slowly add 2.0 mL of extraction solvent through the protruding tube nearest the outside edge of the sampler using a volumetric pipet. The tip of the pipet should fit just inside the sampler tube. Immediately seal the sampler tubes with the plugs supplied by the manufacturer.

      Replace the rack onto the SKC Desorption Shaker and shake the samples for one hour.

      Do not allow the extracted sample to remain in the sampler. Transfer the extracted sample into 2-mL glass vials by removing the plugs from the protruding tubes, inserting the tapered end of the PTFE tube supplied by the manufacture into the protruding tube nearest the outside edge of the sampler, and carefully pouring the solution into a 2-mL glass vial. Immediately seal the vials with PTFE-lined septum caps.

    3.5 Analysis

      3.5.1 GC conditions

      zone temperatures:   column 40 °C, hold 1 min, program at 4 °C/min to 140 °C, and hold as necessary to clear column
      injector 220 °C
      detector 220 °C
      gas flows: hydrogen (carrier) 4.4 mL/min (115 kPa head pressure)
      nitrogen (makeup)   38 mL/min
      hydrogen (FID) 35 mL/min
      air (FID) 455 mL/min
      signal range: 3
      injection volume: 1 µL (20:1 split)
      column: 60 m × fused silica 0.32-mm i.d. DB Wax 0.5-µm df
      chromatogram

      Figure 3.5.1 Chromatogram of a sample desorbed from charcoal. Concentration is approximately the 100-ppm PEL for each analyte. Key: (1) CS2, (2) ethylbenzene, (3) p-xylene, (4) m-xylene, (5) o-xylene, (6) p-cymene, (7) 1-phenylhexane.

      3.5.2 Measure peak areas with an electronic integrator or other suitable means.

      3.5.3 An internal standard (ISTD) method is used to calibrate the instrument in terms of micrograms of analyte per sample. Prepare a calibration curve by analyzing standards, and constructing calibration curves by plotting ISTD-corrected detector response versus mass of analyte. Bracket sample results with standards.

calibration curve
Figure 3.5.3.1 Calibration curve for m-xylene standards used to analyze charcoal tubes constrcted from the data in Table 4.3.1.
calibration curve
Figure 3.5.3.2 Calibration curve for m-xylene standards used to analyze SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers constructed from the data in Table 4.3.5.
calibration curve
Figure 3.5.3.3 Calibration curve for o-xylene standards used to analyze charcoal tubes constructed from the data in Table 4.3.2.
calibration curve
Figure 3.5.3.4 Calibration curve for o-xylene standards used to analyze SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers constructed from the data in Table 4.3.6.
calibration curve
Figure 3.5.3.5 Calibration curve for p-xylene standards used to analyze charcoal tubes constructed from the data in Table 4.3.3.
calibration curve
Figure 3.5.3.6 Calibration curve for p-xylene standards used to analyze SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers constructed from the data in Table 4.3.7.
calibration curve
Figure 3.5.3.7 Calibration curve for ethylbenzene standards used to analyze charcoal tubes constructed from the data in Table 4.3.4.
calibration curve
Figure 3.5.3.8 Calibration curve for ethylbenzene standards used to analyze SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers constructed from the data in Table 4.3.8.

    3.6 Interferences (analytical)

      3.6.1 Any chemical that produces an FID response and has a similar retention time as any of the analytes or internal standard is a potential interference. Any reported potential interferences should be considered before samples are extracted. Generally, chromatographic conditions can be altered to separate an interference from an analyte or an internal standard.

      3.6.2 The identity or purity of an analyte peak can be confirmed with additional analytical data. (Section 4.10)

    3.7 Calculations

      3.7.1 Charcoal tubes

      Obtain separate amounts of each analyte (m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene, ethylbenzene) per sample from the appropriate calibration curve in terms of micrograms per sample. These amounts are uncorrected for extraction efficiency. Be certain that the correct internal standard was used to calculate results (See Section 3.2.9). The back section of the sampling tube is analyzed primarily to determine the extent of sampler saturation. If any analyte is found on the back section, it is added to the amount found on the front section. This amount is then corrected by subtracting the total amount (if any) found on the blank. The air concentrations are then calculated using the following formulas. Calculate xylenes exposure by summing the individual xylene isomer results.

      mg/m3   =   micrograms of analyte per sample
      liters of air sampled × extraction efficiency
        ppm   =   24.46 × mg/m3
      106.17


      Where   24.46 is the molar volume at 25 °C and 101.3 kPa (760 mmHg)
      106.17 is the molecular weight of m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene, and ethylbenzene

      3.7.2 SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      Obtain separate amounts of each analyte (m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene, ethylbenzene) per sample from the appropriate calibration curve in terms of micrograms per sample. These amounts are uncorrected for extraction efficiency. Be certain that the correct internal standard was used to calculate results. This amount is then corrected by subtracting the amount (if any) found on the blank.

      Table 3.7.2
      Sampling Rates for SKC 573-002 Passive
      Samplers (mL/min) at 760 mmHg and 25 °C

      m-xylene o-xylene p-xylene ethylbenzene

      13.82 14.24 13.94 13.83

      Sampling time, sampling site temperature (°C), and sampling site pressure (mmHg) is information given by the person submitting the samples. Sampling rates at 760 mmHg and 25 °C (SRNTP) are given in Table 3.7.2. These sampling rates must be converted to their equivalent (SRamb) at sampling site temperature (T) and sampling site pressure (P) by the following formula:

      equation

      Assume sampling site temperature is 22.2 °C if it is not given. If sampling site pressure is not given, it can be calculated by the following formula:

      P = ( 3.887 × 10-7 ) E2 - ( 2.7467 × 10-2 ) E + 760

      Where
      P is the approximate sampling site barometric pressure. E is the sampling site elevation. E can be estimated from airports near the sampling site location using a web site such as http://www.osha-slc.gov/pls/oshaweb/owaredirect.html?p_url=http://www.airnav.com

      Liters of air sampled is calculated by multiplying the appropriate SRamb by sampling time.

      Air concentrations are then calculated using the following formulas. Calculate xylenes exposure by summing the individual xylene isomer results.

      mg/m3   =   micrograms of analyte per sample
      liters of air sampled × extraction efficiency
      ppm   =   24.46 × mg/m3
      106.17


      Where   24.46 is the molar volume at 25 °C and 101.3 kPa (760 mmHg)
      106.17 is the molecular weight of m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene, and ethylbenzene

4. Backup Data

    General background information about determination of detection limits and precision of the overall procedure is found in OSHA SLTC "Evaluation Guidelines for Air Sampling Methods Utilizing Chromatographic Analysis"22. The Guidelines define analytical parameters and specify required laboratory tests, statistical calculations and acceptance criteria.

    4.1 Detection limit of the analytical procedure (DLAP)

    Table 4.1
    Detection Limit of the
    Analytical Procedure

    analyte DLAP (pg)

    xylenes
    m-xylene
    o-xylene
    p-xylene
    ethylbenzene
    14.5 
    2.1
    8.4
    14.0 
    5.7

    The DLAP is measured as the mass of analyte introduced into the chromatographic column. Ten standards were prepared in equal descending increments of analyte, such that the highest standard produced a peak approximately 10 times the response of a reagent blank. These standards, and a reagent blank, were analyzed using the recommended analytical parameters (1-µL injection with a 20:1 split), and the data obtained were used to determine the required parameters (A and SEEDL) for the calculation of the DLAP. Xylenes DLOP was calculated by summing masses and areas for individual xylene isomers. The extraction solvent contained a contaminant that eluted at the same time as p-xylene. The amount of this contaminant was small, but sufficient to cause a higher DLAP for p-xylene than for the other analytes.

    Table 4.1.1
    DLAP for Xylenes

    concn
    (ng/mL)
    mass on
    column (pg)
    area counts
    (µV-s)

    0
    512
    1026
    1538
    2052
    2564
    3076
    3590
    4102
    4616
    5128
    0
    25.6
    51.3
    76.9
    102.6
    128.2
    153.8
    179.5
    205.1
    230.8
    256.4
    150
    196
    284
    369
    395
    482
    566
    636
    697
    769
    853

    graph

    Figure 4.1.1 Plot of data used to determine DLAP for xylenes.
     
    Table 4.1.2
    DLAP for m-Xylene

    concn
    (ng/mL)
    mass on
    column (pg)
    area counts
    (µV-s)

    0
    170
    342
    512
    684
    854
    1024
    1196
    1366
    1538
    1708
    0
    8.5
    17.1
    25.6
    34.2
    42.7
    51.2
    59.8
    68.3
    76.9
    85.4
    8
    32
    52
    80
    102
    123
    145
    168
    196
    215
    240

    graph

    Figure 4.1.2 Plot of data used to determine DLAP for m-xylene.
     
