|
|
NIOSH REL: 400 ppm (980 mg/m3) TWA, 500 ppm (1,225 mg/m3) STEL
Current OSHA PEL: 400 ppm (980 mg/m3) TWA
1989 OSHA PEL: 400 ppm (980 mg/m3) TWA, 500 ppm (1,225 mg/m3) STEL
19931994 ACGIH TLV: 400 ppm (983 mg/m3) TWA, 500 ppm (1,230 mg/m3) STEL
Description of substance: Colorless liquid with the odor of rubbing alcohol.
LEL: . 2.0% (10% LEL, 2,000 ppm)
Original (SCP) IDLH: 12,000 ppm
Basis for original (SCP) IDLH: The chosen IDLH is based on the statement by Patty [1963] that rats survived when exposed for 4 hours to 12,000 ppm but exposure for 8 hours to 12,000 ppm resulted in death among one half of the group [Smyth 1956].
Existing shortterm exposure guidelines: National
Research Council [NRC 1984] Emergency Exposure Guidance Levels
(EEGLs):
1hour EEGL: 400 ppm
24hour EEGL: 200 ppm
ACUTE TOXICITY DATA:
Lethal concentration data:
|
|
| ||||
| Rat
Mouse Rat | Carpenter et al. 1949
NCI 1974 Smyth 1956 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lethal dose data:
| LD50
(mg/kg) |
| |||||
| Rat
Mouse Rabbit | Antonova & Salmina 1978
Antonova & Salmina 1978 WHO 1970 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other animal data: RD50 (mouse), 17,693 ppm [Alarie 1981]. It has been reported that rats survived when exposed to 12,000 ppm for 4 hours [Smyth 1956].
Human data: Ten volunteers exposed for 3 to 5 minutes
to 200, 400, or 800 ppm reported mild to moderate irritation
of the eyes, nose, and throat at the two higher concentrations
[Nelson et al. 1943]. The probable lethal oral dose has been reported
to be 190 grams [Gosselin et al. 1984]. [Note: An oral dose
of 190 grams is equivalent to a worker being exposed to about
50,700 ppm for 30 minutes, assuming a breathing rate
of 50 liters per minute and 100% absorption.]
| Revised IDLH: 2,000 ppm [LEL]
Basis for revised IDLH: Based on health considerations and acute toxicity data in humans [Gosselin et al. 1984; Nelson et al. 1943] and animals [NCI 1974; Smyth 1956], a value of about 2,400 ppm would have been appropriate for isopropyl alcohol. However, the revised IDLH for isopropyl alcohol is 2,000 ppm based strictly on safety considerations (i.e., being 10% of the lower explosive limit of 2%). |
REFERENCES:
1. Alarie Y [1981]. Doseresponse analysis in animal studies: prediction of human responses. Environ Health Perspect 42:913.
2. Antonova VI, Salmina ZA [1978]. The maximal permissible concentration of isopropyl alcohol in water bodies with due regard for its action on the gonads and the progeny. Gig Sanit 43(1):811 (in Russian).
3. Carpenter CP, Smyth HF Jr, Pozzani UC [1949]. The assay of acute vapor toxicity, and the grading. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 31:343346.
4. Gosselin RE, Smith RP, Hodge HC [1984]. Clinical toxicology of commercial products. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins Company, pp. III217 to II219.
5. NCI [1974]. Interagency Collaborative Group on Environmental Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute Memorandum, June 17, 1974.
6. Nelson KW, Ege JF Jr, Ross M, Woodman LE, Silverman L [1943]. Sensory response to certain industrial solvent vapors. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 25(7):282285.
7. NRC [1984]. Emergency and continuous exposure limits for selected airborne contaminants. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, Committee on Toxicology, Board on Toxicology and Environmental Health Hazards, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council, pp. 5668.
8. Patty FA, ed. [1963]. Industrial hygiene and toxicology. 2nd rev. ed. Vol. II. Toxicology. New York, NY: Interscience Publishers, Inc., p. 1438.
9. Smyth HF Jr [1956]. Improved communication: hygienic standards for daily inhalation. Am Ind Hyg Assoc Q 17:129185.
10. WHO [1970]. Propan2ol: biological data. In: Toxicological
evaluation of some extraction solvents and certain other substances.
Food and Agriculture Organization Nutrition Meetings Report Series
48A. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations, World Health Organization,
pp. 114120.
Go back to the Documentation for Immediately Dangerous To Life or Health Concentrations (IDLHs)