    Table 4.1.3
    DLAP for o-Xylene

    concn
    (ng/mL)
    mass on
    column (pg)
    area counts
    (µV-s)

    0
    172
    342
    514
    684
    856
    1028
    1198
    1370
    1540
    1712
    0
    8.6
    17.1
    25.7
    34.2
    42.8
    51.4
    59.9
    68.5
    77.0
    85.6
    0
    21
    37
    81
    85
    120
    143
    171
    174
    231
    235

    graph

    Figure 4.1.3 Plot of data used to determine DLAP for o-xylene.
     
    Table 4.1.4
    DLAP for p-Xylene

    concn
    (ng/mL)
    mass on
    column (pg)
    area counts
    (µV-s)

    0
    170
    342
    512
    684
    854
    1024
    1196
    1366
    1538
    1708
    0
    8.5
    17.1
    25.6
    34.2
    42.7
    51.2
    59.8
    68.3
    76.9
    85.4
    142
    143
    195
    208
    208
    239
    278
    297
    327
    323
    368

    graph

    Figure 4.1.4 Plot of data used to determine DLAP for p-xylene.
     
    Table 4.1.5
    DLAP for Ethylbenzene

    concn
    (ng/mL)
    mass on
    column (pg)
    area counts
    (µV-s)

    0
    174
    346
    520
    692
    866
    1040
    1212
    1386
    1558
    1732
    0
    8.7
    17.3
    26.0
    34.6
    43.3
    52.0
    60.6
    69.3
    77.9
    86.6
    0
    26
    38
    66
    92
    120
    146
    165
    177
    206
    233

    graph

    Figure 4.1.5 Plot of data used to determine DLAP for ethylbenzene.

    4.2 Detection limit of the overall procedure (DLOP) and reliable quantitation limit (RQL)

    Table 4.2
    Detection Limit of the Overall Procedure Summary

    analyte charcoal
    tubes
    SKC 575-002
    Passive Samplers
    ng µg/m3 ppb ng µg/m3 ppb

    xylenes
    m-xylene
    o-xylene
    p-xylene
    ethylbenzene
    322
    159
    239
    100
    129
    26.8
    13.2
    19.9
      8.3
    10.8
    6.2
    3.0
    4.6
    1.9
    2.5
    847
    448
    325
    437
    315
    252.8
    134.9
    95.0
    130.8
    94.9
    58.2
    31.1
    21.9
    30.1
    21.9

    The DLOP is measured as mass per sample and expressed as equivalent air concentrations, based on the recommended sampling parameters. Ten 100-mg portions of SKC Lot 2000 charcoal, and ten 500-mg portions of SKC Anasorb 747, (representing SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers) were spiked with equal descending increments of analyte, such that the highest sampler loading would produce a peak approximately 10 times the response for a sample blank. These spiked samples, and sample blanks were analyzed with the recommended analytical parameters, and the data obtained used to calculate the required parameters (A and SEEDL) for the calculation of DLOP and RQL. Xylenes DLOP and RQL were calculated by summing masses and areas for individual xylene isomers. Sample air volume and extraction efficiency for xylenes is the mean of those for individual xylene isomers. Table 4.2 is a summary of DLOP results and is presented for quick reference.

    Table 4.2.1
    DLOP and RQL
    for Xylenes from Charcoal Tubes

    mass per sample
    (ng)
    area counts
    (µV-s)

    0
    513
    1025
    1538
    2051
    2563
    3076
    3590
    4101
    4614
    5128
    139
    238
    272
    357
    423
    485
    524
    624
    691
    763
    835

    graph

    Figure 4.2.1 Plot of data used to determine DLOP and RQL for xylenes.
     
    Table 4.2.2
    DLOP and RQL for Xylenes
    from SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

    mass per sample
    (ng)
    area counts
    (µV-s)

    0
    1025
    2051
    3076
    4101
    5128
    6152
    7179
    8204
    9228
    10255
    136
    247
    278
    334
    452
    497
    588
    615
    696
    769
    844

    graph

    Figure 4.2.2 Plot of data used to determine DLOP and RQL for xylenes.
     
    Table 4.2.3
    DLOP and RQL
    for m-Xylene from Charcoal Tubes

    mass per sample
    (ng)
    area counts
    (µV-s)

    0
    171
    341
    512
    683
    853
    1024
    1195
    1365
    1536
    1707
    0
    39
    54
    74
    109
    116
    134
    168
    200
    215
    239

    graph

    Figure 4.2.3 Plot of data used to determine DLOP and RQL for m-xylene.
     
    Table 4.2.4
    DLOP and RQL for m-Xylene
    from SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

    mass per sample
    (ng)
    area counts
    (µV-s)

    0
    341
    683
    1024
    1365
    1707
    2048
    2390
    2731
    3072
    3414
    0
    46
    56
    61
    110
    116
    158
    175
    194
    226
    237

    graph

    Figure 4.2.4 Plot of data used to determine DLOP and RQL for m-xylene.
     
    Table 4.2.5
    DLOP and RQL
    for o-Xylene from Charcoal Tubes

    mass per sample
    (ng)
    area counts
    (µV-s)

    0
    171
    343
    514
    685
    857
    1028
    1200
    1371
    1542
    1714
    0
    31
    39
    70
    85
    121
    115
    161
    168
    210
    239

    graph

    Figure 4.2.5 Plot of data used to determine DLOP and RQL for o-xylene.
     
    Table 4.2.6
    DLOP and RQL for o-Xylene from
    SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

    mass per sample
    (ng)
    area counts
    (µV-s)

    0
    343
    685
    1028
    1371
    1714
    2056
    2399
    2742
    3084
    3427
    0
    29
    35
    69
    96
    112
    126
    147
    164
    190
    223

    graph

    Figure 4.2.6 Plot of data used to determine DLOP and RQL for o-xylene.
     
    Table 4.2.7
    DLOP and RQL
    for p-Xylene from Charcoal Tubes

    mass per sample
    (ng)
    area counts
    (µV-s)

    0
    171
    341
    512
    683
    853
    1024
    1195
    1365
    1536
    1707
    139
    168
    179
    213
    229
    248
    275
    295
    323
    338
    357

    graph

    Figure 4.2.7 Plot of data used to determine DLOP and RQL for p-xylene.
     
    Table 4.2.8
    DLOP and RQL for p-Xylene from
    SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

    mass per sample
    (ng)
    area counts
    (µV-s)

    0
    341
    683
    1024
    1365
    1707
    2048
    2390
    2731
    3072
    3414
    136
    172
    187
    204
    246
    269
    304
    293
    338
    353
    384

    graph

    Figure 4.2.8 Plot of data used to determine DLOP and RQL for p-xylene.
     
    Table 4.2.9
    DLOP and RQL
    for Ethylbenzene from Charcoal Tubes

    mass per sample
    (ng)
    area counts
    (µV-s)

    0
    173
    346
    519
    692
    865
    1038
    1211
    1384
    1558
    1731
    0
    35
    44
    76
    88
    118
    136
    153
    182
    198
    231

    graph

    Figure 4.2.9 Plot of data used to determine DLOP and RQL for ethylbenzene.
     
    Table 4.2.10
    DLOP and RQL for Ethylbenzene from
    SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

    mass per sample
    (ng)
    area counts
    (µV-s)

    0
    346
    692
    1038
    1384
    1731
    2077
    2423
    2769
    3115
    3461
    0
    25
    52
    71
    90
    111
    143
    153
    186
    212
    251

    graph

    Figure 4.2.10 Plot of data used to determine DLOP and RQL for ethylbenzene.


    The RQL is considered the lower limit for precise quantitative measurements. It is determined from the regression line parameters obtained for calculation of DLOP, providing the extraction efficiency (EE) is 100 ± 25% at the RQL.

    Table 4.2.11
    Reliable Quantitation Limits

    charcoal
    tubes
    SKC 575-002
    Passive Samplers
    analyte ng µg/m3 ppb EE(%) ng µg/m3 ppb EE(%)

    xylenes
    m-xylenes
    o-xylenes
    p-xylenes
    ethylbenzene
    1072
    531
    795
    334
    431
    89.3
    44.2
    66.2
    27.8
    35.9
    20.6
    10.2
    15.3
    6.4
    8.3
    98.4
    98.9
    95.6
    99.9
    99.4
    2823
    1495
    1084
    1456
    1049
    842.7
    450.3
    317.0
    435.9
    316.0
    194.1
    103.7
    73.0
    100.4
    72.8
    93.6
    96.4
    84.9
    95.6
    97.6



chromatogram
Figure 4.2.11 Chromatogram of a sample containing masses of analytes approximating the RQLs extracted from a charcoal tube. Key: (1) ethylbenzene, (2) p-xylene, (3) m-xylene, (4) o-xylene.
chromatogram
Figure 4.2.12 Chromatogram of a sample containing masses of analytes approximating the RQLs extracted from a SKC 575-002 Passive Sampler. Key: (1) ethylbenzene, (2) p-xylene, (3) m-xylene, (4) o-xylene.

    4.3 Instrument calibration

    The instrument was calibrated for xylene isomers and ethylbenzene over a range of from 0.5 to 2 times the 100 ppm PEL for each analyte. Calibration was performed at concentrations appropriate for both active and diffusive samplers. Calibration curves were constructed from the tabulated data and are shown in Section 3.5.3. Coefficients of determination (r2) and of nondetermination (k2) are shown in Table 4.3.

    Table 4.3
    Coefficient of Determination (r2)
    and of Nondetermination (k2)

    analyte charcoal
    tubes
    SKC 575-002
    Pass Sampers
    r2 k2 r2 k2

    m-xylene 0.9994 6 × 10-4 0.9998 2 × 10-4
    o-xylene 0.9995 5 × 10-4 0.9998 2 × 10-4
    p-xylene 0.9994 6 × 10-4 0.9998 2 × 10-4
    ethylbenzene 0.9994 6 × 10-4 0.9998 2 × 10-4



    Table 4.3.1
    Instrument Response to
    m-Xylene for Charcoal Tubes

    × OSHA PEL
    (µg/sample)
    0.5×
    2568
    0.75×
    3852

    5136
    1.5×
    7704

    10272

    area (µV-s) 164794
    164754
    164983
    164992
    165047
    165182
    269791
    269445
    269434
    269351
    269191
    268965
    375905
    375908
    376753
    376901
    375901
    375624
    593689
    592710
    593187
    592430
    591644
    593035
    783759
    784944
    786776
    784541
    784130
    783251




    Table 4.3.2
    Instrument Response to
    o-Xylene for Charcoal Tubes

    × OSHA PEL
    (µg/sample)
    0.5×
    2590
    0.75×
    3884

    5179
    1.5×
    7769

    10358

    area (µV-s) 167753
    167760
    167934
    167902
    167961
    168094
    274897
    274708
    274660
    274497
    274406
    274212
    383480
    383480
    384309
    384433
    383472
    383231
    606183
    605143
    605576
    605029
    604460
    605477
    801612
    802500
    804231
    802144
    801744
    800999




    Table 4.3.3
    Instrument Response to
    p-Xylene for Charcoal Tubes

    × OSHA PEL
    (µg/sample)
    0.5×
    2559
    0.75×
    3839

    5118
    1.5×
    7678

    10237

    area (µV-s) 164552
    164539
    164734
    164768
    164807
    164923
    268846
    268538
    268527
    268449
    268265
    268051
    374277
    374271
    375116
    375271
    374253
    374021
    590454
    589602
    590062
    589284
    588468
    589848
    779090
    780366
    782170
    779941
    779572
    778654




    Table 4.3.4
    Instrument Response to
    Ethylbenzene for Charcoal Tubes

    × OSHA PEL
    (µg/sample)
    0.5×
    2608
    0.75×
    3912

    5216
    1.5×
    7824

    10432

    area (µV-s) 164275
    164292
    164473
    164518
    164581
    164665
    269560
    269199
    269224
    269089
    268885
    268679
    375888
    375846
    376676
    376857
    375780
    375508
    593883
    593063
    593502
    592685
    591749
    593173
    783759
    785278
    787146
    784787
    784405
    783391




    Table 4.3.5
    Instrument Response to m-Xylene
    for SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

    × OSHA PEL
    (µg/sample)
    0.5×
    749
    0.75×
    1177

    1455
    1.5×
    2140

    2889

    area (µV-s) 29838
    29955
    29857
    29887
    29836
    29842
    47626
    47689
    47832
    47847
    47796
    47774
    58960
    59183
    59046
    59397
    59004
    59284
    86200
    86119
    86097
    85956
    85933
    85854
    117788
    117903
    117765
    118128
    117561
    117760




    Table 4.3.6
    Instrument Response to o-Xylene
    for SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

    × OSHA PEL
    (µg/sample)
    0.5×
    755
    0.75×
    1187

    1467
    1.5×
    2158

    2913

    area (µV-s) 30464
    30579
    30508
    30521
    30486
    30483
    48643
    48697
    48848
    48880
    48780
    48795
    60209
    60434
    60309
    60692
    60248
    60531
    88024
    87973
    87915
    87801
    87757
    87695
    120324
    120516
    120317
    120670
    120081
    120298




    Table 4.3.7
    Instrument Response to p-Xylene
    for SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

    × OSHA PEL
    (µg/sample)
    0.5×
    746
    0.75×
    1173

    1450
    1.5×
    2133

    2879

    area (µV-s) 29754
    29867
    29774
    29817
    29771
    29772
    47433
    47507
    47680
    47672
    47625
    47597
    58707
    58961
    58809
    59157
    58765
    59041
    85808
    85716
    85692
    85590
    85545
    85468
    117229
    117319
    117199
    117578
    116981
    117192




    Table 4.3.8
    Instrument Response to Ethylbenzene
    for SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

    × OSHA PEL
    (µg/sample)
    0.5×
    761
    0.75×
    1195

    1478
    1.5×
    2173

    2934

    area (µV-s) 29797
    29920
    29824
    29882
    29834
    29816
    47592
    47668
    47822
    47826
    47764
    47738
    58904
    59197
    59043
    59390
    58958
    59261
    86193
    86089
    86057
    85970
    85917
    85830
    117774
    117857
    117737
    118148
    117530
    117767

    4.4 Precision (overall procedure)

      4.4.1 Charcoal tubes

      The precision at the 95% confidence level is obtained by multiplying the SEE by 1.96 (the z-statistic from the standard normal distribution at the 95% confidence level). In Section 4.5, 95% confidence intervals are drawn about their respective regression lines in the storage graph figures. The precisions of the overall procedure were obtained from the ambient temperature storage tests and are shown in Table 4.4.1.

      Table 4.4.1
      SEEs and Precisions of the
      Overall Procedure for Charcoal Tubes

      analyte SEE(%) precision(±%)

      xylenes
      m-xylene
      o-xylene
      p-xylene
      ethylbenzene
      5.50
      5.45
      5.59
      5.67
      5.41
      10.8
      10.7
      11.0
      11.1
      10.6

      4.4.2 SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      The precision at the 95% confidence level is obtained by multiplying the SEE by 1.96 (the z-statistic from the standard normal distribution at the 95% confidence level). In Section 4.5, 95% confidence intervals are drawn about their respective regression lines in the storage graph figures. Each precision includes an additional 8.7% for sampling rate variability. There are different values given, depending on whether both, either, or neither temperature or atmospheric pressure are known at the sampling site. If the sampling-site temperature (T) is unknown, it is assumed to be 22.2 ± 15 °C (72 ± 27 °F) and a variability of ±7.7% is included. If the atmospheric pressure (P) is unknown, it is estimated from sampling-site elevation and a variability of ±3% is included. The precisions of the overall procedure are shown in Table 4.4.2.

Table 4.4.2
SEEs and Precisions of the Overall Procedure for SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

condition xylenes m-xylene o-xylene p-xylene ethylbenzene
SEE
(%)
precision
(±%)
SEE
(%)
precision
(±%)
SEE
(%)
precision
(±%)
SEE
(%)
precision
(±%)
SEE
(%)
precision
(±%)

both T and P known
only T known
only P known
neither T nor P known
9.29
9.76
12.07
12.43
18.2
19.1
23.7
24.4
9.32
9.79
12.09
12.46
18.3
19.2
23.7
24.4
9.24
9.71
12.03
12.40
18.1
19.0
23.6
24.3
9.33
9.80
12.10
12.46
18.3
19.2
23.7
24.4
9.39
9.86
12.14
12.51
18.4
19.3
23.8
24.5

    4.5 Storage tests

      4.5.1 Charcoal tubes

      Storage stability samples were prepared by sampling (at 50 mL/min for four hours) dynamically generated test atmospheres of mixed xylenes with SKC 226-01 sampling tubes. These samples were collected simultaneously along with diffusive samples. The concentrations of the test atmospheres were 207 mg/m3 (48 ppm) for m-xylene, 96 mg/m3 (22 ppm) for o-xylene, 90 mg/m3 (21 ppm) for p-xylene, and 73 mg/m3 (17 ppm) for ethylbenzene at 83% relative humidity and 20 °C. Xylenes concentration was the sum of the individual isomers and was 393 mg/m3 (91 ppm). These air concentrations were approximately one times the target concentration for xylenes and were in the same proportions as were the analytes in the mixed xylenes used to generate the test atmospheres. Xylenes results were calculated from summed individual isomers results. Sample results are corrected for extraction efficiency.

      Table 4.5.1.1
      Storage Tests for Xylenes

      time
      (days)
      ambient storage
      recovery (%)
      refrigerated storage
      recovery (%)

      0
      3
      7
      10
      14
      16
      97.0
      101.1
      102.2
      96.5
      101.6
      99.8
      98.9
      102.5
      97.4
      97.9
      96.7
      97.0
      96.8
      100.3
      103.1
      99.2
      97.9
      101.1
      97.0
      103.1
      96.3
      100.4
      101.3
      101.7
      98.9
      101.3
      100.2
      98.2
      99.4
      93.8
      96.8
      100.3
      100.8
      98.8
      100.2
      102.0




      Table 4.5.1.2
      Storage Tests for m-Xylene

      time
      (days)
      ambient storage
      recovery (%)
      refrigerated storage
      recovery (%)

      0
      3
      7
      10
      14
      16
      97.3
      101.4
      102.5
      97.0
      101.9
      100.6
      99.1
      102.8
      97.8
      98.3
      97.2
      98.7
      97.2
      100.6
      103.3
      99.5
      99.8
      101.9
      97.3
      103.3
      97.6
      100.7
      101.6
      102.0
      99.1
      101.6
      100.7
      98.7
      99.7
      93.7
      97.2
      100.6
      101.2
      99.2
      100.5
      102.3




      Table 4.5.1.3
      Storage Tests for o-Xylene

      time
      (days)
      ambient storage
      recovery (%)
      refrigerated storage
      recovery (%)

      0
      3
      7
      10
      14
      16
      96.1
      100.7
      101.5
      95.2
      101.0
      99.5
      98.4
      101.8
      96.3
      97.0
      95.6
      95.8
      95.9
      99.5
      102.6
      98.4
      98.5
      100.6
      96.1
      102.5
      95.6
      99.6
      100.6
      101.1
      98.4
      100.7
      99.2
      96.9
      98.8
      94.4
      95.9
      99.6
      100.0
      97.7
      99.5
      101.4




      Table 4.5.1.4
      Storage Tests for p-Xylene

      time
      (days)
      ambient storage
      recovery (%)
      refrigerated storage
      recovery (%)

      0
      3
      7
      10
      14
      16
      97.0
      101.1
      102.1
      96.6
      101.6
      99.6
      98.8
      102.5
      97.5
      98.0
      96.8
      97.0
      96.8
      100.3
      103.0
      99.2
      93.1
      101.1
      97.0
      103.0
      96.4
      100.4
      101.3
      101.7
      98.8
      101.3
      100.3
      98.3
      99.4
      93.5
      96.8
      100.3
      100.9
      98.9
      100.2
      101.9




      Table 4.5.1.5
      Storage Tests for Ethylbenzene

      time
      (days)
      ambient storage
      recovery (%)
      refrigerated storage
      recovery (%)

      0
      3
      7
      10
      14
      16
      98.2
      102.1
      103.1
      98.2
      102.5
      100.0
      99.7
      103.6
      99.0
      99.3
      98.6
      97.5
      98.3
      101.6
      103.9
      100.3
      100.8
      101.4
      98.2
      104.0
      97.5
      101.6
      102.3
      102.6
      99.7
      102.3
      101.9
      100.1
      100.6
      93.5
      98.3
      101.3
      102.2
      100.3
      101.2
      103.0




graph
Figure 4.5.1.1 Ambient storage test for xylenes collected on charcoal tubes.
  graph
Figure 4.5.1.2 Regrigerated storage test for xylenes collected on charcoal tubes.
 
graph
Figure 4.5.1.3 Ambient storage test for m-xylene collected on charcoal tubes.
graph
Figure 4.5.1.4 Regrigerated storage test for m-xylene collected on charcoal tubes.
 
graph
Figure 4.5.1.5 Ambient storage test for o-xylene collected on charcoal tubes.
graph
Figure 4.5.1.6 Regrigerated storage test for o-xylene collected on charcoal tubes.
 
graph
Figure 4.5.1.7 Ambient storage test for p-xylene collected on charcoal tubes.
graph
Figure 4.5.1.8 Regrigerated storage test for p-xylene collected on charcoal tubes.
 
graph
Figure 4.5.1.9 Ambient storage test for ethylbenzene collected on charcoal tubes.
graph
Figure 4.5.1.10 Regrigerated storage test for ethylbenzene collected on charcoal tubes.


      4.5.2 SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      Storage stability samples were prepared by sampling dynamically generated test atmospheres of mixed xylenes with SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers. The face velocity of the test atmosphere was about 0.4m/s past the diffusive samplers. The samplers were orientated parallel to the flow direction. These samples were collected for four hours simultaneously along with active samples under conditions described in Section 4.5.1. Xylenes results were calculated from summed isomers results. Sample results are corrected for extraction efficiency.

      Table 4.5.2.1
      Storage Tests for Xylenes

      time
      (days)
      ambient storage
      recovery (%)
      refrigerated storage
      recovery (%)

      0
      3
      7
      10
      14
      16
      96.6
      101.0
      104.6
      101.1
      98.0
      97.4
      97.3
      101.6
      93.5
      102.8
      92.9
      98.9
      97.1
      102.5
      99.7
      97.2
      99.7
      94.4
      96.6
      101.2
      100.9
      100.5
      100.6
      102.4
      97.3
      102.5
      100.0
      99.5
      99.4
      100.9
      97.1
      101.4
      98.6
      100.7
      100.5
      97.9




      Table 4.5.2.2
      Storage Tests for m-Xylene

      time
      (days)
      ambient storage
      recovery (%)
      refrigerated storage
      recovery (%)

      0
      3
      7
      10
      14
      16
      96.8
      101.5
      105.1
      101.6
      98.4
      97.9
      97.5
      102.2
      93.9
      103.3
      93.3
      99.4
      97.4
      103.1
      100.2
      97.6
      100.1
      94.9
      96.8
      101.8
      101.3
      100.9
      101.1
      102.9
      97.5
      103.1
      100.4
      100.0
      99.9
      101.4
      97.4
      101.9
      99.0
      101.1
      101.0
      98.4




      Table 4.5.2.3
      Storage Tests for o-Xylene

      time
      (days)
      ambient storage
      recovery (%)
      refrigerated storage
      recovery (%)

      0
      3
      7
      10
      14
      16
      96.2
      99.7
      103.4
      99.9
      96.9
      96.2
      96.8
      100.4
      92.4
      101.5
      92.1
      97.7
      96.6
      101.1
      98.6
      96.1
      99.0
      93.1
      96.2
      99.7
      99.9
      99.4
      99.3
      101.1
      96.8
      101.1
      98.8
      98.4
      98.2
      99.6
      96.6
      100.4
      97.3
      99.6
      99.3
      96.7




      Table 4.5.2.4
      Storage Tests for p-Xylene

      time
      (days)
      ambient storage
      recovery (%)
      refrigerated storage
      recovery (%)

      0
      3
      7
      10
      14
      16
      96.6
      101.2
      104.8
      101.3
      98.1
      97.5
      97.2
      101.8
      93.6
      103.1
      92.9
      99.1
      97.0
      102.8
      99.9
      97.3
      99.6
      94.5
      99.6
      101.5
      101.0
      100.6
      100.7
      102.5
      97.2
      102.8
      100.2
      99.7
      99.5
      101.0
      97.0
      101.5
      98.7
      100.8
      100.7
      98.0




      Table 4.5.2.5
      Storage Tests for Ethylbenzene

      time
      (days)
      ambient storage
      recovery (%)
      refrigerated storage
      recovery (%)

      0
      3
      7
      10
      14
      16
      97.4
      103.0
      106.5
      103.0
      99.6
      99.1
      98.1
      103.6
      95.2
      104.7
      94.3
      100.8
      98.0
      104.4
      101.5
      98.8
      101.0
      96.1
      97.4
      103.2
      102.6
      102.2
      102.7
      104.4
      98.1
      104.4
      101.7
      101.3
      101.2
      102.9
      98.0
      103.5
      100.4
      102.4
      102.4
      99.7




graph
Figure 4.5.2.1 Ambient storage test for xylenes collected on SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers.
  graph
Figure 4.5.2.2 Regrigerated storage test for xylenes collected on SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers.
 
graph
Figure 4.5.2.3 Ambient storage test for m-xylene collected on SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers.
graph
Figure 4.5.2.4 Regrigerated storage test for m-xylene collected on SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers.
 
graph
Figure 4.5.2.5 Ambient storage test for o-xylene collected on SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers.
graph
Figure 4.5.2.6 Regrigerated storage test for o-xylene collected on SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers.
 
graph
Figure 4.5.2.7 Ambient storage test for p-xylene collected on SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers.
graph
Figure 4.5.2.8 Regrigerated storage test for p-xylene collected on SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers.
 
graph
Figure 4.5.2.9 Ambient storage test for ethylbenzene collected on SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers.
graph
Figure 4.5.2.10 Regrigerated storage test for ethylbenzene collected on SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers.


    4.6 Reproducibility

    Twelve samples (six charcoal tubes and six SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers) were collected from controlled test atmospheres similar to that used to collect storage stability samples. The samples were submitted to SLTC for analysis. The charcoal tube samples were analyzed after 16 days of storage at ambient temperature, and the SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers after 22 days of storage at ambient temperature. Sample results were corrected for extraction efficiency. No sample result had a deviation greater than the precision of the overall procedure reported in Section 4.4. Xylenes results were calculated by summing results for individual isomers.

Table 4.6.1
Reproducibility Data for Xylene Isomers on Charcoal Tubes

m-xylene |
|
|
o-xylene |
|
|
p-xylene
theo
µg/samp
reported
µg/samp
recovery
(%)
deviation
(%)
theo
µg/samp
reported
µg/samp
recovery
(%)
deviation
(%)
theo
µg/samp
reported
µg/samp
recovery
(%)
deviation
(%)

2555
2595
2623
2557
2564
2623
2552
2593
2427
2580
2593
2610
99.9
99.9
92.5
100.9
101.1
99.5
-0.1
-0.1
-7.5
0.9
1.1
-0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
1189
1207
1221
1190
1193
1221
1245
1266
1158
1262
1263
1275
104.7
104.9
94.8
106.1
105.9
104.4
4.7
4.9
-5.2 
6.1
5.9
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
1112
1129
1142
1129
1116
1142
1140
1158
1082
1152
1159
1166
102.5
102.6
94.7
102.0
103.9
102.1
2.5
2.6
-5.3 
2.0
3.9
2.1




Table 4.6.2
Reproducibility Data for Xylenes and Ethylbenzene on Charcoal Tubes

xylenes |
|
|
ethylbenzene
theo
µg/samp
reported
µg/samp
recovery
(%)
deviation
(%)
theo
µg/samp
reported
µg/samp
recovery
(%)
deviation
(%)

4856
4931
4986
4876
4873
4986
4937
5017
4667
4994
5014
5051
101.7
101.7
93.6
102.4
102.9
101.3
1.7
1.7
-6.4 
2.4
2.9
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
904.8
918.9
929.0
905.6
911.8
929.0
929.4
944.2
895.4
939.1
945.6
944.3
102.7
102.8
96.4
103.7
103.7
101.6
2.7
2.8
-3.6 
3.7
3.7
1.6




Table 4.6.3
Reproducibility Data for Xylene Isomers on SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

m-xylene |
|
|
o-xylene |
|
|
p-xylene
theo
µg/samp
reported
µg/samp
recovery
(%)
deviation
(%)
theo
µg/samp
reported
µg/samp
recovery
(%)
deviation
(%)
theo
µg/samp
reported
µg/samp
recovery
(%)
deviation
(%)

847.6
847.6
847.6
847.6
847.6
847.6
859.1
823.9
811.5
806.0
805.5
803.3
101.4
97.2
95.7
95.1
95.0
94.8
1.4
-2.8
-4.3
-4.9
-5.0
-5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
401.3
401.3
401.3
401.3
401.3
401.3
430.8
417.1
408.8
399.0
406.3
398.9
107.4
103.9
101.9
99.4
101.2
99.4
7.4
3.9
1.9
-0.6
1.2
-0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
372.8
372.8
372.8
372.8
372.8
372.8
404.9
389.1
383.0
381.0
380.2
380.4
108.6
104.4
102.7
102.2
102.0
102.0
8.6
4.4
2.7
2.2
2.0
2.0




Table 4.6.4
Reproducibility Data for Xylenes and Ethylbenzene on SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

xylenes |
|
|
ethylbenzene
theo
µg/samp
reported
µg/samp
recovery
(%)
deviation
(%)
theo
µg/samp
reported
µg/samp
recovery
(%)
deviation
(%)

1622
1622
1622
1622
1622
1622
1695
1630
1603
1586
1592
1583
104.5
100.5
98.8
97.8
98.2
97.6
4.5
0.5
-1.2
-2.2
-1.8
-2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
302.3
302.3
302.3
302.3
302.3
302.3
312.2
298.3
293.9
295.0
291.7
293.7
103.3
98.7
97.2
97.6
96.5
97.2
3.3
-1.3
-2.8
-2.4
-3.5
-2.8

    4.7 Sampler capacity

      4.7.1 Charcoal tubes

      The sampling capacity of charcoal tubes was tested by sampling dynamically generated test atmospheres of mixed xylenes with SKC 226-01 (Lot 2000) sampling tubes. These samples were collected simultaneously along with diffusive samples. The sampling times were 5, 10, 15, and 30 min; and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10 hours. Three active and three diffusive samples were collected for each time period. The mean concentrations of the test atmospheres were 456 mg/m3 (105 ppm) for m-xylene, 212 mg/m3 (49 ppm) for o-xylene, 198 mg/m3 (46 ppm) for p-xylene, and 161 mg/m3 (37 ppm) for ethylbenzene at 78% relative humidity and 21 °C. These air concentrations were approximately two times the target concentration for xylenes and were in the same proportions as were the analytes in the mixed xylenes used to generate the test atmospheres. No breakthrough from the front to the back section of the sampling tubes for any of the analytes was observed even when samples were collected for ten hours at 50 mL/min. Sampler capacity was never exceeded. Nearly 31 mg of mixed xylenes had been collected after ten hours. The recommended sampling time was set at four hours and the recommended sampling rate at 50 mL/min. These tests also showed that samples can be collected for as short a time as 5 min at 50 mL/min and still provide excellent results.

      4.7.2 SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      The sampling rate and sampler capacity of SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers were determined with samples collected at the increasing time intervals from the controlled test atmospheres described in Section 4.7.1. The face velocity of the test atmosphere was approximately 0.4 m/s, and the samplers were orientated parallel to the flow direction. Three samples were collected at each time interval. Sampler capacity has been defined to be exceeded when the "apparent" sampling rate decreases rapidly. The sampling rate only appears to decrease because the sampler can collect no additional analyte at the point when capacity is exceeded. Sampling rates are presented in mL/min at 760 mmHg and 25 °C.

    Table 4.7.2
    Determination of Sampling Rate and Recommended Sampling Time

    time m-xylene o-xylene p-xylene ethylbenzene
    (h) mL/min RSD mL/min RSD mL/min RSD mL/min RSD

    0.083 13.75 2.2 14.25 3.8 13.99 2.8 13.85 2.3
    0.167 13.53 1.4 13.97 1.3 13.71 1.8 13.68 1.5
    0.25 13.91 0.9 14.38 0.9 14.01 0.9 13.96 0.8
    0.5 13.94 1.6 14.39 2.4 14.07 1.7 13.93 1.2
    1 13.81 2.1 14.17 2.4 13.94 2.2 13.86 2.2
    2 13.55 1.7 13.79 1.8 13.59 1.7 13.50 2.0
    3 14.01 1.4 14.27 1.4 14.04 1.4 13.96 1.5
    4 13.60 0.6 14.93 0.9 13.67 0.7 13.59 0.6
    6 14.20 5.0 14.40 5.0 14.48 5.0 14.19 5.0
    8 13.60 0.2 13.70 0.1 13.70 0.2 13.59 0.2
    10 14.11 2.6 14.35 2.5 14.16 2.7 14.06 2.6
     
    mean 13.82 14.24 13.94 13.83
    RSD 1.7 2.4 1.9 1.6



      The preliminary sampling rate was determined by averaging the values for the 0.5, 1, and 2 hour samples. Horizontal lines were constructed 10% above and 10% below the preliminary sampling rate. All the sampling rates were included in the calculated mean sampling rates because all were between the two horizontal lines.


graph
Figure 4.7.2.1 Sampler capacity data for m-xylene.
  graph
Figure 4.7.2.2 Sampler capacity data for o-xylene.
 
graph
Figure 4.7.2.3 Sampler capacity data for p-xylene.
  graph
Figure 4.7.2.4 Sampler capacity data for ethylbenzene.

    4.8 Extraction efficiency and stability of extracted samples

    Each laboratory must determine and confirm extraction efficiency periodically. Other solvents can be used in conjunction with this method provided the new solvent is tested. The new solvent should be tested as described below and the extraction efficiency must be greater than 75%.

    A summary of the extraction efficiency results over the range of RQL to 2 times the target concentration is presented in Table 4.8 for quick reference.

    Table 4.8
    Extraction Efficiency (%) Summary

    analyte charcoal
    tubes
    SKC 575-002
    Passive Samplers

    m-xylene 96.3 96.1
    o-xylene 93.8 89.4
    p-xylene 96.1 95.3
    ethylbenzene 97.2 99.1

      4.8.1 Charcoal tubes

      The extraction efficiencies (EEs) of the analytes were determined by liquid-spiking 100-mg portions of SKC Lot 2000 charcoal with the analytes at levels from the RQL to 2 times the OSHA PEL for each analyte. These samples were stored overnight at ambient temperature, and then extracted with 1mL of CS2 (containing 1 µL of p-cymene per mL of CS2) for 1 hour. The samples were vigorously shaken periodically over the extraction time. The EEs of the analytes at the target concentration were also determined from "wet" charcoal to confirm that EE remained constant. Wet charcoal was prepared by collecting samples from a humid (about 80% RH and 22 °C) atmosphere at 50 mL/min for 4 hours. Only the front section of these samples was used to prepare wet EE samples. The stability of extracted samples was investigated by reanalyzing the 1 × PEL samples a day after the original analysis. Three vials were immediately resealed with new septa caps and three vials retained their punctured septa following the original analysis.

Table 4.8.1.1
Extraction Efficiency of m-Xylene from SKC Lot 2000 Charcoal

level
sample number
× OSHA PEL µg per sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 mean

RQL 0.548 107.1 104.6 97.9 92.7 95.4 95.7 98.9
0.05 256 96.9 96.1 95.3 94.7 94.6 95.8 95.6
0.1 512 96.5 99.7 96.3 94.0 96.7 94.0 96.2
0.2 1024 96.5 95.2 94.6 96.5 95.6 94.4 95.5
0.5 2560 97.7 96.0 94.6 93.9 95.0 95.3 95.4
1.0 5136 97.0 96.5 96.5 97.6 98.1 97.9 97.3
2.0 10486 93.7 95.6 94.3 97.6 94.5 95.5 95.2
wet (1.0) 5136 98.0 96.4 97.7 97.4 96.6 97.9 97.3


The mean EE at concentrations from the RQL to 2 times the PEL (excepting the wet EE) is 96.3%.



Table 4.8.1.2
Extraction Efficiency of o-Xylene from SKC Lot 2000 Charcoal

level
sample number
× OSHA PEL µg per sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 mean

RQL 0.785 99.6 96.9 100.8 88.4 92.8 95.0 95.6
0.05 257 93.8 93.0 92.4 91.6 91.6 92.7 92.5
0.1 514 93.5 96.7 93.3 91.2 93.7 91.2 93.3
0.2 1028 93.6 92.3 91.8 93.6 92.6 91.4 92.6
0.5 2570 94.9 93.2 92.0 91.3 92.4 92.7 92.8
1.0 5179 94.6 94.0 94.0 95.1 95.4 95.4 94.8
2.0 10575 93.2 94.6 93.9 98.5 93.9 94.5 94.8
wet (1.0) 5179 95.2 93.8 95.1 94.8 93.9 95.1 94.7


The mean EE at concentrations from the RQL to 2 times the PEL (excepting the wet EE) is 93.8%.



Table 4.8.1.3
Extraction Efficiency of p-Xylene from SKC Lot 2000 Charcoal

level
sample number
× OSHA PEL µg per sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 mean

RQL 0.788 102.1 96.9 100.7 103.3 105.6 90.8 99.9
0.05 256 96.5 95.7 95.0 94.3 94.2 95.3 95.2
0.1 512 96.1 99.3 95.9 93.7 96.3 93.3 95.8
0.2 1024 96.2 94.8 94.2 96.1 95.1 94.0 95.1
0.5 2560 97.3 95.6 94.2 93.6 94.6 94.9 95.0
1.0 5118 96.6 96.0 96.0 97.2 97.7 97.5 96.8
2.0 10450 93.2 95.2 93.8 96.9 94.1 95.1 94.7
wet (1.0) 5118 97.5 95.9 97.3 96.9 96.2 97.5 96.9


The mean EE at concentrations from the RQL to 2 times the PEL (excepting the wet EE) is 96.1%.



Table 4.8.1.4
Extraction Efficiency of Ethylbenzene from SKC Lot 2000 Charcoal

level
sample number
× OSHA PEL µg per sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 mean

RQL 0.43 96.9 97.1 96.2 100.7 109.1 96.6 99.4
0.05 260 98.3 97.4 96.6 95.9 95.9 97.1 96.9
0.1 519 97.8 101.2 97.6 95.4 98.0 95.2 97.5
0.2 1038 97.9 96.5 95.8 97.9 96.8 95.8 96.8
0.5 2596 99.0 97.3 95.8 95.1 96.2 96.5 96.7
1.0 5216 98.2 97.7 99.0 98.8 99.3 99.1 98.7
2.0 10650 93.0 95.7 93.7 95.3 94.2 95.6 94.6
wet (1.0) 5216 99.3 97.7 99.0 98.6 97.9 99.3 98.6


The mean EE at concentrations from the RQL to 2 times the PEL (excepting the wet EE) is 97.2%.




Table 4.8.1.5
Stability of m-Xylene Extracted from SKC Lot 2000 Charcoal

punctured septa replaced
punctured septa retained
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)

97.0 97.4 0.4 97.6 96.1 -1.5
96.5 97.1 0.6 98.1 96.7 -1.4
96.5 98.2 1.7 97.9 95.9 -2.0
mean mean
96.7 97.6 0.9 97.9 96.2 -1.6




Table 4.8.1.6
Stability of o-Xylene Extracted from SKC Lot 2000 Charcoal

punctured septa replaced
punctured septa retained
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)

94.6 95.1 0.5 95.1 93.6 -1.5
94.0 94.6 0.6 95.4 94.1 -1.3
94.0 95.8 1.8 95.4 93.2 -2.2
mean mean
94.2 95.2 1.0 95.3 93.6 -1.7




Table 4.8.1.7
Stability of p-Xylene Extracted from SKC Lot 2000 Charcoal

punctured septa replaced
punctured septa retained
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)

96.6 97.0 0.4 97.2 95.6 -1.6
96.0 96.7 0.7 97.7 96.2 -1.5
96.0 97.8 1.8 97.5 95.3 -2.2
mean mean
96.2 97.2 1.0 97.5 95.7 -1.8




Table 4.8.1.8
Stability of Ethylbenzene Extracted from SKC Lot 2000 Charcoal

punctured septa replaced
punctured septa retained
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)

98.2 98.6 0.4 98.8 97.2 -1.6
97.7 98.2 0.5 99.3 97.8 -1.5
99.0 99.4 0.4 99.1 97.0 -2.1
mean mean
98.3 98.7 0.4 99.1 97.3 -1.7




      4.8.2 SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      The extraction efficiencies (EE) of the analytes were determined by liquid-spiking 500-mg portions of SKC Anasorb 747 (the sorbent in SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers) with the analytes at levels from the RQL to 2 times the OSHA PEL for each analyte. These samples were stored overnight at ambient temperature, and then extracted with 2 mL of CS2 (containing 1 µL of 1-phenylhexane per mL of CS2) for 1 hour. The samples were vigorously shaken periodically over the extraction time. The EEs of the analytes at the target concentration were also determined from "wet" samplers to confirm that EE remained constant. Wet SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers were prepared by sampling from a humid (about 80% RH and 22 °C) atmosphere for 4 hours. These samples were extracted with 2 mL of CS2 (containing 1 µL of 1-phenylhexane per mL of CS2) for 1 hour on a SKC 226D-03K Desorption Shaker. The stability of extracted samples was investigated by reanalyzing the 1 × PEL samples a day after the original analysis. Three vials were immediately resealed with new septa caps and three vials retained their punctured septa following the original analysis.

Table 4.8.2.1
Extraction Efficiency of m-Xylene from SKC Anasorb 747

level
sample number
× OSHA PEL µg per sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 mean

RQL 1.422 93.0 90.1 99.0 89.9 105.4 100.9 96.4
0.05 73 98.6 97.7 97.6 97.2 98.2 97.6 97.8
0.1 145 95.9 95.9 93.7 95.0 95.8 95.3 95.3
0.2 290 93.2 93.6 94.2 94.1 94.9 95.6 94.3
0.5 725 94.1 95.1 95.6 96.3 94.7 97.1 95.5
1.0 1451 97.2 96.1 101.1 95.8 96.0 97.0 97.2
2.0 2902 99.3 95.3 96.0 95.8 96.4 95.8 96.4
wet (1.0) 1498 96.6 96.7 93.8 98.0 96.7 95.3 96.2


The mean EE at concentrations from the RQL to 2 times the PEL (excepting the wet EE) is 96.1%.




Table 4.8.2.2
Extraction Efficiency of o-Xylene from SKC Anasorb 747

level
sample number
× OSHA PEL µg per sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 mean

RQL 1.075 83.9 76.4 86.3 87.8 86.6 88.1 84.9
0.05 73 92.3 90.9 91.0 90.4 91.8 91.5 91.3
0.1 146 89.8 89.6 87.5 89.0 89.9 89.3 89.2
0.2 292 87.7 88.0 88.4 88.4 89.0 89.8 88.6
0.5 728 88.4 89.2 89.8 90.4 88.8 91.2 89.6
1.0 1456 91.5 90.5 95.3 90.1 90.4 91.3 91.5
2.0 2913 93.7 88.7 90.7 90.5 90.9 90.4 90.8
wet (1.0) 1511 91.0 90.8 88.3 92.2 91.1 89.9 90.6


The mean EE at concentrations from the RQL to 2 times the PEL (excepting the wet EE) is 89.4%.




Table 4.8.2.3
Extraction Efficiency of p-Xylene from SKC Anasorb 747

level
sample number
× OSHA PEL µg per sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 mean

RQL 1.542 98.2 95.7 92.2 90.9 97.3 99.3 95.6
0.05 73 97.6 97.2 96.9 96.0 97.4 96.7 97.0
0.1 145 95.0 94.8 93.0 94.3 95.1 94.7 94.5
0.2 290 92.4 92.9 93.4 93.3 94.2 94.7 93.5
0.5 725 93.3 94.3 94.8 95.4 93.9 96.2 94.7
1.0 1451 96.3 95.2 100.2 94.9 95.1 96.1 96.3
2.0 2902 99.7 94.5 95.2 95.0 95.6 94.9 95.8
wet (1.0) 1493 95.7 95.7 92.9 97.0 95.8 94.4 95.3


The mean EE at concentrations from the RQL to 2 times the PEL (excepting the wet EE) is 95.3%.




Table 4.8.2.4
Extraction Efficiency of Ethylbenzene from SKC Anasorb 747

level
sample number
× OSHA PEL µg per sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 mean

RQL 1.058 99.7 105.0 93.7 88.5 95.2 103.4 97.6
0.05 74 102.2 101.2 101.1 100.2 101.2 100.8 101.1
0.1 147 99.1 99.1 97.3 98.6 99.3 98.6 98.7
0.2 294 96.3 96.8 97.5 97.2 98.4 98.8 97.5
0.5 736 97.3 98.4 98.9 99.5 98.3 100.5 98.8
1.0 1471 100.5 99.3 104.4 99.0 99.1 100.3 100.4
2.0 2942 102.6 98.3 99.1 98.8 99.6 98.9 99.6
wet (1.0) 1521 99.8 100.1 97.0 101.3 100.0 98.4 99.4


The mean EE at concentrations from the RQL to 2 times the PEL (excepting the wet EE) is 99.1%.




Table 4.8.2.5
Stability of m-Xylene Extracted from SKC Anasorb 747

punctured septa replaced
punctured septa retained
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)

97.2 97.8 0.6 95.8 94.2 -1.6
96.1 95.4 -0.7 96.0 94.0 -2.0
101.1 100.0 -1.1 97.0 95.7 -1.3
mean mean
98.1 97.7 -0.4 96.3 94.6 -1.6




Table 4.8.2.6
Stability of o-Xylene Extracted from SKC Anasorb 747

punctured septa replaced
punctured septa retained
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)

91.5 91.9 0.4 90.1 88.8 -1.3
90.5 89.7 -0.8 90.4 88.7 -1.7
95.3 94.2 -1.1 91.3 90.2 -1.1
mean mean
92.4 91.9 -0.5 90.6 89.2 -1.4




Table 4.8.2.7
Stability of p-Xylene Extracted from SKC Anasorb 747

punctured septa replaced
punctured septa retained
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)

96.3 96.9 0.6 94.9 93.5 -1.4
95.2 94.6 -0.6 95.1 93.3 -1.8
100.2 99.3 -0.9 96.1 94.9 -1.2
mean mean
97.2 96.9 -0.3 95.4 93.9 -1.5




Table 4.8.2.8
Stability of Ethylbenzene Extracted from SKC Anasorb 747

punctured septa replaced
punctured septa retained
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)
initial EE
(%)
EE after one day
(%)
difference
(%)

100.5 101.0 0.5 99.0 97.3 -1.7
99.3 98.7 -0.6 99.1 97.1 -2.0
104.4 103.4 -1.0 100.3 98.8 -1.5
mean mean
101.4 101.0 -0.4 99.5 97.7 -1.7




    4.9 Interferences (sampling)

      4.9.1 Charcoal tubes

      Retention

      The ability of charcoal tubes to retain mixed xylenes after collection was tested by sampling a test atmosphere containing 454 mg/m3, 211 mg/m3, 198 mg/m3, and 161 mg/m3 m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene, and ethylbenzene, respectively (at 80% RH and 20 °C) with six samplers for one hour at 50 mL/min. Three samples were analyzed immediately and three were used to sample contaminant-free humid air for an additional three hours, and then analyzed. All the samples in the second set retained at least 101.0, 101.2, 100.8, 101.0% of the means of the first set for m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene, and ethylbenzene, respectively.

      Table 4.9.1
      Retention of Mixed Xylenes on Charcoal Tubes

      m-xylene o-xylene p-xylene ethylbenzene
      (mg/m3) (% mean) (mg/m3) (% mean) (mg/m3) (% mean) (mg/m3) (% mean)

      1st set
      1
      2
      3
      mean
      2nd set
      1
      2
      3
      443.9
      428.5
      447.4
      439.9
       
      444.3
      453.4
      449.5
      101.0
      103.1
      102.2
      203.9
      194.6
      206.1
      201.5
       
      203.9
      208.3
      207.2
      101.2
      103.4
      102.8
      192.6
      185.7
      194.1
      190.8
       
      192.4
      196.7
      195.0
      100.8
      103.1
      102.2
      158.6
      154.8
      159.5
      157.6
       
      159.2
      161.9
      159.5
      101.0
      102.7
      101.2




      Low relative humidity

      The ability of charcoal tubes to collect mixed xylenes at low humidity was tested by sampling a test atmosphere containing 468 mg/m3, 218 mg/m3, 204 mg/m3, 166 mg/m3 m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene, and ethylbenzene, respectively (at 5% RH and 20 °C) with three samplers for four hours at 50 mL/min. The samples were analyzed immediately. The sample results (when compared to theoretical concentrations) were 102.0, 100.4, and 99.8% for m-xylene; 101.4, 100.4, and 99.2% for o-xylene; 101.6, 100.1, and 99.6% for p-xylene; and 102.5, 100.8, and 100.4% for ethylbenzene.

      Low concentration

      The ability of charcoal tubes to collect mixed xylenes at low concentrations was tested by sampling a test atmosphere containing 22 mg/m3, 10 mg/m3, 10 mg/m3, 8 mg/m3 m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene, and ethylbenzene, respectively (at 80% RH and 22 °C) with three samplers for four hours at 50 mL/min. The samples were analyzed immediately. The sample results (when compared to theoretical concentrations) were 95.2, 97.6, and 102.2 for m-xylene; 94.6, 96.1, and 101.2% for o-xylene; 95.0, 97.2, and 101.8% for p-xylene; and 96.1, 98.6, and 102.5% for ethylbenzene.

      Interference

      The ability of charcoal tubes to collect mixed xylenes in the presence of sampling interferences was tested by sampling a test atmosphere containing 230 mg/m3, 107 mg/m3, 100 mg/m3, 82 mg/m3, 365 mg/m3, 372 mg/m3 m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and butyl acetate respectively (at 81% RH and 21 °C) with three samplers for four hours at 50 mL/min. The samples were analyzed immediately. The sample results (when compared to theoretical concentrations) were 103.3, 102.9, and 101.8 for m-xylene; 102.8, 102.5, and 101.2% for o-xylene; 103.2, 102.6, and 101.6% for p-xylene; and 104.1, 103.4, and 102.6% for ethylbenzene.

      4.9.2 SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      Reverse diffusion

      The ability of SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers to retain mixed xylenes after collection was tested by sampling a test atmosphere containing 454 mg/m3, 211 mg/m3, 198 mg/m3, and 161 mg/m3 m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene, and ethylbenzene, respectively (at 80% RH and 20 °C) with six samplers for one hour. Three samples were analyzed immediately and three were used to sample contaminant-free humid air for an additional three hours, and then analyzed. Sampling rates from Section 4.7 were converted to their equivalents under experimental temperature and pressure and used to calculate results in Table 4.9.2. All the samples in the second set retained at least 100.2, 99.6, 99.8, and 100.0% of the means of the first set for m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene, and ethylbenzene, respectively.

      Table 4.9.2
      Retention of Mixed Xylenes on SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers

      m-xylene o-xylene p-xylene ethylbenzene
      (mg/m3) (% mean) (mg/m3) (% mean) (mg/m3) (% mean) (mg/m3) (% mean)

      1st set
      1
      2
      3
      mean
      2nd set
      1
      2
      3
      450.6
      449.4
      419.5
      439.8
       
      440.7
      449.0
      449.4
      100.2
      102.1
      102.2
      206.9
      208.0
      191.9
      202.3
       
      201.4
      206.0
      205.9
      99.6
      101.8
      101.8
      195.7
      197.0
      182.0
      191.6
       
      191.2
      195.0
      195.3
      99.8
      101.8
      101.9
      161.2
      162.8
      149.9
      158.0
       
      157.9
      160.8
      161.4
      100.0
      101.8
      102.2




      Low relative humidity

      The ability of SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers to collect mixed xylenes at low humidity was tested by sampling a test atmosphere containing 468 mg/m3, 218 mg/m3, 204 mg/m3, 166 mg/m3 m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene, and ethylbenzene, respectively (at 5% RH and 20 °C) with three samplers for four hours. The samples were analyzed immediately. Sampling rates (760 mmHg and 25 °C) were 13.92, 13.63, and 13.94 mL/min for m-xylene; 14.23, 13.93, and 14.24 mL/min for o-xylene; 14.05, 13.77, and 14.08 mL/min for p-xylene; and 14.01, 13.73, and 14.02 mL/min for ethylbenzene.

      Low concentration

      The ability of SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers to collect mixed xylenes at low concentrations was tested by sampling a test atmosphere containing 22 mg/m3, 10 mg/m3, 10 mg/m3, 8 mg/m3 m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene, and ethylbenzene, respectively (at 80% RH and 22 °C) with three samplers for four hours. The samples were analyzed immediately. Sampling rates (760 mmHg and 25 °C) were 13.44, 13.68, and 13.16 mL/min for m-xylene; 13.90, 14.28, and 13.53 mL/min for o-xylene; 13.32, 13.69, and 13.36 mL/min for p-xylene; and 13.71, 13.76, and 13.37 mL/min for ethylbenzene.

      Interference

      The ability of SKC 575-002 Passive Samplers to collect mixed xylenes in the presence of sampling interferences was tested by sampling a test atmosphere containing 230 mg/m3, 107 mg/m3, 100 mg/m3, 82 mg/m3, 365 mg/m3, 372 mg/m3 m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and butyl acetate respectively (at 81% RH and 21 °C) with three samplers for four hours. The samples were analyzed immediately. Sampling rates (760 mmHg and 25 °C) were 13.73, 13.12, and13.77 mL/min for m-xylene; 14.06, 13.43, and 14.08 mL/min for o-xylene; 13.86, 13.25, and 13.90 mL/min for p-xylene; and 13.80, 13.18, and 13.86 mL/min for ethylbenzene.

    4.10 Qualitative analysis

    The identity of suspected mixed xylenes can be confirmed by GC/mass spectrometry. Mass spectra for the analytes are presented below.

graph
Figure 4.10.1 Mass spectrum for m-xylene.
  graph
Figure 4.10.2 Mass spectrum for o-xylene.
 
 
graph
Figure 4.10.3 Mass spectrum for p-xylene.
  graph
Figure 4.10.4 Mass spectrum for ethylbenzene.





1. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology; 3rd ed.; Grayson, M Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1984, Vol. 24; pp. 709-744.

2. Documentation of the Threshold Limits Values and Biological and Indices, 6th ed., American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc: Cincinnati, OH, 1991, Vol. III, pp. 187-193.

3. OSHA Analytical Methods Manual; Vol. 1; U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration; Directorate for Technical Support, OSHA Salt Lake Technical Center: Salt Lake City, UT, 1990; Method 7: Organic Vapors; American Conference of Governmental Hygienists (ACGIH): Cincinnati, OH; Publication No. 4542.

4. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, 4th ed.; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: Cincinnati, OH, 1996, Method 1501: Hydrocarbons, Aromatic; (NIOSH) Cincinnati, OH; Publication No. 94-113.

5. Documentation of the Threshold Limits Values and Biological and Indices, 6th ed., American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc: Cincinnati, OH, 1991, Vol. III, pp. 1732-1740.

6. Documentation of the Threshold Limits Values and Biological and Indices, 6th ed., American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc: Cincinnati, OH, 1991, Vol. I, pp. 581-584.

7. 1998 TLVs and BEIs, Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents, ISBN: 1-882417-23-2; American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, (ACGIH): Cincinnati, OH, 1998.

8. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd ed.; Grayson, M Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1984, Vol. 24; pp. 709-744.

9. ACS Publications; http://www.osha-slc.gov/pls/oshaweb/owaredirect.html?p_url=http://pubs.acs.org/hotartcl/cenear/960624/prod.html (accessed March 1999).

10. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd ed.; Grayson, M Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1984, Vol. 24; pp. 709-744.

11. The Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 8th ed.; Revised by Hawley, G., Ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, 1971, p. 358, 942, 943.

12. The Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 8th ed.; Revised by Hawley, G., Ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, 1971, p. 358, 942, 943.

13. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd ed.; Grayson, M Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1984, Vol. 24; pp. 709-744.

14. OSHA Computerized Information System Database, Chemical Sampling Information, Salt Lake Technical Center, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Salt Lake City, UT March 1999.

15. OSHA Computerized Information System Database, Chemical Sampling Information, Salt Lake Technical Center, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Salt Lake City, UT March 1999.

16. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd ed.; Grayson, M Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1984, Vol. 24; pp. 709-744.

17. Documentation of the Threshold Limits Values and Biological and Indices, 6th ed., American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc: Cincinnati, OH, 1991, Vol. II, pp. 581-584.

18. Documentation of the Threshold Limits Values and Biological and Indices, 6th ed., American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc: Cincinnati, OH, 1991, Vol. III, pp. 1732-1740.

19. Documentation of the Threshold Limits Values and Biological and Indices, 6th ed., American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Inc: Cincinnati, OH, 1991, Vol. I, pp. 581-584.

20. The Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 8 th ed.; Revised by Hawley, G., Ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, 1971, p. 358, 942, 943.

21. Burright, D.; Chan, Y.; Eide, M.; Elskamp, C.; Hendricks, W.; Rose, M. "Evaluation Guidelines for Air Sampling Methods Utilizing Chromatographic Analysis", OSHA Salt Lake Technical Center, U.S. Department of Labor: Salt Lake City, UT, 1999 (in-revision).

22. Burright, D.; Chan, Y.; Eide, M.; Elskamp, C.; Hendricks, W.; Rose, M. "Evaluation Guidelines for Air Sampling Methods Utilizing Chromatographic Analysis", OSHA Salt Lake Technical Center, U.S. Department of Labor: Salt Lake City, UT, 1999 (in-revision).


















US Department of LaborContact InformationDisclaimer
OSHA Home PageOSHA IndexOSHA Search